Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wioland, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Wioland, H..

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Tropomodulin and Leiomodin Differentially Nucleate Tropomyosin Assembly on Actin Filaments

Tropomyosins play a central role in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by assembling along filaments into rope-like, head-to-tail polymers ("clusters") along filaments that regulate the binding and activity of numerous actin-binding proteins. Importantly, in cells, tropomyosins do not decorate actin filaments uniformly; some filaments are devoid of tropomyosins, whereas others recruit specific isoforms. To explore the diversity of tropomyosin-isoform binding kinetics and identify factors that control their assembly, we designed tropomyosin constructs, bearing a natural N-terminal acetylation and targeted cysteine mutations for fluorescence labelling. We analysed the binding of different tropomyosin isoforms to individual actin filaments reconstituted inside a microfluidic chamber. We show that, despite significant differences in spontaneous nucleation and elongation rates, all tested tropomyosin isoforms can coassemble within the same clusters. In addition, we identified tropomodulin and leiomodin, two pointed-end-binding proteins, to efficiently nucleate the formation of tropomyosin clusters on actin filaments, for all tested tropomyosin isoforms. Notably, while tropomodulin nucleates tropomyosin clusters from the pointed end, leiomodin does so along the entire filament.

biochemistry↗

Action of cofilin on ADP-Pi-containing actin filaments

In cells, the disassembly of actin filaments is tightly controlled by molecular mechanisms where cofilin plays a central role. Cofilin binds to actin filaments cooperatively, forming clusters that lead to the severing of the filaments. Since cofilin binds preferentially filaments that have hydrolysed ATP and released inorganic phosphate (Pi), most studies have focused on the action of cofilin on ADP-actin filaments. Here, we ask how cofilin binds and severs filaments that still contain a large fraction of ADP{middle dot}Pi-actin. To answer this, we use microfluidics and fluorescence microscopy to monitor single filaments exposed to cofilin in controlled conditions, allowing us to disentangle and to quantify the different reactions. We find that the step limiting cluster nucleation is the binding of 2 cofilins on a minimal group of 3-4 contiguous ADP-actin subunits. Cofilin clusters then expand mostly in the direction of the pointed end of the filament, by easily binding to the ADP-actin neighbor of an ADP{middle dot}Pi-actin subunit, whose Pi release it accelerates. Severing at the ADP{middle dot}Pi-actin/cofilin cluster boundary is 30-fold slower than for an ADP-actin boundary. Globally, it seems that cofilin senses and modifies the nucleotide state of the actin subunits that are in its direct vicinity only. Our results provide a more comprehensive understanding of the action of cofilin, taking into account the nucleotide-state complexity of actin filaments.

biochemistry↗

DAAM1 formin and Ena/VASP proteins assemble functionally distinct actin filaments for focal adhesions

Eukaryotic cells contain multiple biochemically distinct actin filament networks, which enable versatile functions of actin in a range of cellular processes. Yet, the mechanisms by which specific actin filament networks are assembled in a common cytoplasm remain elusive. Here, we investigated how functionally distinct actin nanoscale layers, specified by -actininand tropomyosin isoforms, Tpm1.6 and Tpm3.2, are assembled at focal adhesions. By combining genetic perturbations with mitochondrial-targeting of actin polymerases, we discovered that DAAM1 formin assembles Tpm3.2-actin filaments, whereas Ena/VASP family proteins polymerize -actinin cross-linked actin filament bundles at focal adhesions. Consequently, loss of DAAM1 dampened Tpm3.2 protein levels and impaired focal adhesion disassembly, thus phenocopying Tpm3.2-deficient cells. In contrast, Ena/VASP depletion led to defective focal adhesion maturation and loss of -actinin from focal adhesions. More broadly, our study highlights specific roles for formin and Ena/VASP family proteins in assembling biochemically and functionally distinct linear actin filament arrays in cells.

cell biology↗

Rapid aging and disassembly of actin filaments from two evolutionary distant yeasts

Actin is an essential cytoskeletal protein that is extremely well conserved across the tree of life. Similarities and differences in the way actin from different species self-assembles into filaments inform our understanding of its evolution. However, this basic knowledge is largely incomplete. Here, we address this issue by systematically characterizing assembly kinetics for actin from two yeast species that are five hundred million years apart in evolution, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and compare them to the well-studied actin from rabbit skeletal muscle from which they diverged a billion years ago. By monitoring individual actin filaments under controlled conditions, we accurately quantified their barbed end elongation from ATP-actin monomers, their disassembly in the ADP{middle dot}Pi and ADP states, as well as the release of inorganic phosphate, which marks their aging. We find that, in the ATP state, both yeast actins behave strikingly like mammalian actin at filament barbed ends. In contrast, yeast actin filaments in both the ADP{middle dot}Pi and the ADP states depolymerize several-fold faster than their mammalian counterparts, and they release inorganic phosphate over 20-fold faster. We show that the absence of methylation on histidine 73 largely accounts for this faster aging of yeast actin filaments. We also reveal differences between the actins of the two yeasts. In particular, ADP-actin filaments depolymerize faster and are mechanically more flexible in Saccharomyces cerevisiae compared to Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Our findings suggest that actins expressed across species possess more diverse and specialized biochemical characteristics than previously recognized.

biochemistry↗

Probing protein-protein interactions with drag flow: A case study of F-actin and tropomyosin

Tropomyosin are central regulators of the actin cytoskeleton, controlling the binding and activity of the other actin binding proteins. The interaction between tropomyosin and actin is quite unique: single tropomyosin dimers bind weakly to actin filaments but get stabilised by end-to-end attachment with neighbouring tropomyosin dimers, forming clusters which wrap around the filament. Force spectroscopy is a powerful approach for studying protein-protein interactions, but classical methods which usually pull with pN forces on a single protein pair, are not well adapted to tropomyosins. Here, we propose a method in which a hydrodynamic drag force is applied directly to the proteins of interest, by imposing a controlled fluid flow inside a microfluidic chamber. The breaking of the protein bonds is directly visualised with fluorescence microscopy. Using this approach, we reveal that very low forces from 0.01 to 0.1 pN per tropomyosin dimer trigger the detachment of entire tropomyosin clusters from actin filaments. We show that the tropomyosin cluster detachment rate depends on the cytoplasmic tropomyosin isoform (Tpm1.6, 1.7, 1.8) and increases exponentially with the applied force. These observations lead us to propose a cluster detachment model which suggests that tropomyosins dynamically explore different positions over the actin filament. Our experimental setup can be used with many other cytoskeletal proteins, and we show, as a proof-of-concept, that the velocity of myosin-X motors is reduced by an opposing fluid flow. Overall, this method expands the range of protein-protein interactions that can be studied by force spectroscopy. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=173 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/653996v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19298b4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16766beorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18a70c6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f1fad5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

biophysics↗

HIV-1 budding requires cortical actin disassembly by the oxidoreductase MICAL1

Many enveloped viruses bud from the plasma membrane that is tightly associated with a dense and thick actin cortex. This actin network represents a significant challenge for membrane deformation and scission, and how it is remodeled during the late steps of the viral cycle is largely unknown. Using super-resolution microscopy, we show that HIV-1 buds in areas of the plasma membrane with low cortical F-actin levels. We find that the cellular oxidoreductase MICAL1 locally depolymerizes actin at budding sites to promote HIV-1 budding and release. In the absence of MICAL1, F-actin abnormally remains at viral budding sites, incompletely budded viruses accumulate at the plasma membrane and viral release is impaired. Remarkably, normal viral release can be restored in MICAL1-depleted cells by inhibiting Arp2/3-dependent branched actin networks. Mechanistically, we find that MICAL1 directly disassembles branched-actin networks and controls the timely recruitment of the ESCRT scission machinery during viral budding. In addition, the MICAL1 activator Rab35 is recruited at budding sites, functions in the same pathway as MICAL1 and is also required for viral release. This work reveals a role for oxidoreduction in triggering local actin depolymerization to control HIV-1 budding, a mechanism that may be widely used by other viruses. The debranching activity of MICAL1 could be involved beyond viral budding in various other cellular functions requiring local plasma membrane deformation.

cell biology↗

Continuous self-repair protects vimentin intermediate filaments from fragmentation

Intermediate filaments are key regulators of cell mechanics. Vimentin, a type of intermediate filament expressed in mesenchymal cells and involved in migration, forms a dense network in the cytoplasm that is constantly remodeling through filament transport, elongation/shortening, and subunit exchange. While it is known that filament elongation involves end-to-end annealing, the reverse process of filament shortening by fragmentation remains unclear. Here, we use a combination of in vitro reconstitution, probed by fluorescence imaging and AFM, with theoretical modeling to uncover the molecular mechanism involved in filament breakage. We first show that vimentin filaments are composed of two populations of subunits, half of which are exchangeable and half immobile. We also show that the exchangeable subunits are tetramers. Furthermore, we reveal a mechanism of continuous filament self-repair, where a soluble pool of vimentin tetramers in equilibrium with the filaments is essential to maintain filament integrity. Filaments break due to local fluctuations in the number of tetramers per cross-section, induced by the constant subunit exchange. We determine that a filament tends to break if approximately four tetramers are removed from the same filament cross-section. Finally, we analyze the dynamics of association/dissociation and fragmentation to estimate the binding energy of a tetramer to a complete versus a partially disassembled filament. Our results provide a comprehensive description of vimentin turnover and reveal the link between subunit exchange and fragmentation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTIntermediate filaments such as vimentin are key contributors to cell mechanics. These filaments are continuously assembled and disassembled by the cell as it grows and moves. While the assembly process is relatively well characterized, here we investigate their much less understood disassembly. We find that the filaments continuously exchange their constitutive proteins with the surrounding solution throughout their length and when too many subunits are removed, the filament breaks. This process sharply differs from the length regulation mechanisms known to occur in other types of filaments involved in the regulation of cell mechanics. Importantly, we also identify two distinct populations of subunits within the filaments, which raises new questions about vimentin intermediate filament structure.

biophysics↗

Fascin-induced bundling protects actin filaments from disassembly by cofilin

Actin filament turnover plays a central role in shaping actin networks, yet the feedback mechanism between network architecture and filament assembly dynamics remains unclear. The activity of ADF/cofilin, the main protein family responsible for filament disassembly, has been mainly studied at the single filament level. Here, we report that fascin, by crosslinking filaments into bundles, strongly slows down filament disassembly by cofilin. We show that this is mainly due to a slower nucleation of the first cofilin clusters, which occurs up to 100-fold slower on large bundles compared to single filaments. In contrast, severing at cofilin cluster boundaries is unaffected by fascin bundling. After the nucleation of an initial cofilin cluster on a filament of a bundle, we observe the local removal of fascin. Surprisingly, the nucleation of cofilin clusters on adjacent filaments is highly enhanced, locally. We propose that this inter-filament cooperativity in cofilin binding arises from the local propagation of the cofilin-induced change in helicity from one filament to the other filaments of the bundle. Taken together, these observations reveal the molecular events explaining why, despite inter-filament cooperativity, fascin crosslinking protects actin filaments from cofilin-induced disassembly. These findings highlight the important role played by crosslinkers in organizing actin networks and modulating the activity of other regulatory proteins.

biochemistry↗

Cellular organization in lab-evolved and extant multicellular species obeys a maximum entropy law

The prevalence of multicellular organisms is due in part to their ability to form complex structures. How cells pack in these structures is a fundamental biophysical issue, underlying their functional properties. However, much remains unknown about how cell packing geometries arise, and how they are affected by random noise during growth - especially absent developmental programs. Here, we quantify the statistics of cellular neighborhoods of two different multicellular eukaryotes: lab-evolved "snowflake" yeast and the green alga Volvox carteri. We find that despite large differences in cellular organization, the free space associated with individual cells in both organisms closely fits a modified gamma distribution, consistent with maximum entropy predictions originally developed for granular materials. This entropic cellular packing ensures a degree of predictability despite noise, facilitating parent-offspring fidelity even in the absence of developmental regulation. Together with simulations of diverse growth morphologies, these results suggest that gamma-distributed cell neighborhood sizes are a general feature of multicellularity, arising from conserved statistics of cellular packing.

biophysics↗

Dynamics of Tpm1.8 domains on actin filaments with single moleculeresolution

Tropomyosins regulate dynamics and functions of the actin cytoskeleton by forming long chains along the two strands of actin filaments that act as gatekeepers for the binding of other actin-binding proteins. The fundamental molecular interactions underlying the binding of tropomyosin to actin are still poorly understood. Using microfluidics and fluorescence microscopy, we observed the binding of fluorescently labelled tropomyosin isoform Tpm1.8 to unlabelled actin filaments in real time. This approach in conjunction with mathematical modeling enabled us to quantify the nucleation, assembly and disassembly kinetics of Tpm1.8 on single filaments and at the single molecule level. Our analysis suggests that Tpm1.8 decorates the two strands of the actin filament independently. Nucleation of a growing tropomyosin domain proceeds with high probability as soon as the first Tpm1.8 molecule is stabilised by the addition of a second molecule, ultimately leading to full decoration of the actin filament. In addition, Tpm1.8 domains are asymmetrical, with enhanced dynamics at the edge oriented towards the barbed end of the actin filament. The complete description of Tpm1.8 kinetics on actin filaments presented here provides molecular insight into actin-tropomyosin filament formation and the role of tropomyosins in regulating actin filament dynamics.

biophysics↗

Actin filament oxidation by MICAL1 suppresses protections from cofilin-induced disassembly

Proteins of the ADF/cofilin family play a central role in the disassembly of actin filaments, and their activity must be tightly regulated in cells. Recently, the oxidation of actin filaments by the enzyme MICAL1 was found to amplify the severing action of cofilin through unclear mechanisms. Two essential factors normally prevent filament disassembly: the inactivation of cofilin by phosphorylation, and the protection of filaments by tropomyosins, but whether actin oxidation might interfere with these safeguard mechanisms is unknown. Using single filament experiments in vitro, we found that actin filament oxidation by MICAL1 increases, by several orders of magnitude, both cofilin binding and severing rates, explaining the dramatic synergy between oxidation and cofilin for filament disassembly. Remarkably, we found that actin oxidation bypasses the need for cofilin activation by dephosphorylation. Indeed, non-activated, phosphomimetic S3D-cofilin binds and severs oxidized actin filaments rapidly, in conditions where non-oxidized filaments are unaffected. Finally, tropomyosin Tpm1.8 loses its ability to protect filaments from cofilin severing activity when actin is oxidized by MICAL1. Together, our results show that MICAL1-induced oxidation of actin filaments suppresses their physiological protection from the action of cofilin. We propose that in cells, direct post-translational modification of actin filaments by oxidation is a way to trigger their severing, in spite of being decorated by tropomyosin, and without requiring the activation of cofilin.

biochemistry↗

Twinfilin uncaps filament barbed ends to promote turnover of lamellipodial actin networks

Coordinated polymerization of actin filaments provides force for cell migration, morphogenesis, and endocytosis. Capping Protein (CP) is central regulator of actin dynamics in all eukaryotes. It binds actin filament (F-actin) barbed ends with high affinity and slow dissociation kinetics to prevent filament polymerization and depolymerization. In cells, however, CP displays remarkably rapid dynamics within F-actin networks, but the underlying mechanism has remained enigmatic. We report that a conserved cytoskeletal regulator, twinfilin, is responsible for CPs rapid dynamics and specific localization in cells. Depletion of twinfilin led to stable association of CP with cellular F-actin arrays and its treadmilling throughout leading-edge lamellipodium. These were accompanied by diminished F-actin disassembly rates. In vitro single filament imaging approaches revealed that twinfilin directly promotes dissociation of CP from filament barbed ends, while allowing subsequent filament depolymerization. These results uncover an evolutionary conserved bipartite mechanism that controls how actin cytoskeleton-mediated forces are generated in cells.

cell biology↗

Quantitative variations of ADF/cofilin’s multiple actions on actin filaments with pH

Actin Depolymerizing Factor (ADF)/cofilin is the main protein family promoting the disassembly of actin filaments, which is essential for numerous cellular functions. ADF/cofilin proteins disassemble actin filaments through different reactions, as they bind to their sides, sever them, and promote the depolymerization of the resulting ADF/cofilin-saturated filaments. Moreover, the efficiency of ADF/cofilin is known to be very sensitive to pH. ADF/cofilin thus illustrates two challenges in actin biochemistry: separating the different regulatory actions of a single protein, and characterizing them as a function of specific biochemical conditions. Here, we investigate the different reactions of ADF/cofilin on actin filaments, over four different values of pH ranging from pH 6.6 to pH 7.8, using single filament microfluidics techniques. We show that lowering pH reduces the effective filament severing rate by increasing the rate at which filaments become saturated by ADF/cofilin, thereby reducing the number of ADF/cofilin domain boundaries, where severing can occur. The severing rate per domain boundary, however, remains unchanged at different pH values. The ADF/cofilin-decorated filaments (refered to as \"cofilactin\" filaments) depolymerize from both ends. We show here that, at physiological pH (pH 7.0 to 7.4), the pointed end depolymerization of cofilactin filaments is barely faster than that of bare filaments. In contrast, cofilactin barbed ends undergo an \"unstoppable\" depolymerization (depolymerizing for minutes despite the presence of free actin monomers and capping protein in solution), throughout our range of pH. We thus show that, at physiological pH, the main contribution of ADF/cofilin to filament depolymerization is at the barbed end.\n\nA number of key cellular processes rely on the proper assembly and disassembly of actin filament networks 1. The central regulator of actin disassembly is the ADF/cofilin protein family 2, 3, which comprises three isoforms in mammals: cofilin-1 (cof1, found in nearly all cell types), cofilin-2 (cof2, found primarily in muscles) and Actin Depolymerization Factor (ADF, found mostly in neurons and epithelial cells). We refer to them collectively as \"ADF/cofilin\".\n\nOver the years, the combined efforts of several labs have led to the following understanding of actin filament disassembly by ADF/cofilin. Molecules of ADF/cofilin bind stoechiometrically 4, 5 to the sides of actin filaments, with a strong preference for ADP-actin subunits 6-10. Though ADF/cofilin molecules do not contact each other 11, they bind in a cooperative manner, leading to the formation of ADF/cofilin domains on the filaments 5, 7, 9, 12, 13. Compared to bare F-actin, the filament portions decorated by ADF/cofilin (refered to as \"cofilactin\") are more flexible 14, 15 and exhibit a shorter right-handed helical pitch, with a different subunit conformation 11, 16-19. Thermal fluctuations are then enough to sever actin filaments at (or near) domain boundaries8, 9, 13, 20, 21. Cofilactin filaments do not sever, but depolymerize from both ends 13 thereby renewing the actin monomer pool.\n\nADF/cofilin thus disassembles actin filaments through the combination of different actions. As such, it vividly illustrates a current challenge in actin biochemistry: identifying and quantifying the multiple reactions involving a single protein. This is a very difficult task for bulk solution assays, where a large number of reactions take place simultaneously, and single-filament techniques have played a key role in deciphering ADF/cofilins actions 9, 13, 20, 22-24. In particular, the microfluidics-based method that we have developed over the past years, is a powerful tool for such investigations 25. It has recently allowed us to quantify the kinetics of the aforementioned reactions, and to discover that ADF/cofilin-saturated filament (cofilactin) barbed ends can hardly stop depolymerizing, even when ATP-G-actin and capping protein are present in solution 13.\n\nIn addition, ADF/cofilin is very sensitive to pH 4, 5, 26-29. In cells, pH can be a key regulatory factor 30. It can vary between compartments, between cell types, and be specifically modulated. We can consider that a typical cytoplasmic pH would be comprised between 7.0 and 7.4. Recently, we have quantified the different reactions involving ADF/cofilin at pH 7.8 13, leaving open the question of how these reaction rates are indivdually affected by pH variations. For instance, it has been reported that ADF/cofilin is a more potent filament disassembler at higher pH values 4, 5, 26-29 but the actual impact of pH on the rate constants of individual reactions has yet to be characterized. Moreover, whether the unstoppable barbed end depolymerization that we have recently discovered for ADF/cofilin-saturated filaments at pH 7.8 13 remains significant at lower, more physiological pH values is an open question.\n\nHere, we investigate how the different contributions of ADF/cofilin (using unlabeled ADF, unlabeled cof1 and eGFP-cof1) to actin filament disassembly depend on pH, which we varied from 6.6 to 7.8. We first present the methods which we have used to do so, based on the observation of individual filaments, using microfluidics (Fig. 1). We measured cofilins abitility to decorate actin filament by binding to its sides (Fig. 2), and the rate at which individual cofilin domains severed actin filaments (Fig. 3). We next quantified the kinetic parameters of filament ends, for bare and ADF/cofilin-saturated (cofilactin) filaments (Fig. 4), and we specifically quantified the extent to which the barbed ends of cofilactin filaments are in a state which can hardly stop depolymerizing (Fig. 5). We finally summarize our results (Fig. 6).\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=87 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/422824_fig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (38K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5a6fdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1165d4borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@146f0b7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@658f72_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO Using microfluidics to monitor individual actin filaments and the binding of cofilin. (A) Experiments are performed in microfluidic chambers, sketched from above. The main channel is connected through three inlets to different protein solutions. Controlling the pressure in each inlet allows one to rapidly change the solution in the field of view.\n\n(B) Sketch of a typical experiment (side view). Filaments are elongated from coverslip-anchored spectrin-actin seeds, by flowing in with ATP-G-actin. Filaments are then aged by flowing in a solution of ATP-G-actin at the critical concentration, for at least 15 min. This results in >99% of the monomers in the ADP-state. Finally, filaments are exposed to ADF/cofilin.\n\n(C) Example of a field of view, imaged with TIRFm. ADP-F-actin labelled with Alexa-488 is exposed to mCherry-cofilin-1, which forms observable domains on the filaments.\n\nC_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=180 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/422824_fig2.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 2\">\nView larger version (47K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1aca24borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d2f404org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1924892org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@daaaac_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO Cofilin binds more slowly to filaments at higher pH values. (A). Experimental configuration. Actin filaments are grown from spectrin-actin seeds with a long middle segment of unlabelled ADP-actin.\n\n(B). Time-lapse showing an unlabeled ADP-actin filament become saturated by eGFP-cof1 over time.\n\n(C-D). Mean normalized eGFP-cofilin-1 fluorescence signal, binding onto unlabelled ADP-F-actin. 150 nM (C) and 400 nM (D) eGFP-cofilin-1 was injected in the chamber from time t=0 onwards. The fluorescence signal was averaged along 20 to 35 pixels (3.5 to 6 {micro}m) for each filment. Number of filaments (C) N = 10, 10, 18, 20, for pH 6.6 Hepes, 7.0 Hepes, 7.0 Tris and 7.4 Tris, respectively, and\n\n(D) N = 10 in all conditions.\n\n(E). Number of cofilin subunits in individual domains, increasing over time. For clarity, the time origin has been shifted for each curve. Lines: linear fit. Condition: 400 nM eGFP-cofilin-1, pH 7.0 Hepes.\n\n(F). Growth rate of individual cofilin domains at different eGFP-cofilin-1 concentrations and pH. Value: median, error bars: interquartile range. N = 10 domains, except N = 9 for pH 6.6 Hepes 150 nM cof1, and for pH 7.8 Tris 400 nM cof1.\n\nC_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=41 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/422824_fig3.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 3\">\nView larger version (18K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fb31d4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@846198org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12379d0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@127b96_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 3.C_FLOATNO The severing rate per cofilin domain is unaffected by pH. (A). Experimental setup. Alexa-568-labelled actin filaments are polymerized from actin-spectrin seeds, and aged before being exposed to eGFP-cof1.\n\n(B). Typical kymograph. 200 nM eGFP-cof1 (green) is constantly injected, binds F-actin (red) and induces severing (lightning symbols).\n\n(C). Fraction of cofilin domains with no severing event detected near their edges, over time. Time t=0 is defined for each domain as the last frame before they become visible. The survival fraction curves are calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method over 22 to 43 filaments, 78 to 90 cofilin domains and 30 to 33 severing events, for each data set.\n\nC_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=146 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/422824_fig4.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 4\">\nView larger version (32K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16fdad8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@889caborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e5b14aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1da73c9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 4.C_FLOATNO Higher pH slows down polymerization and depolymerization of bare F-actin but accelerates depolymerization of ADF/cofilin-saturated filaments at both ends. (A-C) Polymerization from the barbed-end.\n\n(A) Sketch of the experimental configuration, where filaments were grown from actin-spectrin seeds with G-ATP-actin and profilin.\n\n(B) Kymograph of a typical elongating filament.\n\n(C) Polymerization rate at different pH. N = 20 filaments for each condition.\n\n(D-E) Depolymerization from the barbed-end.\n\n(D) Sketch of the experimental configuration. ADP-F-actin is exposed either to buffer only, or to 1-2{micro}M unlabelled ADF or cofilin-1 in order to fully saturate the filament in less than a minute.\n\n(E) Depolymerization rate for different pH values. Right: zoom into the 0-5 sub/s range. From left to right, N = 20, 32, 22, 32, 31 (buffer only); N=9, 14, 23, 33, 34 (ADF-saturated); N=17, 18, 16 (cofilin-1-saturated).\n\n(F-H) Depolymerization from the pointed-end.\n\n(F) Sketch of the experimental configuration. ADP-F-actin was bound to the surface by gelsolin. Filaments were exposed to buffer only (supplemented with 0.4 mM CaCl2 to ensure gelsolin-actin tight binding), containing 1 to 2 {micro}M unlabelled ADF or cofilin-1 to rapidly saturate filaments.\n\n(G) Typical kymograph of a depolymerizing filament saturated with ADF.\n\n(H) Pointed-end depolymerization rate at different pH. N = 14, 20, 15, 20, 20 (buffer); N=20, 20, 16, 20, 20 (ADF-saturated); N= 20, 20, 20 (cofilin-1-saturated).\n\n(C, E, H) Symbol: median, error bars: interquartile range.\n\nC_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=94 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/422824_fig5.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 5\">\nView larger version (22K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e79318org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16a4bb1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18f8fbdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@25dab6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 5.C_FLOATNO The \"unstoppable\" depolymerization of cofilactin barbed ends is observed throughout our pH range. (A-C) Synergy of CP and ADF/cofilin to saturate filaments and initiate barbed end depolymerization.\n\n(A) Sketch of experimental configuration and events. Filaments grow until they are capped with CP. ADF/cofilin can then saturate the filaments, up to their BE which thus uncaps and depolymerizes.\n\n(B) Kymograph of a filament continuously exposed to the same solution containing 0.8 {micro}M G-ATP-actin, 1 {micro}M ADF and 2 nM CP. The filament polymerizes, pauses as it is capped by CP, and eventually depolymerizes.\n\n(C) Fraction of barbed ends that transitioned from a pause to depolymerization. Time t = 0 corresponds to the beginning of the pause (as shown on B). N = 24, 32, 32 filaments for pH 7.0 Hepes, pH 7.0 Tris, pH 7.4 Tris, respectively.\n\n(D-F) Cofilactin barbed ends sustain depolymerization in the presence of ATP-G-actin.\n\n(D) Sketch of the experimental configuration and events. Filaments are polymerized from spectrin-actin seeds and saturated with ADF. Depolymerizing cofilactin filaments are then constantly exposed to a solution of ATP-G-actin.\n\n(E) Fraction of barbed ends that transitioned from depolymerization to polymerization over time, when exposed to 1 {micro}M ATP-G-actin and 0.5 {micro}M ADF (to keep filaments saturated). N = 25, 16, 25, 24, 31 for pH 6.6 Hepes, 7.0 Hepes, 7.0 Tris, 7.4 Tris, 7.8 Tris, respectively.\n\n(F) Same as (E), with 1 {micro}M profilin added to the solution. N= 21, 27, 30 for pH 6.6 Hepes, 7.4 Tris, 7.8 Tris, respectively.\n\nC_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=178 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/422824_fig6.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 6\">\nView larger version (34K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13a07bborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d19d2forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a697daorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3b9d59_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 6.C_FLOATNO Summary of results: barbed end depolymerization is an important contribution of cofilin disassembly at physiological pH. Within the range of pH that we have explored (pH 6.6 to 7.8) we have made the following observations (from top to bottom, on this sketch). A lower pH favors the rapid decoration of filaments by ADF/cofilin, but the severing rate per cofilin domain does not vary with pH. As a consequence, at a higher pH, domain boundaries persist longer (before domains merge) and severing is more efficient. The acceleration of pointed end depolymerization for cofilactin filaments is mostly observed at high pH. The \"unstoppable\" depolymerization of cofilactin barbed ends is observed at all pH, and is more pronounced at lower pH values.\n\nC_FIG

biochemistry↗

Torsional stress generated by ADF/cofilin on cross-linked actin filaments boosts their severing

Proteins of the Actin Depolymerizing Factor (ADF)/cofilin family are the central regulators of actin filament disassembly. A key function of ADF/cofilin is to sever actin filaments. However, how it does so in a physiological context, where filaments are interconnected and under mechanical stress, remains unclear. Here, we monitor and quantify the action of ADF/cofilin in different mechanical situations by using single molecule, single filament, and filament network techniques, coupled to microfluidics. We find that local curvature favors severing, while tension surprisingly has no effect on either cofilin binding or severing. Remarkably, we observe that filament segments that are held between two anchoring points, thereby constraining their twist, experience a mechanical torque upon cofilin binding. We find that this ADF/cofilin-induced torque does not hinder ADF/cofilin binding, but dramatically enhances severing. A simple model, which faithfully recapitulates our experimental observations, indicates that the ADF/cofilin-induced torque increases the severing rate constant 100-fold. A consequence of this mechanism, which we verify experimentally, is that cross-linked filament networks are severed by cofilin far more efficiently than non-connected filaments. We propose that this mechano-chemical mechanism is critical to boost ADF/cofilins ability to sever highly connected filament networks in cells.

biophysics↗

Modulation of formin processivity by profilin and mechanical tension

Formins are major regulators of actin networks. They enhance actin filament dynamics by remaining processively bound to filament barbed ends. How biochemical and mechanical factors affect formin processivity are open questions. Monitoring individual actin filaments in a microfluidic flow, we report that formin mDia1 dissociates faster under higher ionic strength and when actin concentration is increased. Profilin, known to increase the elongation rate of formin-associated filaments, surprisingly decreases the formin dissociation rate, by bringing formin FH1 domains in transient contact with the barbed end. In contrast, piconewton tensile forces applied to actin filaments accelerate formin dissociation by orders of magnitude, largely overcoming profilin-mediated stabilization. We developed a model of formin conformations and its confrontation to our data indicates the existence of two different dissociation pathways, with force favoring one over the other. How cells limit formin dissociation under tension is now a key question for future studies.

biophysics↗