Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wilke, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Wilke, T..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

RGB color indices as proxy for symbiont cell density and chlorophyll content during coral bleaching

Coral bleaching, the breakdown of the symbiosis between the coral host and endosymbiotic microalgae, is the main cause of widespread coral reef degradation. Current methods for assessing coral health based on visual appearance, such as the use of color reference cards, are limited by subjective human color perception and low resolution. Digital photography with RGB (Red, Green, Blue) color channel analyses offers a fast, non-invasive, and standardized alternative to estimate physiological parameters. However, the link between coral color and physiological parameters during bleaching may vary depending on the type of stressor. While such approaches are extensively used in plant studies, their application in estimating Symbiodiniaceae cell density and chlorophyll content in corals requires further attention. In this study, we analyzed the correlation between Symbiodiniaceae cell density and chlorophyll content across three coral species (Acropora muricata, Pocillopora verrucosa, and Stylophora pistillata) with 19 color indices derived from the RGB channels currently established as predictors of chlorophyll content in plants. Corals were exposed to three bleaching conditions (acute short-term and chronic long-term heat stress and menthol bleaching) to identify the best color indices for assessing coral health through image analysis. We found that the Red index had the strongest linear correlation with symbiont cell density and chlorophyll content across species (R2 up to 0.97), so that relative changes in this color index can be directly interpreted as corresponding changes in tissue parameters. To train a model that predicts symbiont densities of a distinct sample set using the Red index, we found 10 to 12 samples to be sufficient to achieve an accuracy of > 95 % of the models trained on the full datasets. This research contributes to improved image analysis as a reliable and non-invasive tool for monitoring, by providing guidelines for a systematic use of RGB data to interpret coral health.

ecology↗

Rapid Caspian sea level decline requires dynamic spatio-temporal conservation planning to keep biodiversity protection measures relevant

The Caspian Sea is the worlds largest landlocked waterbody, providing habitat for hundreds of endemic and migratory species, along with ecosystem services that sustain millions of people. Global warming is projected to drive declines in water levels of up to 21 m by 2100. Using geospatial analyses, we assessed the impact of sea level decline on habitats, protected areas, and human infrastructure. We show that a water level decline of just 5-10 m will critically disrupt key ecosystems, reduce existing marine protected area coverage by up to 94%, and render billions of dollars of civil and industrial infrastructure obsolete. Urgent action is needed to replace traditional static conservation planning with a pre-emptive, dynamic approach that allows protected areas to track shifting ecosystems. This will be essential to help the Caspian Seas endemic biodiversity adapt to these changes, and avoid conflicts with mitigation efforts directed at protecting human activity. Russian abstract[A][bcy][c][t][p][a][kcy][t] [Kcy][a][c][pcy][icy][jcy][c][kcy][o][e] [m][o][p][e]- [kcy][p][u][pcy][ncy][e][jcy][shcy][icy][jcy] [v] [m][icy][p][e] [v][ncy][u][t][p][e][ncy][ncy][icy][jcy] [v][o][dcy][o][e][m], [o][bcy][e][c][pcy][e][chcy][icy][v][a][yucy][shchcy][icy][jcy] [c][p][e][dcy][u] [o][bcy][icy][t][a][ncy][icy][yacy] [dcy][lcy][yacy] [c][o][t][e][ncy] [ecy][ncy][dcy][e][m][icy][chcy][ncy][ycy][khcy] [icy] [m][icy][gcy][p][icy][p][u][yucy][shchcy][icy][khcy] [v][icy][dcy][o][v], [a] [t][a][kcy][zhcy][e] [ecy][kcy][o][c][icy][c][t][e][m][ncy][ycy][e] [u][c][lcy][u][gcy][icy], [o][bcy][e][c][pcy][e][chcy][icy][v][a][yucy][shchcy][icy][e] [zhcy][icy][z][ncy][e][dcy][e][yacy][t][e][lcy][softcy][ncy][o][c][t][softcy] [m][icy][lcy][lcy][icy][o][ncy][o][v] [lcy][yucy][dcy][e][jcy]. [C][o][gcy][lcy][a][c][ncy][o] [pcy][p][o][gcy][ncy][o][z][a][m], [gcy][lcy][o][bcy][a][lcy][softcy][ncy][o][e] [pcy][o][t][e][pcy][lcy][e][ncy][icy][e] [pcy][p][icy][v][e][dcy][e][t] [kcy] [c][ncy][icy][zhcy][e][ncy][icy][yucy] [u][p][o][v][ncy][yacy] [v][o][dcy][ycy] [dcy][o] 21 [m] [kcy] 2100 [gcy][o][dcy][u]. [C] [pcy][o][m][o][shchcy][softcy][yucy] [gcy][e][o][pcy][p][o][c][t][p][a][ncy][c][t][v][e][ncy][ncy][o][gcy][o] [a][ncy][a][lcy][icy][z][a] [pcy][p][o][v][e][dcy][e][ncy][a] [o][tscy][e][ncy][kcy][a] [v][lcy][icy][yacy][ncy][icy][yacy] [c][ncy][icy][zhcy][e][ncy][icy][yacy] [u][p][o][v][ncy][yacy] [m][o][p][yacy] [ncy][a] [m][e][c][t][a] [o][bcy][icy][t][a][ncy][icy][yacy], [o][khcy][p][a][ncy][yacy][e][m][ycy][e] [t][e][p][p][icy][t][o][p][icy][icy] [icy] [o][bcy]{cyrillic small hard sign}[e][kcy][t][ycy] [icy][ncy][fe][p][a][c][t][p][u][kcy][t][u][p][ycy]. [M][ycy] [pcy][o][kcy][a][z][ycy][v][a][e][m], [chcy][t][o] [c][ncy][icy][zhcy][e][ncy][icy][e] [u][p][o][v][ncy][yacy] [v][o][dcy][ycy] [v][c][e][gcy][o] [ncy][a] 5-10 [m] [pcy][p][icy][v][e][dcy][e][t] [kcy] [kcy][p][icy][t][icy][chcy][e][c][kcy][icy][m] [ncy][a][p][u][shcy][e][ncy][icy][yacy][m] [v] [kcy][lcy][yucy][chcy][e][v][ycy][khcy] [ecy][kcy][o][c][icy][c][t][e][m][a][khcy], [c][o][kcy][p][a][t][icy][t] [o][khcy][v][a][t] [c][u][shchcy][e][c][t][v][u][yucy][shchcy][icy][khcy] [m][o][p][c][kcy][icy][khcy] [o][khcy][p][a][ncy][yacy][e][m][ycy][khcy] [p][a][jcy][o][ncy][o][v] [dcy][o] 94% [icy] [pcy][p][icy][v][e][dcy][e][t] [kcy] [v][ycy][v][o][dcy][u] [icy][z] [ecy][kcy][c][pcy][lcy][u][a][t][a][tscy][icy][icy] [gcy][p][a][zhcy][dcy][a][ncy][c][kcy][o][jcy] [icy] [pcy][p][o][m][ycy][shcy][lcy][e][ncy][ncy][o][jcy] [icy][ncy][fe][p][a][c][t][p][u][kcy][t][u][p][ycy] [c][t][o][icy][m][o][c][t][softcy][yucy] [v] [m][icy][lcy][lcy][icy][a][p][dcy][ycy] [dcy][o][lcy][lcy][a][p][o][v]. [H][e][o][bcy][khcy][o][dcy][icy][m][ycy] [bcy][e][z][o][t][lcy][a][gcy][a][t][e][lcy][softcy][ncy][ycy][e] [m][e][p][ycy] [pcy][o] [z][a][m][e][ncy][e] [t][p][a][dcy][icy][tscy][icy][o][ncy][ncy][o][gcy][o] [c][t][a][t][icy][chcy][ncy][o][gcy][o] [pcy][lcy][a][ncy][icy][p][o][v][a][ncy][icy][yacy] [pcy][p][icy][p][o][dcy][o][o][khcy][p][a][ncy][ncy][o][jcy] [dcy][e][yacy][t][e][lcy][softcy][ncy][o][c][t][icy] [u][pcy][p][e][zhcy][dcy][a][yucy][shchcy][icy][m], [dcy][icy][ncy][a][m][icy][chcy][ncy][ycy][m] [pcy][o][dcy][khcy][o][dcy][o][m], [kcy][o][t][o][p][ycy][jcy] [pcy][o][z][v][o][lcy][icy][t] [kcy][o][p][p][e][kcy][t][icy][p][o][v][a][t][softcy] [gcy][p][a][ncy][icy][tscy][ycy] [o][khcy][p][a][ncy][yacy][e][m][ycy][khcy] [p][a][jcy][o][ncy][o][v] [v][c][lcy][e][dcy] [z][a] [c][m][e][shchcy][e][ncy][icy][e][m] [ecy][kcy][o][c][icy][c][t][e][m]. [Ecy][t][o] [ncy][e][o][bcy][khcy][o][dcy][icy][m][o] [dcy][lcy][yacy] [a][dcy][a][pcy][t][a][tscy][icy][icy] [ecy][ncy][dcy][e][m][icy][chcy][ncy][o][gcy][o] [bcy][icy][o][p][a][z][ncy][o][o][bcy][p][a][z][icy][yacy] [Kcy][a][c][pcy][icy][jcy][c][kcy][o][gcy][o] [m][o][p][yacy] [kcy] [icy][z][m][e][ncy][e][ncy][icy][yacy][m], [a] [t][a][kcy][zhcy][e] [dcy][lcy][yacy] [t][o][gcy][o], [chcy][t][o][bcy][ycy] [u][c][icy][lcy][icy][yacy] [pcy][o] [e][gcy][o] [c][o][khcy][p][a][ncy][e][ncy][icy][yucy] [ncy][e] [v][c][t][u][pcy][a][lcy][icy] [v] [kcy][o][ncy][fe][lcy][icy][kcy][t] [c] [m][e][p][a][m][icy] [pcy][o] [z][a][shchcy][icy][t][e] [dcy][e][yacy][t][e][lcy][softcy][ncy][o][c][t][icy] [chcy][e][lcy][o][v][e][kcy][a].

ecology↗

Short periods of decreased water flow may modulate long-term ocean acidification in reef-building corals

Ocean acidification (OA) poses a major threat to reef-building corals. Although water flow variability is common in coral reefs and modulates coral physiology, the interactive effects of flow and OA on corals remain poorly understood. Therefore, we performed a three-month OA experiment investigating the effect of changes in flow on coral physiology. We exposed the reef-building corals Acropora cytherea, Pocillopora verrucosa, and Porites cylindrica to control (pH 8.0) and OA (pH 7.8) conditions at moderate flow (6 cm s-1) and monitored OA effects on growth. Throughout the experiment, we intermittently exposed all corals to low flow (2 cm s-1) for 1.5 h and measured their photosynthesis:photosynthesis (P:R) ratio under low and moderate flow. On average, corals under OA calcified 18 % less and grew 23 % less in surface area than those at ambient pH. We observed species-specific interactive effects of OA and flow on coral physiology. P:R ratios decreased after 12 weeks of OA in A. cytherea (22 %) and P. cylindrica (28 %) under moderate flow, but were unaffected by OA under low flow. P:R ratios were stable in P. verrucosa. These results suggest that short periods of decreased water flow may modulate OA effects on some coral species, indicating that flow variability is a factor to consider when assessing long-term effects of climate change.

physiology↗

Common types of microdebris affect the physiology of reef-building corals

Marine debris, particularly microdebris (< 1 mm) poses a potential threat to marine life, including reef-building corals. While previous research has mainly focused on the impact of single polymer microplastics, the effects of natural microdebris, composed of a mixture of materials, have not been explored. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effects of different microdebris, originating from major sources of pollution, on reef-building corals. For this, we exposed two scleractinian coral species, Pocillopora verrucosa and Stylophora pistillata, known to frequently ingest microplastics, to four types of microdebris in an 8-week laboratory experiment: fragmented environmental plastic debris, artificial fibers from clothing, residues from the automobile sector consisting of tire wear, brake abrasion, and varnish flakes, a single polymer microplastic treatment consisting of polyethylene particles, and a microdebris-free control treatment. Specifically, we (I) compared the effects of the different microdebris on coral growth, necrosis, and photosynthesis, (II) investigated the difference between the microdebris mixtures and the exposure to the single polymer treatment, and (III) identified potential mechanisms causing species-specific effects by contrasting the feeding responses of the two coral species on microdebris and natural food. We show that the fibers and tire wear had the strongest effects on coral physiology, with P. verrucosa being more affected than S. pistillata. Both species showed increased volume growth in response to the microdebris treatments, accompanied by decreased calcification in P. verrucosa. Photosynthetic efficiency of the symbionts was enhanced in both species. The species-specific physiological responses might be attributed to feeding reactions, with P. verrucosa responding significantly more often to microdebris than S. pistillata. These findings highlight the effect of different microdebris on coral physiology and the need for future studies to use particle mixtures to better mimic naturally occurring microdebris and assess its effect on corals in more detail. HighlightsO_LIThe effects of major sources of microdebris pollution on coral physiology were compared. C_LIO_LIOverall, microdebris had only minor impacts on coral physiology. C_LIO_LIArtificial fibers and tire wear caused the strongest effect on coral physiology. C_LIO_LISingle polymer and complex microdebris caused similar, yet species-specific effects. C_LIO_LISpecies-specific effects might be due to different feeding behaviors. C_LI Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/569976v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (44K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ba7ba8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c5795org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4a10deorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9983e5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

physiology↗

Interactive effects of microplastic pollution and heat stress on reef-building corals

Plastic pollution is an emerging stressor that increases pressure on ecosystems such as coral reefs that are already challenged by climate change. However, the effect of plastic pollution in combination with global warming is largely unknown. Thus, the goal of this study was to determine the cumulative effect of microplastic pollution with that of global warming on reef-building coral species and to compare the severity of both stressors. For this, we conducted a series of three controlled laboratory experiments and exposed a broad range of coral species (Acropora muricata, Montipora digitata, Porites lutea, Pocillopora verrucosa, and Stylophora pistillata) to microplastic particles in a range of concentrations (2.5-2,500 particles L-1) and mixtures (from different industrial sectors) at ambient temperatures and in combination with heat stress. We show that microplastic can occasionally have a negative effect on the corals thermal tolerance. In comparison to heat stress, however, microplastic constitutes a minor stressor. While heat stress led to decreased photosynthetic efficiency of algal symbionts, and increased bleaching, tissue necrosis, and mortality, treatment with microplastic particles had only minor effects on the physiology and health of the tested coral species at ambient temperatures. These findings underline that while efforts to reduce plastic pollution should continue, they should not replace more urgent efforts to halt global warming, which are immediately needed to preserve remaining coral reef ecosystems. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=108 SRC="FIGDIR/small/454458v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (51K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c2eeb0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c49ea6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18bab59org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9e952b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

ecology↗