Wong, W. K. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2019

Structural Diversity of B-Cell Receptor Repertoires along the B-cell Differentiation Axis in Humans and Mice

Most current analysis tools for antibody next-generation sequencing data work with primary sequence descriptors, leaving accompanying structural information unharnessed. We have used novel rapid methods to structurally characterize the paratopes of more than 180 million human and mouse B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoire sequences. These structurally annotated paratopes provide unprecedented insights into both the structural predetermination and dynamics of the adaptive immune response. We show that B-cell types can be distinguished based solely on these structural properties. Antigen-unexperienced BCR repertoires use the highest number and diversity of paratope structures and these patterns of naive repertoire paratope usage are highly conserved across subjects. In contrast, more differentiated B-cells are more personalized in terms of paratope structure usage. Our results establish the paratope structure differences in BCR repertoires and have applications for many fields including immunodiagnostics, phage display library generation, and \"humanness\" assessment of BCR repertoires from transgenic animals.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2019

Comparative analysis of the CDR loops of antigen receptors

The adaptive immune system uses two main types of antigen receptors: T-cell receptors (TCRs) and antibodies. While both proteins share a globally similar {beta}-sandwich architecture, TCRs are specialised to recognise peptide antigens in the binding groove of the major histocompatibility complex, while antibodies can bind an almost infinite range of molecules. For both proteins, the main determinants of target recognition are the complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops. Five of the six CDRs adopt a limited number of backbone conformations, known as the canonical classes; the remaining CDR ({beta}3 in TCRs and H3 in antibodies) is more structurally diverse. In this paper, we first update the definition of canonical forms in TCRs, build an auto-updating sequence-based prediction tool (available at http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/resources) and demonstrate its application on large scale sequencing studies. Given the global similarity of TCRs and antibodies, we then examine the structural similarity of their CDRs. We find that TCR and antibody CDRs tend to have different length distributions, and where they have similar lengths, they mostly occupy distinct structural spaces. In the rare cases where we found structural similarity, the underlying sequence patterns for the TCR and antibody version are different. Finally, where multiple structures have been solved for the same CDR sequence, the structural variability in TCR loops is higher than that in antibodies, suggesting TCR CDRs are more flexible. These structural differences between TCR and antibody CDRs may be important to their different biological functions.

bioinformatics↗