Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wieland, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Wieland, V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Large language models complement established workflows for mechanistic model construction and refinement in systems biology

Mechanistic models provide a framework for describing, understanding, and predicting biological processes, but their development requires an interdisciplinary team with expertise in biology, mathematics, and computation. Here we present Octomod, a multi-agent workflow based on large language models (LLMs) that integrates biological knowledge retrieval, model construction, parameter estimation, and hypothesis testing. Built on established software tools, including AMICI and pyPESTO, and community standards, including SBML and PEtab, Octomod supports model development and refinement through natural-language interaction with a user. The agents' proposals must pass defined checks and the user's decision before they are used. Every input, model, check, and decision is recorded, so that model building remains transparent and reproducible. We applied Octomod to four problems. Three used published data and differ in model size and in how much the user guided the run: Octomod constructed a model that matched a published model without user guidance, supported the interactive refinement of a gene-regulatory model, and built models of cell-cell communication that explained the responses of five immune cell types to different stimuli. In the fourth application, on newly generated and unpublished lipidomics data, Octomod helped to determine which processes the measurements could inform, identify unresolved label fluxes, and reduce a supplied model to those processes. Together, these results show how LLMs can strengthen and complement established workflows for constructing and refining biologically informed models.

systems biology↗

Mathematical Modeling of the Canonical Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor involved in xenobiotic sensing, as well as development, immunity, and tissue homeostasis. AhR signaling can proceed through a canonical and non-canonical pathway; the present study focuses on the canonical pathway. While ligand-dependent differences in binding affinities and direct ligand degradation kinetics are well known, and subtle differences in ligand binding can shape downstream signaling, it is still unclear which biochemical reaction steps within the canonical pathway are responsible for distinct ligand-specific transcriptional responses. Here, we developed a mechanistic ordinary differential equation model of the canonical AhR pathway. We calibrated the model to time-resolved qPCR measurements of Cyp1a1 and Ahrr mRNA in mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophages exposed to structurally diverse, environmentally relevant ligands with known immunomodulatory activity (3-methylcholanthrene, indolo[3,2-b]carbazole, and bisphenol A) using global optimization under a heteroskedastic likelihood. To dissect ligand specificity, we evaluated 528 candidate models that allow one or two ligand-involving reaction rate constants to vary. Akaike-based model selection reveals a dominant dynamical regime governed by promoter occupancy and target-gene mRNA synthesis, indicating that ligand-specific transcriptional responses are primarily encoded at the level of transcriptional regulation rather than upstream signaling events. The resulting model is made available in SBML and PEtab formats for reproducibility, and to enable further research into whether ligand-specific effects are conserved or rewired across cell types.

systems biology↗

Combined Stochastic Models for the Evaluation of Cancer Progression and Patient Trajectories

Cancer is a major burden of disease around the globe and one of the leading causes of premature death. The key to improve patient outcomes in modern clinical cancer research is to gain insights into dynamics underlying cancer evolution in order to facilitate the search for effective therapies. However, most cancer data analysis tools are designed for controlled trials and cannot leverage routine clinical data, which are available in far greater quantities. In addition, many cancer models focus on single disease processes in isolation, disregarding interaction This work proposes a unified stochastic modelling framework for cancer progression that combines (stochastic) processes for tumour growth, metastatic seeding, and patient survival to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer progression. In addition, our models aim to use non-equidistantly sampled data collected in clinical routine to analyse the whole patient trajectory over the course of the disease. The model formulation features closed-form expressions of the likelihood functions for parameter inference from clinical data. The efficacy of our model approach is demonstrated through a simulation study involving four exemplary models, which utilise both analytic and numerical likelihoods. The results of the simulation studies demonstrate the accuracy and computational efficiency of the analytic likelihood formulations. We found that estimation can retrieve the correct model parameters and reveal the underlying data dynamics, and that this modelling framework is flexible in choosing the precise parameterisation. This work can serve as a foundation for the development of combined stochastic models for guiding personalized therapies in oncology.

systems biology↗