Biology subjects

Weigand, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Weigand, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

On the Interaction of Biopotential Sensing and Right Leg Drive System with Electro-Quasistatic Human Body Communication

Continuous long-term sensing of biopotential signals is vital to facilitate accurate diagnosis. The current state of the art in wearable health monitoring relies on radiative technology for communication. Due to their radiative nature, these systems result in lossy and inefficient transmission, limiting the devices life span. Human Body Communication has emerged as an energy-efficient secure communication modality, and literature has shown body communication to transmit biopotential signals at 100x lower power than traditional radiative technologies. Unlike radiative communication that uses airwaves, HBC, specifically Capacitive Electro-Quasistatic HBC (EQS-HBC), couple signals and confine them within the human body. In Capacitive EQS-HBC, the transmitter uses an electrode to modulate the body potential to transmit data. The modulation of body potential by HBC raises the following concerns. Will HBC transmissions affect the quality of biopotential signals sensed from the body? Additionally, since biopotential sensing systems commonly use Right Leg Drive (RLD) to bias body potential, there is also a concern if RLD can affect the quality of HBC transmissions. For the first time, our work studies the interactions between EQS-HBC and biopotential sensing. Our work is important since understanding HBC-RLD interactions is integral to developing EQS-HBC-based biosensors for Body Area Networks (BANs). For the studies, we conducted lab experiments and developed circuit theoretic models to back the experimental outcomes. We show that due to their higher frequency content and common-mode nature, HBC transmissions do not affect the differential sensing of low-frequency biopotential signals. We show that biopotential sensing using RLD affects HBC. RLD deteriorates the signal strength of HBC transmissions. We thus propose not to use RLD with HBC. We demonstrate our proposed solution by transmitting ECG signals using HBC with 96% correlation compared to the traditional wireless system at a fraction of the power.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2020

In-The-Wild Interference Characterization andModelling for Electro-Quasistatic-HBC withMiniaturized Wearables

The emergence of Human Body Communication (HBC) as an alternative to wireless body area networks (WBAN) has led to the development of small sized, energy efficient and more secure wearable and implantable devices forming a network in and around the body. Previous studies claim that though HBC is comparatively more secure than WBAN, nevertheless, the electromagnetic (EM) radiative nature of HBC in >10MHz region makes the information susceptible to eavesdropping. Furthermore, interferences may be picked up by the body due to the human body antenna effect in the 40-400MHz range. Alternatively, electro-quasistatic (EQS) mode of HBC forms an attractive way for covert data transmission in the sub 10MHz region by allowing the signal to be contained within the body. However, there is a gap in the knowledge about the mechanism and sources of interference in this region (crucial in allowing for proper choice of data transmission band). In this paper, the interference coupling modality in the EQS region is explained along with its possible sources. Interferences seen by the wearable in the actual scenario is a non-trivial problem and a suitable measurement EQS HBC setup is designed to recreate it by employing a wearable sized measurement setup having a small ground plane. For the first time, a human biophysical interference pickup model is proposed and interference measurement results using a wearable device are presented up to 250kHz in different environmental settings.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2020

Understanding The Role of Magnetic and Magneto-Quasistatic Fields in Human Body Communication

With the advent of wearable technologies, Human Body Communication (HBC) has emerged as a physically secure and power-efficient alternative to the otherwise ubiquitous Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN). Whereas the most investigated nodes of HBC have been Electric and Electro-quasistatic (EQS) Capacitive and Galvanic, recently Magnetic HBC (M-HBC) has been proposed as a viable alternative. Previous works have investigated M-HBC through an application point of view, without developing a fundamental working principle for the same. In this paper, for the first time, a ground up analysis has been performed to study the possible effects and contributions of the human body channel in M-HBC over a broad frequency range (1kHz to 10 GHz), by detailed electromagnetic simulations and supporting experiments. The results show that while M-HBC can be successfully operated as a body area network, the human body itself plays a minimal or negligible role in its functionality. For frequencies less than[~] 30 Hz, in the domain of operation of Magneto-quasistatic (MQS) HBC, the human body is transparent to the quasistatic magnetic field. Conversely for higher frequencies, the conductive nature of human tissues end up attenuating Magnetic HBC fields due to Eddy currents induced in body tissues, eliminating the possibility of the body to support efficient waveguide modes. With this better understanding at hand, different modes of operations of MQS HBC have been outlined for both high impedance capacitive and 50{Omega} termination cases, and their performances have been compared with EQS HBC for similar sized devices, over varying distance between TX and RX. The resulting report presents the first fundamental understanding towards M-HBC operation and its contrast with EQS HBC, aiding HBC device designers to make educated design decisions, depending on mode of applications.

bioengineering↗