Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Watts, C. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Watts, C. R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Does chlorotoxin target matrix metalloproteinase-2 in glioblastoma?

Glioblastoma aggressively invades surrounding tissue by expressing matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2). Therefore, effective inhibition of MMP-2 is a desirable target for treatment. In some reports, the chlorotoxin (Ctx) polypeptide produced by the scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus, interacts with human MMP-2 to inhibit tumor invasion without affecting surrounding tissue. We employed three molecular docking methodologies followed by molecular dynamics simulations to find consensus binding and calculate the binding energy of these peptide ligands to MMP-2. In addition to the Ctx itself, four C-terminal fragments were chosen to study their binding to MMP-2. The molecular docking platforms HPEPDOCK, HADDOCK, and AlphaFold2 created peptide - protein poses for each candidate binding to MMP-2. These poses underwent 500 ns molecular dynamics simulations. Peptide binding on MMP-2 and final binding energies were calculated using the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area method. Configurational entropy and root-mean square deviation analyses showed stable peptide - protein complexes. Ctx and its peptide fragments frequently bound to regions on MMP-2 other than the catalytic site. All docking methods shared consensus on large negative binding energies, indicating favorable interaction between Ctx and its analogs with MMP-2. While Ctx and its fragments bind to MMP-2, there is no consensus on which region of MMP-2 they are bound to or which peptide binds strongest. Neither Ctx nor its fragments inhibited MMP-2 enzymatic activity, however, glioblastoma cellular migration was inhibited. Interactions with the non-catalytic regions of MMP-2 suggest allosteric binding to MMP-2. Inhibition of cellular migration without inhibition of MMP-2 activity warrants further study into the possible targets of Ctx expressed in glioblastoma.

biophysics↗

Effects of Force Fields on the Conformational and Dynamic Properties of Amyloid β(1-40) Dimer Explored by Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Alzheimers disease is histologically marked by fibrils of Amyloid beta (A{beta}) peptide within the extracellular matrix. Fibrils themselves are benign compared to the cytotoxicity of the oligomers and pre-fibrillary aggregates. The conformational space and structural ensembles of A{beta} peptides and their oligomers in solution are inherently disordered and proven to be challenging to study. Optimum force field selection for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and the biophysical relevance of results are still unknown. We compared the conformational space of the A{beta}(1-40) dimers by 300 ns replica exchange MD simulations at physiological temperature (310 K) using: the AMBER-ff99sb-ILDN, AMBER-ff99sb*-ILDN, AMBER-ff99sb-NMR, and CHARMM22* force fields. Statistical comparisons of simulation results to experimental data and previously published simulations utilizing the CHARMM22* and CHARMM36 force fields were performed. All force fields yield sampled ensembles of conformations with collision cross sectional areas for the dimer that are statistically significantly larger than experimental results. All force fields, with the exception of AMBER-ff99sb-ILDN (8.8{+/-}6.4%) and CHARMM36 (2.7{+/-}4.2%), tend to overestimate the -helical content compared to experimental CD (5.3{+/-}5.2%). Using the AMBER-ff99sb-NMR force field resulted in the greatest degree of variance (41.3{+/-}12.9%). Except for the AMBER-ff99sb-NMR force field, the others tended to under estimate the expected amount of {beta}-sheet and over estimate the amount of turn/bend/random coil conformations. All force fields, with the exception AMBER-ff99sb-NMR, reproduce a theoretically expected {beta}-sheet-turn-{beta}-sheet conformational motif, however, only the CHARMM22* and CHARMM36 force fields yield results compatible with collapse of the central and C-terminal hydrophobic cores from residues 17-21 and 30-36. Although analyses of essential subspace sampling showed only minor variations between force fields, secondary structures of lowest energy conformers are different.

biophysics↗