Westbrook, T. F. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2022

WDR5 promotes breast cancer growth and metastasis via KMT2-independent translation regulation

Metastatic breast cancer remains a major cause of cancer related deaths in women and there are few effective therapies against this advanced disease. Emerging evidence suggests that key steps of tumor progression and metastasis are controlled by reversible epigenetic mechanisms. Using an in vivo genetic screen, we identified WDR5 as an actionable epigenetic regulator that is required for metastatic progression in models of triple-negative breast cancer. We found that knockdown of WDR5 in breast cancer cells independently impaired their tumorigenic as well as metastatic capabilities. Mechanistically, WDR5 promotes cell growth by increasing ribosomal gene expression and translation efficiency in a KMT2-independent manner. Consistently, pharmacological inhibition or degradation of WDR5 impedes cellular translation rate and the clonogenic ability of breast cancer cells. Furthermore, combination of WDR5-targeting with mTOR inhibitors leads to potent suppression of translation and proliferation of breast cancer cells. These results reveal novel therapeutic strategies to treat metastatic breast cancer.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Tumor suppressor PLK2 may serve as a biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer for improved response to PLK1 therapeutics

Polo-like kinase (PLK) family members play important roles in cell cycle regulation. The founding member PLK1 is oncogenic and preclinically validated as a cancer therapeutic target. Paradoxically, PLK2 (chromosome 5q11.2) is frequently deleted in human breast cancers, preferentially in basal-like and triple-negative breast cancer subtypes. Here, we found that PLK2 was tumor suppressive in breast cancer and knockdown of PLK1 rescued phenotypes induced by PLK2-loss both in vitro and in vivo. We also demonstrated that PLK2 directly interacted with PLK1 at prometaphase and that mutations in the kinase domain of PLK2, but not polo-box binding domains, changed their interaction pattern. Furthermore, treatment of syngeneic transplantation mouse tumor models and patient-derived xenografts using the PLK1 inhibitor volasertib alone, or in combination with carboplatin, indicated that PLK2-low breast tumors had a significantly better response to these drugs. Re-expression of PLK2 in an inducible PLK2-null mouse model reduced the therapeutic efficacy of volasertib. Taken together, our data suggest PLK2 loss may serve as a biomarker to predict response to PLK1 therapeutics, alone and in combination with chemotherapy. SignificanceThe tumor suppressive role of PLK2, and its relationship with the oncogene PLK1, provide a mechanistic rationalization to use PLK1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy to treat PLK2 low/deleted tumors. TNBC, and other cancers with low PLK2 expression, are such candidates to leverage precision medicine to identify patients who might benefit from treatment with these inhibitors.

cancer biology↗