Biology subjects

Winston, J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Winston, J. A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

The in vitro bacterial viability and microbial composition of commercially available canine and feline fecal microbial transplantation products

Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of feces from a healthy donor into the gastrointestinal tract of a diseased recipient to confer a health benefit. FMT is increasingly utilized in veterinary medicine and is offered commercially by AnimalBiomeTM. This study aims to quantitate the colony forming units per gram (CFU/g) in lyophilized AnimalBiomeTM FMT products compared to fresh and lyophilized in-house FMT; and to evaluate microbial compositions across multiple FMT products. FMT products were cultured in aerobic and anaerobic environments. 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing (V4 region) was performed on FMT products and colonies taken from FMT cultures. Three lots each of AnimalBiomeTM DoggyBiomeTM (DB), DoggyBiomeTM from raw fed dogs (DBR), and KittyBiomeTM (KB) were evaluated. Freshly processed stool from screened donors enrolled in The Ohio State University Companion Animal Fecal Bank (CAFB) were used as controls. Freshly processed feces yielded significantly greater total CFU/g compared to all lyophilized products (dogs, P<0.01; cats, P<0.01). KB and feline CAFB lyophilized products exhibited comparable viability (P=0.14). Canine CAFB lyophilized FMT yielded significantly greater CFU/g than DB (P=0.17) and DBR (P=0.018). Each donor has a unique microbial profile (PERMANOVA; dogs, P=0.001; cats, P=0.03). DBR FMT products have a significantly greater abundance of Enterobacteriaceae compared to other canine products (P<0.01); however, no AnimalBiomeTM product showed detectable growth of Gram-negative microbes. These findings will provide evidence for practitioners when choosing FMT products for their patients. Further research is needed to determine the impact of FMT processing on engraftment and clinical outcome.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2021

SARS-CoV-2 infection in free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

Human-to-animal spillover of SARS-CoV-2 virus has occurred in a wide range of animals, but thus far, the establishment of a new natural animal reservoir has not been detected. Here, we detected SARS-CoV-2 virus using rRT-PCR in 129 out of 360 (35.8%) free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from northeast Ohio (USA) sampled between January-March 2021. Deer in 6 locations were infected with at least 3 lineages of SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.2, B.1.596, B.1.582). The B.1.2 viruses, dominant in Ohio at the time, spilled over multiple times into deer populations in different locations. Deer-to-deer transmission may have occurred in three locations. The establishment of a natural reservoir of SARS-CoV-2 in white-tailed deer could facilitate divergent evolutionary trajectories and future spillback to humans, further complicating long-term COVID-19 control strategies. One-Sentence SummaryA significant proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infection in free-ranging US white-tailed deer reveals a potential new reservoir.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) mitigates the host inflammatory response during Clostridioides difficile infection by altering gut bile acids which attenuates NF-κB signaling via bile acid activated receptors

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with increasing morbidity and mortality posing an urgent threat to public health. Recurrence of CDI after successful treatment with antibiotics is high, thus necessitating discovery of novel therapeutics against this enteric pathogen. Administration of the secondary bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, ursodiol) inhibits the life cycle of various strains of C. difficile in vitro, suggesting the FDA approved formulation of UDCA, known as ursodiol, may be able to restore colonization resistance against C. difficile in vivo. However, the mechanism(s) by which ursodiol is able to restore colonization resistance against C. difficile remains unknown. Here, we confirmed that ursodiol inhibits C. difficile R20291 spore germination and outgrowth, growth, and toxin activity in a dose dependent manner in vitro. In a murine model of CDI, exogenous administration of ursodiol resulted in significant alterations in the bile acid metabolome with little to no changes in gut microbial community structure. Ursodiol pretreatment resulted in attenuation of CDI pathogenesis early in the course of disease, which coincided with alterations in the cecal and colonic inflammatory transcriptome, bile acid activated receptors nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR), and transmembrane G protein-coupled membrane receptor 5 (TGR5), which are able to modulate the innate immune response through signaling pathways such as NF-{kappa}B. Although ursodiol pretreatment did not result in a consistent decrease in the C. difficile life cycle in vivo, it was able to attenuate an overly robust inflammatory response that is detrimental to the host during CDI. Ursodiol remains a viable non-antibiotic treatment and/or prevention strategy against CDI. Likewise, modulation of the host innate immune response via bile acid activated receptors, FXR and TGR5, represents a new potential treatment strategy for patients with CDI. ImportanceThe clinical utility of ursodiol for prevention of recurrent CDI is currently in Phase 4 clinical trials. However, the mechanism by which ursodiol exerts its impacts on C. difficile pathogenesis is poorly understood. Herein, we demonstrated that ursodiol pretreatment attenuates CDI pathogenesis early in the course of disease in mice, which coincides with alterations in the cecal and colonic inflammatory transcriptome, bile acid activated receptors nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR), and transmembrane G protein-coupled membrane receptor 5 (TGR5), which are able to modulate the innate immune response through signaling pathways such as NF-{kappa}B. Ursodiol attenuated an overly robust inflammatory response that is detrimental to the host during CDI, and thus remains a viable non-antibiotic treatment and/or prevention strategy against CDI. Likewise, modulation of the host innate immune response via bile acid activated receptors, FXR and TGR5, represents a new potential treatment strategy for patients with CDI. AbbreviationsMCA - -Muricholic acid; {beta}MCA -{beta}-Muricholic acid; {omega}MCA -{omega}-Muricholic acid; CA - Cholic acid; CDCA - Chenodeoxycholic acid; DCA - Deoxycholic acid; GCDCA - Glycochenodeoxycholic acid; GDCA - Glycodeoxycholic acid; GLCA - Glycolithocholic acid; GUDCA - Glycoursodeoxycholic acid; HCA - Hyodeoxycholic acid; iDCA - Isodeoxycholic acid; iLCA - Isolithocholic acid; LCA - Lithocholic acid; TCA - Taurocholic acid; TCDCA - Taurochenodeoxycholic acid; TDCA - Taurodeoxycholic acid; THCA - Taurohyodeoxycholic acid; TUDCA - Tauroursodeoxycholic acid; T{beta}MCA- Tauro-{beta}-muricholic acid; T{omega}MCA -Tauro {omega}-muricholic acid; UDCA Ursodeoxycholic acid.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2019

Characterization of C. difficile strains isolated from companion animals and the associated changes in the host fecal microbiota

BackgroundClostridioides difficile is an enteric pathogen historically known to cause hospital associated (HA)-infections in humans. A major risk factor for CDI in humans is antibiotic usage as it alters the gut microbiota and there is a loss of colonization resistance against C. difficile. In recent years there has been an increase in community associated (CA)-C. difficile infection that does not have the same risk factors as HA-CDI. Potential sources of CA-CDI have been proposed and include animals, food, water, and the environment, however these sources remain poorly investigated. Here, we define the prevalence of C. difficile strains found in different companion animals (canines, felines, and equines) to investigate a potential zoonotic link. C. difficile strains were identified by toxin gene profiling, fluorescent PCR ribotyping, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 16s rRNA gene sequencing was done on animal feces to investigate the relationship between the presence of C. difficile and the gut microbiota in different hosts.\n\nResultsHere, we show that C. difficile was recovered from 20.9% of samples (42/201), which included 33 canines, 2 felines, and 7 equines. Over 69% (29/42) of the isolates were toxigenic and belonged to 14 different ribotypes, with overlap between HA- and CA-CDI cases in humans. The presence of C. difficile results in a shift in the fecal microbial community structure in both canines and equines. Commensal Clostridia C. hiranonis was negatively associated with C. difficile in canines. Further experimentation showed a clear antagonistic relationship between the two strains in vitro, suggesting that commensal Clostridia might play a role in colonization resistance against C. difficile in different hosts.\n\nConclusionsIn this study we investigated a potentially important source of C. difficile transmission: the companion animal population. C. difficile carriage was common in dogs, cats, and horses. C. difficile isolates from companion animals included many of the same ribotypes known to cause HA- and CA-CDI in humans, and had similar antimicrobial resistance profiles as those isolated from human populations. These data contribute to our understanding of non-hospital exposure to C. difficile in the human population and suggest new avenues for reducing C. difficile prevalence in companion animals and, perhaps, thereby reducing CA-CDI in humans.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2019

Secondary bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) alters weight, the gut microbiota, and the bile acid pool in conventional mice

Ursodeoxycholic acid (commercially available as Ursodiol) is a naturally occurring bile acid that is used to treat a variety of hepatic and gastrointestinal diseases. Ursodiol can modulate bile acid pools, which have the potential to alter the gut microbiota community structure. In turn, the gut microbial community can modulate bile acid pools, thus highlighting the interconnectedness of the gut microbiota-bile acid-host axis. Despite these interactions, it remains unclear if and how exogenously administered ursodiol shapes the gut microbial community structure and bile acid pool. This study aims to characterize how ursodiol alters the gastrointestinal ecosystem in conventional mice. C57BL/6J wildtype mice were given one of three doses of ursodiol (50, 150, or 450 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage for 21 days. Alterations in the gut microbiota and bile acids were examined including stool, ileal, and cecal content. Bile acids were also measured in serum. Significant weight loss was seen in mice treated with the low and high dose of ursodiol. Alterations in the microbial community structure and bile acid pool were seen in ileal and cecal content compared to pretreatment, and longitudinally in feces following the 21-day ursodiol treatment. In both ileal and cecal content, members of the Lachnospiraceae family significantly contributed to the changes observed. This study is the first to provide a comprehensive view of how exogenously administered ursodiol shapes the gastrointestinal ecosystem. Further studies to investigate how these changes in turn modify the host physiologic response are important.\n\nImportanceUrsodeoxycholic acid (commercially available as ursodiol) is used to treat a variety of hepatic and gastrointestinal diseases. Despite its widespread use, how ursodiol impacts the gut microbial community structure and bile acid pool remains unknown. This study is the first to provide a comprehensive view of how exogenously administered ursodiol shapes the gastrointestinal ecosystem. Ursodiol administration in conventional mice resulted in significant alterations in the gut microbial community structure and bile acid pool, indicating that ursodiol has direct impacts on the gut microbiota-bile acid-host axis which should be considered when this medication is administered.\n\nBile Acid AbbreviationsMCA - -Muricholic acid; {beta}MCA -{beta}-Muricholic acid; {omega}MCA -{omega}-Muricholic acid; CA - Cholic acid; CDCA - Chenodeoxycholic acid; DCA - Deoxycholic acid; GCDCA - Glycochenodeoxycholic acid; GDCA - Glycodeoxycholic acid; GLCA - Glycolithocholic acid; GUDCA - Glycoursodeoxycholic acid; HCA - Hyodeoxycholic acid; iDCA - Isodeoxycholic acid; iLCA - Isolithocholic acid; LCA - Lithocholic acid; TCA - Taurocholic acid; TCDCA - Taurochenodeoxycholic acid; TDCA - Taurodeoxycholic acid; THCA - Taurohyodeoxycholic acid; TUDCA - Tauroursodeoxycholic acid; T{beta}MCA - Tauro-{beta}-muricholic acid; T{omega}MCA -Tauro {omega}-muricholic acid; UDCA - Ursodeoxycholic acid.

microbiology↗