Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Weisbart, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Weisbart, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

High-dimensional phenotyping to define the genetic basis of cellular morphology

The morphology of cells is dynamic and mediated by genetic and environmental factors. Characterizing how genetic variation impacts cell morphology can provide an important link between disease association and cellular function. Here, we combined genomic and high-content imaging approaches on iPSCs from 297 unique donors to investigate the relationship between genetic variants and cellular morphology to map what we term cell morphological quantitative trait loci (cmQTLs). We identified novel associations between rare protein altering variants in WASF2, TSPAN15, and PRLR with several morphological traits related to cell shape, nucleic granularity, and mitochondrial distribution. Knockdown of these genes by CRISPRi confirmed their role in cell morphology. Analysis of common variants yielded one significant association and nominated over 300 variants with suggestive evidence (P<10-6) of association with one or more morphology traits. Our results showed that, similar to other molecular phenotypes, morphological profiling can yield insight about the function of genes and variants.

genomics↗

Optimizing the Cell Painting assay for image-based profiling

In image-based profiling, software extracts thousands of morphological features of cells from multi-channel fluorescence microscopy images, yielding single-cell profiles that can be used for basic research and drug discovery. Powerful applications have been proven, including clustering chemical and genetic perturbations based on their similar morphological impact, identifying disease phenotypes by observing differences in profiles between healthy and diseased cells, and predicting assay outcomes using machine learning, among many others. Here we provide an updated protocol for the most popular assay for image-based profiling, Cell Painting. Introduced in 2013, it uses six stains imaged in five channels and labels eight diverse components of the cell: DNA, cytoplasmic RNA, nucleoli, actin, Golgi apparatus, plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria. The original protocol was updated in 2016 based on several years experience running it at two sites, after optimizing it by visual stain quality. Here we describe the work of the Joint Undertaking for Morphological Profiling (JUMP) Cell Painting Consortium, aiming to improve upon the assay via quantitative optimization, based on the measured ability of the assay to detect morphological phenotypes and group similar perturbations together. We find that the assay gives very robust outputs despite a variety of changes to the protocol and that two vendors dyes work equivalently well. We present Cell Painting version 3, in which some steps are simplified and several stain concentrations can be reduced, saving costs. Cell culture and image acquisition take 1-2 weeks for a typically sized batch of 20 or fewer plates; feature extraction and data analysis take an additional 1-2 weeks. Key references using this protocolVirtual screening for small-molecule pathway regulators by image-profile matching (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.08.003) - recent work examining the ability to use collected Cell Painting profiles to screen for regulators of a number of diverse biological pathways. JUMP Cell Painting dataset: images and profiles from two billion cells perturbed by 140,000 chemical and genetic perturbations (DOI) - the description of the main JUMP master public data set, using this protocol in the production of >200 TB of image data and >200 TB of measured profiles. Key data used in this protocolCell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes (https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.105) - this paper provides the first step-by-step Cell Painting protocol ever released.

bioinformatics↗