Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wijsman, E. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Wijsman, E. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Multiple-testing corrections in case-control studies using identity-by-descent segments

Identity-by-descent (IBD) mapping provides complementary signals to genome-wide association studies (GWAS) when multiple causal haplotypes or variants are present, but not directly tested. However, failing to correct for multiple testing in case-control studies using IBD segments can lead to false discoveries. We propose the difference between case-case and control-control IBD rates as an IBD mapping statistic. For our hypothesis test, we use a computationally efficient approach from the stochastic processes literature to derive genome-wide significance levels that control the family-wise error rate (FWER). Whole genome simulations indicate that our method conservatively controls the FWER. Because positive selection can lead to false discoveries, we pair our IBD mapping approach with a selection scan so that one can contrast results for evidence of confounding due to recent sweeps or other mechanisms, like population structure, that increase IBD sharing. We developed automated and reproducible workflows to phase haplotypes, call local ancestry probabilities, and perform the IBD mapping scan, the former two tasks being important preprocessing steps for haplotype analyses. We applied our methods to search for Alzheimers disease (AD) risk loci in the Alzheimers Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) genome data. We identified six genome-wide significant signals of AD risk among samples genetically similar to African and European reference populations and self-identified Amish samples. Variants in the six potential risk loci we detected have previously been associated with AD, dementia, and memory decline. Three genes at two potential risk loci have already been nominated as therapeutic targets. Overall, our scalable approach makes further use of large consortia resources, which are expensive to collect but provide insights into disease mechanisms. HighlightsO_LIWe propose a computationally efficient method to address multiple testing when scanning along the genome for differences in identity-by-descent rates of case-case and control-control pairs. C_LIO_LIWhole genome simulations indicate that our method conservatively controls the desired family-wise error rate. C_LIO_LIWe performed three case-control scans from ancestry cohorts in the Alzheimers Disease Sequencing Project, detecting six genome-wide significant signals around potential risk loci. C_LIO_LIWe show that positive selection can confound IBD mapping tests in samples genetically similar to Europeans. C_LI

genetics↗

GIGI2: A Fast Approach for Parallel Genotype Imputation in Large Pedigrees

MotivationImputation of untyped SNPs has become important in Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS). There has also been a trend towards analyzing rare variants, driven by the decrease of genome sequencing costs. Rare variants are enriched in pedigrees that have many cases or extreme phenotypes. This is especially the case for large pedigrees, which makes family-based designs ideal to detect rare variants associated with complex traits. The costs of performing relatively large family-based GWAS can be significantly reduced by fully sequencing only a fraction of the pedigree and performing imputation on the remaining subjects. The program GIGI can efficiently perform imputation in large pedigrees but can be time consuming. Here, we implement GIGIs imputation approach in a new program, GIGI2, which performs imputation with computational time reduced by at least 25x on one thread and 120x on eight threads. The memory usage of GIGI2 is reduced by at least 30x. This reduction is achieved by implementing better memory layout and a better algorithm for solving the Identity by Descent graphs, as well as with additional features, including multithreading. We also make GIGI2 available as a webserver based on the same framework as the Michigan Imputation Server. AvailabilityGIGI2 is freely available online at https://cse-git.qcri.org/eullah/GIGI2 and the websever is at https://imputation.qcri.org/ Contactmsaad@hbku.edu.qa

bioinformatics↗

Quality Control and Integration of Genotypes from Two Calling Pipelines for Whole Genome Sequence Data in the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project

The Alzheimers Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 584 subjects from 111 multiplex families at three sequencing centers. Genotype calling of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion-deletion variants (indels) was performed centrally using GATK-HaplotypeCaller and Atlas V2. The ADSP Quality Control (QC) Working Group applied QC protocols to project-level variant call format files (VCFs) from each pipeline, and developed and implemented a novel protocol, termed \"consensus calling,\" to combine genotype calls from both pipelines into a single high-quality set. QC was applied to autosomal bi-allelic SNVs and indels, and included pipeline-recommended QC filters, variant-level QC, and sample-level QC. Low-quality variants or genotypes were excluded, and sample outliers were noted. Quality was assessed by examining Mendelian inconsistencies (MIs) among 67 parent-offspring pairs, and MIs were used to establish additional genotype-specific filters for GATK calls. After QC, 578 subjects remained. Pipeline-specific QC excluded ~12.0% of GATK and 14.5% of Atlas SNVs. Between pipelines, ~91% of SNV genotypes across all QCed variants were concordant; 4.23% and 4.56% of genotypes were exclusive to Atlas or GATK, respectively; the remaining ~0.01% of discordant genotypes were excluded. For indels, variant-level QC excluded ~36.8% of GATK and 35.3% of Atlas indels. Between pipelines, ~55.6% of indel genotypes were concordant; while 10.3% and 28.3% were exclusive to Atlas or GATK, respectively; and ~0.29% of discordant genotypes were. The final WGS consensus dataset contains 27,896,774 SNVs and 3,133,926 indels and is publicly available.\n\nAbbreviationsAD, Alzheimers disease; QC, Quality Control; LSSAC, Large-Scale Sequencing and Analysis Center; Broad, Broad Institute Genomics Service; Baylor, Baylor College of Medicine Human Genome Sequencing Center; WashU, Washington University-St. Louis McDonnell Genome Institute; WGS, whole genome sequencing; WES, whole exome sequencing; indel, insertion-deletion variants; VCF, variant control format; MI, Mendelian inconsistency; MC, Mendelian consistency; GWAS, genome-wide association study; VR, referent allele read depth; DP, overall read depth; MS, mapping score; GQ, genotype quality score; Ti/Tv, Transition/Transversion; CS, concordance code

genetics↗