Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wislowska, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Wislowska, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

On the development of sleep states in the first weeks of life

Human newborns spend up to 18 hours sleeping. The organization of their sleep differs immensely from adult sleep, and its quick maturation and fundamental changes correspond to the rapid cortical development at this age. Manual sleep classification is specifically challenging in this population given major body movements and frequent shifts between vigilance states; in addition various staging criteria co-exist. In the present study we utilized a machine learning approach and investigated how EEG complexity and sleep stages evolve during the very first weeks of life. We analyzed 42 full-term infants which were recorded twice (at week two and five after birth) with full polysomnography. For sleep classification EEG signal complexity was estimated using multi-scale permutation entropy and fed into a machine learning classifier. Interestingly the babys brain signal complexity (and spectral power) revealed huge developmental changes in sleep in the first 5 weeks of life, and were restricted to NREM (\"quiet\") and REM (\"active sleep\") states with little to no changes in state wake. Data demonstrate that our classifier performs well over chance (i.e., >33% for 3-class classification) and reaches almost human scoring accuracy (60% at week-2, 73% at week-5). Altogether, these results demonstrate that characteristics of newborn sleep develop rapidly in the first weeks of life and can be efficiently identified by means of machine learning techniques.\n\nAuthor summaryThe organization of newborn sleep differs from adult sleep, and its ongoing maturation over time corresponds with cortical development. However, sleep scoring in this population is challenging given frequent artifacts in polysomnography (PSG) and absence of established staging criteria which results in low inter-scorer reliability. To investigate changes in the early brain activity, we analyzed large sample of newborn data at week 2 and 5 after birth. First we evaluated sleep that was previously scored visually, in terms of both entropy and oscillatory power. Next we accessed the performance of automatic sleep scoring based on machine learning compared with conventional, manual scoring. We observed clear developmental changes on the brain-level in the first 5 weeks of life in human newborns. These changes were limited to \"quiet\" NREM and \"active\" REM sleep. Also our classifier data demonstrated that we can classify well above chance and similar to human scorers using multi-scale permutation entropy (and just 6 EEG and 5 physiological channels).

neuroscience↗

Standing Sentinel during Sleep: Continued Evaluation of Environmental Stimuli in the Absence of Consciousness

While it is a well-established finding that subjects own names (SON) or familiar voices are salient during wakefulness, we here investigated processing of environmental stimuli during sleep including deep N3 and REM sleep. Besides the effects of sleep depth we investigated how sleep-specific EEG patterns (i.e. sleep spindles and slow oscillations [SOs]) relate to stimulus processing. Using 256-channel EEG we studied processing of auditory stimuli by means of event-related oscillatory responses (de-/ synchronisation, ERD/ERS) and potentials (ERPs) in N = 17 healthy sleepers. We varied stimulus salience by manipulating subjective (SON vs. unfamiliar name) and paralinguistic emotional relevance (familiar vs. unfamiliar voice, FV/UFV). Results reveal that evaluation of voice familiarity continues during all NREM sleep stages and even REM sleep suggesting a sentinel processing mode of the human brain in the absence of wake-like consciousness. Especially UFV stimuli elicit larger responses in a 1-15 Hz range suggesting they continue being salient. Beyond this, we find that sleep spindles and the negative slope of SOs attenuate information processing. However, unlike previously suggested they do not uniformly inhibit information processing, but inhibition seems to be scaled to stimulus salience.\n\nFundingCB is supported by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. and CB, MW and DPJH are supported by a grant from the Austrian Science Fund FWF (Y-777). CB, RdG, MW and DPJH are also supported by the Doctoral College \"Imaging the Mind\" (FWF; W1233-G17).

neuroscience↗