Biology subjects

Wiencke, J. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Wiencke, J. K..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Enhanced cell deconvolution of peripheral blood using DNA methylation for high-resolution immune profiling

DNA methylation microarrays can be employed to interrogate cell-type composition in complex tissues. Here, we expand reference-based deconvolution of blood DNA methylation to include 12 leukocyte subtypes (neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes, B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ naive and memory cells, natural killer, and T regulatory cells). Including derived variables, our method provides up to 56 immune profile variables. The IDOL (IDentifying Optimal Libraries) algorithm was used to identify libraries for deconvolution of DNA methylation data both for current and retrospective platforms. The accuracy of deconvolution estimates obtained using our enhanced libraries was validated using artificial mixtures, and whole-blood DNA methylation with known cellular composition from flow cytometry. We applied our libraries to deconvolve cancer, aging, and autoimmune disease datasets. In conclusion, these libraries enable a detailed representation of immune-cell profiles in blood using only DNA and facilitate a standardized, thorough investigation of the immune system in human health and disease.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Assessment of Polygenic Architecture and Risk Prediction based on Common Variants Across Fourteen Cancers

We analyzed summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of European ancestry across fourteen cancer sites to estimate the number of common susceptibility variants (polygenicity) contributing to risk, as well as the distribution of their associated effect sizes. All cancers evaluated showed polygenicity, involving at a minimum thousands of independent susceptibility variants. For some malignancies, particularly chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL) and testicular cancer, there are a larger proportion of variants with larger effect sizes than those for other cancers. In contrast, most variants for lung and breast cancers have very small associated effect sizes. For different cancer sites, we estimate a wide range of GWAS sample sizes, required to explain 80% of GWAS heritability, varying from 60,000 cases for CLL to over 1,000,000 cases for lung cancer. The maximum relative risk achievable for subjects at the 99th risk percentile of underlying polygenic risk scores, compared to average risk, ranges from 12 for testicular to 2.5 for ovarian cancer. We show that polygenic risk scores have substantial potential for risk stratification for relatively common cancers such as breast, prostate and colon, but limited potential for other cancer sites because of modest heritability and lower disease incidence.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data

BackgroundUmbilical cord blood (UCB) is commonly used in epigenome-wide association studies of prenatal exposures. Accounting for cell type composition is critical in such studies as it reduces confounding due to the cell specificity of DNA methylation (DNAm). In the absence of cell sorting information, statistical methods can be applied to deconvolve heterogeneous cell mixtures. Among these methods, reference-based approaches leverage age appropriate cell-specific DNA-methylation profiles to estimate cellular composition. In UCB, four reference datasets comprising DNAm signatures profiled in purified cell populations have been published using the Illumina 450K and 850K EPIC arrays. These datasets are biologically and technically different, and currently there is no consensus on how to best apply them. Here, we systematically evaluate and compare these datasets and provide recommendations for reference-based UCB deconvolution.\n\nResultsWe first evaluated the four reference datasets to ascertain both the purity of the samples and the potential cell cross-contamination. We filtered samples and combined datasets to obtain a joint UCB reference. We selected deconvolution libraries using two different approaches: automatic selection using the top differentially methylated probes from the function pickCompProbes in minfi and a standardized library selected using the IDOL (Identifying Optimal Libraries) iterative algorithm. We compared the performance of each reference separately and in combination, using the two approaches for reference library selection, and validated the results in an independent cohort (Generation R Study, n=191) with matched FACS measured cell counts. Strict filtering and combination of the references significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of cell type estimates. Ultimately, the IDOL library outperformed the library from the automatic selection method implemented in pickCompProbes.\n\nConclusionThese results have important implications for epigenetic studies in UCB as implementing this method will optimally reduce confounding due to cellular heterogeneity. This work provides guidelines for future reference-based UCB deconvolution and establishes a framework for combining reference datasets in other tissues.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Cross-cancer pleiotropic associations with lung cancer risk in African Americans

BackgroundIdentifying genetic variants with pleiotropic associations across multiple cancers can reveal shared biologic pathways. Prior pleiotropic studies have primarily focused on European descent individuals. Yet population-specific genetic variation can occur and potential pleiotropic associations among diverse racial/ethnic populations could be missed. We examined cross-cancer pleiotropic associations with lung cancer risk in African Americans.\n\nMethodsWe conducted a pleiotropic analysis among 1,410 African American lung cancer cases and 2,843 controls. We examined 36,958 variants previously associated (or in linkage disequilibrium) with cancer in prior genome-wide association studies. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for age, sex, global ancestry, study site, and smoking status.\n\nResultsWe identified three novel genomic regions significantly associated (FDR-corrected p-value < 0.10) with lung cancer risk (rs336958 on 5q14.3, rs7186207 on 16q22.2, and rs11658063 on 17q12). On chromosome16q22.2, rs7186207 was significantly associated with increased risk (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.38) and functional annotation using GTEx showed rs7186207 modifies DHODH gene expression. The risk allele at rs336958 on 5q14.3 was associated with reduced lung cancer risk (OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.56-0.82), while the risk allele at rs11658063 on 17q12 was associated with increased risk (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.11-1.39).\n\nConclusionWe identified novel associations on chromosomes 5q14.3, 16q22.2, and 17q12, which contain HNF1B, DHODH, and HAPLN1 genes, respectively. SNPs within these regions have been previously associated with multiple cancers. This is the first study to examine cross-cancer pleiotropic associations for lung cancer in African Americans.\n\nImpactOur findings demonstrate novel cross-cancer pleiotropic associations with lung cancer risk in African Americans.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Sex-specific genome-wide association study in glioma identifies new risk locus at 3p21.31 in females, and finds sex-differences in risk at 8q24.21

Incidence of glioma is approximately 50% higher in males. Previous analyses have examined exposures related to sex hormones in women as potential protective factors for these tumors, with inconsistent results. Previous glioma genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have not stratified by sex. Potential sex-specific genetic effects were assessed in autosomal SNPs and sex chromosome variants for all glioma, GBM and non-GBM patients using data from four previous glioma GWAS. Datasets were analyzed using sex-stratified logistic regression models and combined using meta-analysis. There were 4,831 male cases, 5,216 male controls, 3,206 female cases and 5,470 female controls. A significant association was detected at rs11979158 (7p11.2) in males only. Association at rs55705857 (8q24.21) was stronger in females than in males. A large region on 3p21.31 was identified with significant association in females only. The identified differences in effect of risk variants do not fully explain the observed incidence difference in glioma by sex.

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2017

Sex-specific gene and pathway modeling of inherited glioma risk

BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 25 risk variants for glioma, which explain ~30% of heritable risk. Most glioma histologies occur with significantly higher incidence in males. A sex-stratified analysis ide7ntified sex-specific glioma risk variants, and further analyses using gene- and pathway-based approaches may further elucidate risk variation by sex.\n\nMethodsResults from the Glioma International Case-Control Study were used as a testing set, and results from three GWAS were combined via meta-analysis and used as a validation set. Using summary statistics for autosomal SNPs found to be nominally significant (p<0.01) in a previous meta-analysis and X chromosome SNPs with nominally significant association (p<0.01), three algorithms (Pascal, BimBam, and GATES) were used to generate gene-scores, and Pascal was used to generate pathway scores. Results were considered significant when p<3.3x10-6 in [2/3] algorithms.\n\nResults25 genes within five regions and 19 genes within six regions reached the set significance threshold in at least 2/3 algorithms in males and females, respectively. EGFR and RTEL1-TNFRSF6B were significantly associated with all glioma and glioblastoma in males only, and a female-specific association in TERT, all of which remained nominally significant after conditioning on known risk loci. There were nominal associations with the Telomeres, Telomerase, Cellular Aging, and Immortality pathway in both males and females.\n\nConclusionsThese results suggest that there may be biologically relevant significant differences by sex in genetic risk for glioma. Additional gene- and pathway-based analyses may further elucidate the biological processes through which this risk is conferred.

epidemiology↗