Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wilson, G. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Wilson, G. H..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Measuring instability in chronic human intracortical neural recordings towards stable, long-term brain-computer interfaces

Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) enable people with tetraplegia to gain intuitive cursor control from movement intentions. To translate to practical use, iBCIs should provide reliable performance for extended periods of time. However, performance begins to degrade as the relationship between kinematic intention and recorded neural activity shifts compared to when the decoder was initially trained. In addition to developing decoders to better handle long-term instability, identifying when to recalibrate will also optimize performance. We propose a method to measure instability in neural data without needing to label user intentions. Longitudinal data were analyzed from two BrainGate2 participants with tetraplegia as they used fixed decoders to control a computer cursor spanning 142 days and 28 days, respectively. We demonstrate a measure of instability that correlates with changes in closed-loop cursor performance solely based on the recorded neural activity (Pearson r = 0.93 and 0.72, respectively). This result suggests a strategy to infer online iBCI performance from neural data alone and to determine when recalibration should take place for practical long-term use.

neuroscience↗

Long-term unsupervised recalibration of cursor BCIs

Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) require frequent recalibration to maintain robust performance due to changes in neural activity that accumulate over time. Compensating for this nonstationarity would enable consistently high performance without the need for supervised recalibration periods, where users cannot engage in free use of their device. Here we introduce a hidden Markov model (HMM) to infer what targets users are moving toward during iBCI use. We then retrain the system using these inferred targets, enabling unsupervised adaptation to changing neural activity. Our approach outperforms the state of the art in large-scale, closed-loop simulations over two months and in closed-loop with a human iBCI user over one month. Leveraging an offline dataset spanning five years of iBCI recordings, we further show how recently proposed data distribution-matching approaches to recalibration fail over long time scales; only target-inference methods appear capable of enabling long-term unsupervised recalibration. Our results demonstrate how task structure can be used to bootstrap a noisy decoder into a highly-performant one, thereby overcoming one of the major barriers to clinically translating BCIs.

neuroscience↗

Decoding spoken English phonemes from intracortical electrode arrays in dorsal precentral gyrus

ObjectiveTo evaluate the potential of intracortical electrode array signals for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to restore lost speech, we measured the performance of classifiers trained to discriminate a comprehensive basis set for speech: 39 English phonemes. We classified neural correlates of spoken-out-loud words in the "hand knob" area of precentral gyrus, which we view as a step towards the eventual goal of decoding attempted speech from ventral speech areas in patients who are unable to speak. ApproachNeural and audio data were recorded while two BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial participants, each with two chronically-implanted 96-electrode arrays, spoke 420 different words that broadly sampled English phonemes. Phoneme onsets were identified from audio recordings, and their identities were then classified from neural features consisting of each electrodes binned action potential counts or high-frequency local field potential power. We also examined two potential confounds specific to decoding overt speech: acoustic contamination of neural signals and systematic differences in labeling different phonemes onset times. Main resultsA linear decoder achieved up to 29.3% classification accuracy (chance = 6%) across 39 phonemes, while a recurrent neural network classifier achieved 33.9% accuracy. Parameter sweeps indicated that performance did not saturate when adding more electrodes or more training data, and that accuracy improved when utilizing time-varying structure in the data. Microphonic contamination and phoneme onset differences modestly increased decoding accuracy, but could be mitigated by acoustic artifact subtraction and using a neural speech onset marker, respectively. SignificanceThe ability to decode a comprehensive set of phonemes using intracortical electrode array signals from a nontraditional speech area suggests that placing electrode arrays in ventral speech areas is a promising direction for speech BCIs.

neuroscience↗