Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Whalen, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Whalen, A..

17 recordsLinked to original sources

Thermal Effects on Neurons During Stimulation of the Brain

All artificial stimulation of the brain deposits thermal energy in the brain. This occurs through either Joule heating of the conductors carrying current through electrodes and magnetic coils, or through dissipation of energy in the conductive brain. Similarly, temperature affects all biological processes and chemical reactions. Although electrical interaction with brain tissue is inseparable from thermal effects when electrodes are used, magnetic induction enables us to separate Joule heating from induction effects by contrasting AC and DC driving of magnetic coils using the same energy deposition within the conductors. Since mammalian cortical neurons have no known sensitivity to static magnetic fields, and if there is no evidence of effect on spike timing to oscillating magnetic fields, we can presume that the induced electrical currents within the brain are below the molecular shot noise where any interaction with tissue is purely thermal. In this study, we examined a range of frequencies produced from micromagnetic coils operating below the molecular shot noise threshold for electrical interaction with single neurons. We found that small temperature increases and decreases of 1{degrees}C caused consistent transient suppression and excitation of neurons during temperature change. Numerical modeling of the biophysics demonstrated that the Na-K pump, and to a lesser extent the Nernst potential, could account for these transient effects. Such effects are dependent upon compartmental ion fluxes, and the rate of temperature change. A new bifurcation is described in the model dynamics that accounts for the transient suppression and excitation; in addition, we note the remarkable similarity of this bifurcations rate dependency with other thermal rate-dependent tipping points in planetary warming dynamics. Furthermore, bifurcations in the steady state dynamics leading to stable firing suppression are described for slightly higher temperatures. These experimental and theoretical findings demonstrate that stimulation of the brain must take into account small thermal effects that are ubiquitously present in electrical and magnetic stimulation. More sophisticated models of electrical current interaction with neurons combined with thermal effects will be required in order to more accurately enable model-based control of neuronal circuitry.

biophysics↗

Genomic prediction with whole-genome sequence data in intensely selected pig lines

BackgroundEarly simulations indicated that whole-genome sequence data (WGS) could improve genomic prediction accuracy and its persistence across generations and breeds. However, empirical results have been ambiguous so far. Large data sets that capture most of the genome diversity in a population must be assembled so that allele substitution effects are estimated with high accuracy. The objectives of this study were to use a large pig dataset to assess the benefits of using WGS for genomic prediction compared to using commercial marker arrays, to identify scenarios in which WGS provides the largest advantage, and to identify potential pitfalls for its effective implementation. MethodsWe sequenced 6,931 individuals from seven commercial pig lines with different numerical size. Genotypes of 32.8 million variants were imputed for 396,100 individuals (17,224 to 104,661 per line). We used BayesR to perform genomic prediction for eight complex traits. Genomic predictions were performed using either data from a marker array or variants preselected from WGS based on association tests. ResultsThe prediction accuracy with each set of preselected WGS variants was not robust across traits and lines and the improvements in prediction accuracy that we achieved so far with WGS compared to marker arrays were generally small. The most favourable results for WGS were obtained when the largest training sets were available and used to preselect variants with statistically significant associations to the trait for augmenting the established marker array. With this method and training sets of around 80k individuals, average improvements of genomic prediction accuracy of 0.025 were observed in within-line scenarios. ConclusionsOur results showed that WGS has a small potential to improve genomic prediction accuracy compared to marker arrays in intensely selected pig lines in some settings. Thus, although we expect that more robust improvements could be attained with a combination of larger training sets and optimised pipelines, the use of WGS in the current implementations of genomic prediction should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis against the cost of generating WGS at a large scale.

genomics↗

Performance of genetic imputation across commercial crop species

We show that accurate imputation can be carried out in three commercial plant species (maize, sugar beet and wheat) and that accurate imputation does not require a pedigree, although pedigree information can improve accuracy and speed. Our approach uses a hidden Markov model to build a haplotype library from individuals genotyped at high-density and then uses this library to impute low-density genotyped individuals to high-density. To build the library, we use founders when the pedigree is known, or a sample of progeny when the pedigree is unknown. Without a pedigree, and with 50 individuals genotyped at high-density and 100 low-density markers per chromosome, the median accuracies were 0.97 (maize), 0.96 (sugar beet), and 0.94 (wheat). We obtained similar accuracies with a pedigree. For biparental crosses with 100 markers per chromosome, median accuracies were 0.96 (maize), 0.96 (sugar beet) and 0.94 (wheat). For the imputation scenarios without a pedigree, we compared accuracies with those obtained by running Beagle 5.1. In all but one scenario, our method outperformed Beagle. We believe that plant breeders can effectively apply imputation in many crop species.

genetics↗

Crosstalk between guanosine nucleotides regulates cellular heterogeneity in protein synthesis during nutrient limitation

Phenotypic heterogeneity of microbial populations can facilitate survival in dynamic environments by generating sub-populations of cells that may have differential fitness in a future environment. Bacillus subtilis cultures experiencing nutrient limitation contain distinct sub-populations of cells exhibiting either comparatively high or low protein synthesis activity. This heterogeneity requires the production of phosphorylated guanosine nucleotides (pp)ppGpp by three synthases: SasA, SasB, and RelA. Here we show that these enzymes differentially affect this bimodality: RelA and SasB are necessary to generate the sub-population of cells exhibiting low protein synthesis whereas SasA is necessary to generate cells exhibiting comparatively higher protein synthesis. The RelA product (pppGpp) allosterically activates SasB and we find, in contrast, that the SasA product (pGpp) competitively inhibits this activation. Finally, we provide in vivo evidence that this antagonistic interaction mediates the observed heterogeneity in protein synthesis. This work therefore identifies the mechanism underlying phenotypic heterogeneity in the central physiological process of protein synthesis. Author SummaryUpon encountering conditions that are unfavorable to growth, such as nutrient limitation, bacteria enter into a quiescent phenotype that is mediated by group of guanosine nucleotides collectively known as (pp)pGpp. These nucleotides direct the down-regulation of energy intensive processes and are essential for a striking heterogeneity in protein synthesis observed during exit from rapid growth. Here, we show that a network of (pp)pGpp synthases is responsible for this heterogeneity and describe a mechanism that allows for the integration of multiple signals into the decision to down regulate the most energy intensive process in a cell.

microbiology↗

AlphaImpute2: Fast and accurate pedigree and population based imputation for hundreds of thousands of individuals in livestock populations

In this paper we present a new imputation algorithm, AlphaImpute2, which performs fast and accurate pedigree and population based imputation for livestock populations of hundreds of thousands of individuals. Genetic imputation is a tool used in genetics to decrease the cost of genotyping a population, by genotyping a small number of individuals at high-density and the remaining individuals at low-density. Shared haplotype segments between the high-density and low-density individuals can then be used to fill in the missing genotypes of the low-density individuals. As the size of genetics datasets have grown, the computational cost of performing imputation has increased, particularly in agricultural breeding programs where there might be hundreds of thousands of genotyped individuals. To address this issue, we present a new imputation algorithm, AlphaImpute2, which performs population imputation by using a particle based approximation to the Li and Stephens which exploits the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform, and performs pedigree imputation using an approximate version of multi-locus iterative peeling. We tested AlphaImpute2 on four simulated datasets designed to mimic the pedigrees found in a real pig breeding program. We compared AlphaImpute2 to AlphaImpute, AlphaPeel, findhap version 4, and Beagle 5.1. We found that AlphaImpute2 had the highest accuracy, with an accuracy of 0.993 for low-density individuals on the pedigree with 107,000 individuals, compared to an accuracy of 0.942 for Beagle 5.1, 0.940 for AlphaImpute, and 0.801 for findhap. AlphaImpute2 was also the fastest software tested, with a runtime of 105 minutes a pedigree of 107,000 individuals and 5,000 markers was 105 minutes, compared to 190 minutes for Beagle 5.1, 395 minutes for findhap, and 7,859 minutes AlphaImpute. We believe that AlphaImpute2 will enable fast and accurate large scale imputation for agricultural populations as they scale to hundreds of thousands or millions of genotyped individuals.

genetics↗

Fitness benefits of providing services to others: Sociality predicts survival in a neotropical primate

Across multiple species of social mammals, a growing number of studies have found that that individual sociality is associated with survival. In long-lived species, like primates, lifespan is one of the main components of fitness. We used 18 years of data from the Lomas Barbudal Monkey project to quantify social integration in 11 capuchin (Cebus capucinus) groups and tested whether female survivorship was associated with females tendencies to interact with three types of partners: (1) all group members, (2) adult females, (3) adult males. We found strong evidence that females who engaged more with other females in affiliative interactions and foraged in close proximity experienced increased survivorship. We found some weak evidence that females might also benefit from engaging in more support in agonistic contexts with other females. These benefits were evident in models that account for the females rank and group size. Female interactions with all group members also increased survival, but the estimates of the effects were more uncertain. In interactions with adult males, only females who provided more grooming to males survived longer. The results presented here suggest that social integration may result in survival-related benefits. Females might enjoy these benefits through exchanging grooming for other currencies, such as coalitionary support or tolerance.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Genetics of recombination rate variation in the pig

BackgroundIn this paper, we estimated recombination rate variation within the genome and between individuals in the pig using multiocus iterative peeling for 150,000 pigs across nine genotyped pedigrees. We used this to estimate the heritability of recombination and perform a genome-wide association study of recombination in the pig. ResultsOur results confirmed known features of the pig recombination landscape, including differences in chromosome length, and marked sex differences. The recombination landscape was repeatable between lines, but at the same time, the lines also showed differences in average genome-wide recombination rate. The heritability of genome-wide recombination was low but non-zero (on average 0.07 for females and 0.05 for males). We found three genomic regions associated with recombination rate, one of them harbouring the RNF212 gene, previously associated with recombination rate in several other species. ConclusionOur results from the pig agree with the picture of recombination rate variation in vertebrates, with low but nonzero heritability, and a major locus that is homologous to one detected in several other species. This work also highlights the utility of using large-scale livestock data to understand biological processes.

genetics↗

Using high-throughput phenotypes to enable genomic selection by inferring genotypes

In this paper we develop and test a method which uses high-throughput phenotypes to infer the genotypes of an individual. The inferred genotypes can then be used to perform genomic selection. Previous methods which used high-throughput phenotype data to increase the accuracy of selection assumed that the high-throughput phenotypes correlate with selection targets. When this is not the case, we show that the high-throughput phenotypes can be used to determine which haplotypes an individual inherited from their parents, and thereby infer the individuals genotypes. We tested this method in two simulations. In the first simulation, we explored, how the accuracy of the inferred genotypes depended on the high-throughput phenotypes used and the genome of the species analysed. In the second simulation we explored whether using this method could increase genetic gain a plant breeding program by enabling genomic selection on non-genotyped individuals. In the first simulation, we found that genotype accuracy was higher if more high-throughput phenotypes were used and if those phenotypes had higher heritability. We also found that genotype accuracy decreased with an increasing size of the species genome. In the second simulation, we found that the inferred genotypes could be used to enable genomic selection on non-genotyped individuals and increase genetic gain compared to random selection, or in some scenarios phenotypic selection. This method presents a novel way for using high-throughput phenotype data in breeding programs. As the quality of high-throughput phenotypes increases and the cost decreases, this method may enable the use of genomic selection on large numbers of non-genotyped individuals.

genetics↗

AlphaFamImpute: high accuracy imputation in full-sib families from genotype-by-sequencing data

SummaryAlphaFamImpute is an imputation package for calling, phasing, and imputing genome-wide genotypes in outbred full-sib families from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array and genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) data. GBS data is increasingly being used to genotype individuals, especially when SNP arrays do not exist for a population of interest. Low-coverage GBS produces data with a large number of missing or incorrect naive genotype calls, which can be improved by identifying shared haplotype segments between full-sib individuals. Here we present AlphaFamImpute, an algorithm specifically designed to exploit the genetic structure of full-sib families. It performs imputation using a two-step approach. In the first step it phases and imputes parental genotypes based on the segregation states of their offspring (that is, which pair of parental haplotypes the offspring inherited). In the second step it phases and imputes the offspring genotypes by detecting which haplotype segments the offspring inherited from their parents. With a series of simulations we find that AlphaFamImpute obtains high accuracy genotypes, even when the parents are not genotyped and individuals are sequenced at less than 1x coverage. Availability and implementationAlphaFamImpute is available as a Python package from the AlphaGenes website, http://www.AlphaGenes.roslin.ed.ac.uk/AlphaFamImpute. Contactawhalen@roslin.ed.ac.uk Supplementary informationA complete description of the methods is available in the supplementary information.

genetics↗

Evaluation of sequencing strategies for whole-genome imputation with hybrid peeling

BackgroundFor assembling large whole-genome sequence datasets to be used routinely in research and breeding, the sequencing strategy should be adapted to the methods that will later be used for variant discovery and imputation. In this study we used simulation to explore the impact that the sequencing strategy and level of sequencing investment have on the overall accuracy of imputation using hybrid peeling, a pedigree-based imputation method well-suited for large livestock populations.\n\nMethodsWe simulated marker array and whole-genome sequence data for fifteen populations with simulated or real pedigrees that had different structures. In these populations we evaluated the effect on imputation accuracy of seven methods for selecting which individuals to sequence, the generation of the pedigree to which the sequenced individuals belonged, the use of variable or uniform coverage, and the trade-off between the number of sequenced individuals and their sequencing coverage. For each population we considered four levels of investment in sequencing that were proportional to the size of the population.\n\nResultsImputation accuracy largely depended on pedigree depth. The distribution of the sequenced individuals across the generations of the pedigree underlay the performance of the different methods used to select individuals to sequence. Additionally, it was critical to balance high imputation accuracy in early generations as well as in late generations. Imputation accuracy was highest with a uniform coverage across the sequenced individuals of around 2x rather than variable coverage. An investment equivalent to the cost of sequencing 2% of the population at 2x provided high imputation accuracy. The gain in imputation accuracy from additional investment diminished with larger populations and larger levels of investment. However, to achieve the same imputation accuracy, a proportionally greater investment must be used in the smaller populations compared to the larger ones.\n\nConclusionsSuitable sequencing strategies for subsequent imputation with hybrid peeling involve sequencing around 2% of the population at a uniform coverage around 2x, distributed preferably from the third generation of the pedigree onwards. Such sequencing strategies are beneficial for generating whole-genome sequence data in populations with deep pedigrees of closely related individuals.

genomics↗

Accuracy of whole-genome sequence imputation using hybrid peeling in large pedigreed livestock populations

BackgroundWe demonstrate high accuracy of whole-genome sequence imputation in large livestock populations where only a small fraction of individuals (2%) had been sequenced, mostly at low coverage.\n\nMethodsWe used data from four pig populations of different sizes (18,349 to 107,815 individuals) that were broadly genotyped at densities between 15,000 and 75,000 markers genome-wide. Around 2% of the individuals in each population were sequenced (most at 1x or 2x and a small fraction at 30x; average coverage per individual: 4x). We imputed whole-genome sequence with hybrid peeling. We evaluated the imputation accuracy by removing the sequence data of a total of 284 individuals that had been sequenced at high coverage, using a leave-one-out design. We complemented these results with simulated data that mimicked the sequencing strategy used in the real populations to quantify the factors that affected the individual-wise and variant-wise imputation accuracies using regression trees.\n\nResultsImputation accuracy was high for the majority of individuals in all four populations (median individual-wise correlation was 0.97). Individuals in the earliest generations of each population had lower accuracy than the rest, likely due to the lack of marker array data for themselves and their ancestors. The main factors that determined the individual-wise imputation accuracy were the genotyping status of the individual, the availability of marker array data for immediate ancestors, and the degree of connectedness of an individual to the rest of the population, but sequencing coverage had no effect. The main factors that determined variant-wise imputation accuracy were the minor allele frequency and the number of individuals with sequencing coverage at each variant site. These results were validated with the empirical observations.\n\nConclusionsThe coupling of an appropriate sequencing strategy and imputation method, such as described and validated here, is a powerful strategy for generating whole-genome sequence data in large pedigreed populations with high accuracy. This is a critical step for the successful implementation of whole-genome sequence data for genomic predictions and fine-mapping of causal variants.

genomics↗

A family-based phasing algorithm for sequence data

This paper describes a family-based phasing algorithm, for variable-coverage sequence data, that first minimises phasing errors and then maximises the proportion of alleles phased. This algorithm is one of the essential tools that underpin an overall strategy for generating highly accurate sequence data on whole populations at low cost.\n\nThe algorithm is called AlphaFamSeq. It uses sequence data on the focal individual and at least two generations of ancestors to phase alleles. In the first step, AlphaFamSeq calculates allele probabilities using iterative peeling. In subsequent steps, the alleles are phased using heuristics deriving information from the sequence data of parents, grandparents and progenies and, if available, from other families in the pedigree. AlphaFamSeq was tested on a range of simulated data sets.\n\nAlphaFamSeq gives low phasing error rates and, if there is sufficient sequence information and haplotype sharing amongst individuals, it can give a high yield of correctly phased alleles.\n\nThe allele threshold had a large effect and window size had a small effect on performance. When all individuals in a single family were sequenced at different coverages the highest correctly phased alleles reached 90% of the possible maximum (98.9%) at ~1/6 of the maximum aggregate coverage. Adding sequence information from other related individuals increased the percentage of correctly phased alleles. Imputation performance was high across all allele frequencies (average correlation by marker of 0.94), except for a slight decrease at very low frequencies ([≤]0.01 MAF).\n\nWithin an overall strategy for generating highly accurate sequence data on whole populations at low cost the role of AlphaFamSeq is to provide very accurately phased haplotypes on focal individuals, who are individuals whose haplotypes are very common in the population.

genomics↗

Family-specific genotype arrays increase the accuracy of pedigree based imputation at very low marker densities

In this paper we evaluate the performance of using a family-specific low-density genotype arrays to increase the accuracy of pedigree based imputation. Genotype imputation is a widely used tool that decreases the costs of genotyping a population by genotyping the majority of individuals using a low-density array and using statistical regularities between the low-density and high-density individuals to fill in the missing genotypes. Previous work on population based imputation has found that it is possible to increase the accuracy of imputation by maximizing the number of informative markers on an array. In the context of pedigree based imputation, where the informativeness of a marker depends only on the genotypes of an individuals parents, it may be beneficial to select the markers on each low-density array on a family-by-family basis. In this paper we examined four family-specific low-density marker selection strategies, and evaluated their performance in the context of a real pig breeding dataset. We found that family-specific or sire-specific arrays could increase imputation accuracy by 0.11 at 1 marker per chromosome, by 0.027 at 25 markers per chromosome and by 0.007 at 100 markers per chromosome. These results suggest that there may be a room to use family-specific genotyping for very-low-density arrays particularly if a given sire or sire-dam pairing have a large number of offspring.

genetics↗

Social learning strategies regulate the wisdom and madness of interactive online crowds

Why groups of individuals sometimes exhibit collective wisdom and other times maladaptive herding is an enduring conundrum. Here we show that this apparent conflict is regulated by the social learning strategies deployed. We examined the patterns of human social learning through an interactive online experiment with 699 participants, varying both task uncertainty and group size, then used hierarchical Bayesian model-ftting to identify the individual learning strategies exhibited by participants. Challenging tasks elicit greater conformity amongst individuals, with rates of copying increasing with group size, leading to high probabilities of herding amongst large groups confronted with uncertainty. Conversely, the reduced social learning of small groups, and the greater probability that social information would be accurate for less-challenging tasks, generated wisdom of the crowd effects in other circumstances. Our model-based approach provides evidence that the likelihood of collective intelligence versus herding can be predicted, resolving a longstanding puzzle in the literature.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Parentage assignment with low density array data and low coverage sequence data

In this paper we evaluate using genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) data to perform parentage assignment in lieu of traditional array data. The use of GBS data raises two issues: First, for low-coverage GBS data, it may not be possible to call the genotype at many loci, a critical first step for detecting opposing homozygous markers. Second, the amount of sequencing coverage may vary across individuals, making it challenging to directly compare the likelihood scores between putative parents. To address these issues we extend the probabilistic framework of Huisman (2017) and evaluate putative parents by comparing their (potentially noisy) genotypes to a series of proposal distributions. These distributions describe the expected genotype probabilities for the relatives of an individual. We assign putative parents as a parent if they are classified as a parent (as opposed to e.g., an unrelated individual), and if the assignment score passes a threshold. We evaluated this method on simulated data and found that (1) high-coverage GBS data performs similarly to array data and requires only a small number of markers to correctly assign parents and (2) low-coverage GBS data (as low as 0.1x) can also be used, provided that it is obtained across a large number of markers. When analysing the low-coverage GBS data, we also found a high number of false positives if the true parent is not contained within the list of candidate parents, but that this false positive rate can be greatly reduced by hand tuning the assignment threshold. We provide this parentage assignment method as a standalone program called AlphaAssign.

genetics↗

Hybrid peeling for fast and accurate calling, phasing, and imputation with sequence data of any coverage in pedigrees

In this paper we extend multi-locus iterative peeling to be a computationally efficient method for calling, phasing, and imputing sequence data of any coverage in small or large pedigrees. Our method, called hybrid peeling, uses multi-locus iterative peeling to estimate shared chromosome segments between parents and their offspring, and then uses single-locus iterative peeling to aggregate genomic information across multiple generations. Using a synthetic dataset, we first analysed the performance of hybrid peeling for calling and phasing alleles in disconnected families, families which contained only a focal individual and its parents and grandparents. Second, we analysed the performance of hybrid peeling for calling and phasing alleles in the context of the full pedigree. Third, we analysed the performance of hybrid peeling for imputing whole genome sequence data to the remaining individuals in the population. We found that hybrid peeling substantially increase the number of genotypes that were called and phased by leveraging sequence information on related individuals. The calling rate and accuracy increased when the full pedigree was used compared to a reduced pedigree of just parents and grandparents. Finally, hybrid peeling accurately imputed whole genome sequence information to non-sequenced individuals. We believe that this algorithm will enable the generation of low cost and high accuracy whole genome sequence data in many pedigreed populations. We are making this algorithm available as a standalone program called AlphaPeel.

genetics↗

Assessment of the performance of different hidden Markov models for imputation in animal breeding

In this paper we review the performance of various hidden Markov model-based imputation methods in animal breeding populations. Traditionally, heuristic-based imputation methods have been used for imputation in large animal populations due to their computational efficiency, scalability, and accuracy. However, recent advances in the area of human genetics have increased the ability of probabilistic hidden Markov model methods to perform accurate phasing and imputation in large populations. These advances may enable these methods to be useful for routine use in large animal populations. To test this, we evaluate here the accuracy and computational cost of several methods in a series of simulated populations and a real animal population. We first tested single-step (diploid) imputation, which performs both phasing and imputation. Then we tested pre-phasing followed by haploid imputation. We tested four diploid imputation methods (fastPHASE, Beagle v4.0, IMPUTE2, and MaCH), three phasing methods, (SHAPEIT2, HAPI-UR, and Eagle2), and three haploid imputation methods (IMPUTE2, Beagle v4.1, and minimac3). We found that performing pre-phasing and haploid imputation was faster and more accurate than diploid imputation. In particular, we found that pre-phasing with Eagle2 or HAPI-UR and imputing with minimac3 or IMPUTE2 gave the highest accuracies in both simulated and real data.

genetics↗