Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Willson, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Willson, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

CAMUS: Scalable Phylogenetic Network Estimation

MotivationPhylogenetic networks are models of evolution that go beyond trees, and so represent reticulate events such as horizontal gene transfer or hybridization, which are frequently found in many taxa. Yet, the estimation of phylogenetic networks is extremely computationally challenging, and nearly all methods are limited to very small datasets with perhaps 10 to 15 species (some limited to even smaller numbers). ResultsWe introduce CAMUS (Constrained Algorithm Maximizing qUartetS), a scalable method for phylogenetic network estimation. CAMUS takes an input constraint tree T as well as a set Q of unrooted quartet trees that it derives from input, and returns a level-1 phylogenetic network N that is built upon T through the addition of edges, in order to maximize the number of quartet trees in Q that are induced in N . We perform a simulation study under the Network Multi-Species Coalescent and show that a simple pipeline using CAMUS provides high accuracy and outstanding speed and scalability, in comparison to two leading methods, PhyloNet-MPL used with a fixed tree and SNaQ. CAMUS is slightly less accurate than PhyloNet-MPL used without a fixed tree, but is much faster (minutes instead of hours) and can complete on inputs with 201 species while PhyloNet-MPL fails to complete on the inputs with more than 51 species. Availability and ImplementationThe source code is available at https://github.com/jsdoublel/camus.

bioinformatics↗

DISCO+QR: Rooting Species Trees in the Presence of GDL and ILS

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWGenes evolve under processes such as gene duplication and loss (GDL), so that gene family trees are multi-copy, as well as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS); both processes produce gene trees that differ from the species tree. The estimation of species trees from sets of gene family trees is challenging, and the estimation of rooted species trees presents additional analytical challenges. Two of the methods developed for this problem are STRIDE (Emms and Kelly, MBE 2017), which roots species trees by considering GDL events, and Quintet Rooting (Tabatabaee et al., ISMB 2022 and Bioinformatics 2022), which roots species trees by considering ILS. We present DISCO+QR, a new method for rooting species trees in the presence of both GDL and ILS. DISCO+QR, operates by taking the input gene family trees and decomposing them into single-copy trees using DISCO (Willson et al., Systematic Biology 2022) and then roots the given species tree using the information in the single-copy gene trees using Quintet Rooting (QR). We show that the relative accuracy of STRIDE and DISCO+QR depend on properties of the dataset (number of species, genes, rate of gene duplication, degree of ILS, and gene tree estimation error), and that each provides advantages over the other under some conditions. Availability: DISCO and QR are available in GitHub. The supplementary materials are available at http://tandy.cs.illinois.edu/discoqr-suppl.pdf.

bioinformatics↗

Comparing Methods for Species Tree Estimation With Gene Duplication and Loss

Species tree inference from gene trees is an important part of biological research. One confounding factor in estimating species trees is gene duplication and loss which can lead to gene trees with multiple copies of the same gene. In recent years there have been several new methods developed to address this problem that have substantially improved on earlier methods; however, the best performing methods (ASTRAL-Pro, ASTRID-multi, and FastMulRFS) have not yet been directly compared. In this study, we compare ASTRAL-Pro, ASTRID-multi, and FastMulRFS under a wide variety of conditions. Our study shows that while all three have very good accuracy, nearly the same under many conditions, ASTRAL-Pro and ASTRID-multi are more reliably accurate than FastMuLRFS, and that ASTRID-multi is often faster than ASTRAL-Pro. The datasets generated for this study are freely available in the Illinois Data Bank at https://databank.illinois.edu/datasets/IDB-2418574

evolutionary biology↗