Biology subjects

Wattiez, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Wattiez, N..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Within-Trial Noise Accounts for Inhibition of Return

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of response times (RTs) for stimuli presented at previously inspected locations relative to novel locations. However, the exact processing stage(s) at which IOR occurs, and its nature across different response modalities, remain debated. By reanalyzing RT data from a target-target IOR paradigm with a single noisy accumulator model, we tested whether IOR could occur at sensory or attentional stages of processing, or at later stages of decision and action selection. We considered IOR under two conditions: manual and saccadic responses. The within-trial Gaussian noise parameter best explained both manual and saccadic IOR, suggesting that in both modalities, IOR may result from a more fluctuating accumulation of evidence for repeated locations. These results support the hypothesis that target-target IOR may primarily involve attentional-level mechanisms. Significance statementWe respond more slowly to a stimulus that is presented within a short interval in the same location ("inhibition of return"), a bias thought to promote efficient visual exploration. Using evidence-accumulation modeling of manual and eye-movement reaction times from two previous studies, we found that the key change linked to inhibition of return is greater within-trial variability (noise) in evidence accumulation, not a higher decision threshold. Understanding which processing stage is affected can help connect behavioral effects to the brain networks that support attention and orienting.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

A breathing-synchronized neuromuscular electrical stimulation algorithm for addressing respiratory impairments after cervical spinal cord injury

Cervical spinal cord injuries (cSCI) induce profound denervation in respiratory muscles leading to hypoventilation that compromises quality of life. Respiratory neuromuscular electrical stimulation of extra-diaphragmatic muscles (rNMES) could be a non-invasive approach to improve respiratory function following cSCI. However, asynchronous NMES with spontaneous respiration can feel unnatural or painful or even lead to potential complication, although synchronized stimulation may be more efficient to improve neuroplasticity after SCI. Here we developed a software-driven synchronized rNMES system aligned with spontaneous breathing, with preliminary validation in a mouse model of cSCI. MethodsAn Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) was solved and fitted to experimental breathing signals obtained via respiratory function recording in mice which underwent cSCI. Optimal stimulation ODE-based parameters were then identified for both intercostal and abdominal muscle stimulation for breathing-synchronized rNMES training. Lastly, acute efficacy was assessed by evaluating the increase in chest position during intercostal stimulation, measured using a piezoelectric sensor on the thorax during stimulation. ResultsThe ODE-based breathing signals matched the experimental ones with an average coefficient of determination (R{superscript 2}) of 81%. The developed algorithm, Algostim, provided average theoretical optimal times of 0.10 {+/-} 0.01 s for intercostal and 0.17 {+/-} 0.02 s for abdominal muscles contraction. Synchronized intercostal stimulation led to twice greater change in chest amplitude compared to non-synchronized stimulation and there was a dose dependent effect with a minimal current intensity of 2 mA and an optimal stimulation reached with 3 mA. This innovative mathematical approach can optimize respiratory muscle stimulation while accounting for spontaneous breathing rate, establishing a framework for personalized rNMES therapies and enabling investigation into its underlying mechanisms.

physiology↗

bioRxiv2022

Behavioral and brain responses to verbal stimuli reveal transient periods of cognitive integration of external world in all sleep stages

Sleep has long been considered as a state of disconnection from the environment, with absent reactivity to external stimuli. Here, we questioned this sleep disconnection dogma by directly investigating behavioral responsiveness in 49 napping subjects (27 with narcolepsy and 22 healthy volunteers) engaged in a lexical decision task. Participants were instructed to frown or smile depending on the stimulus type (words vs pseudo-words). We found accurate behavioral responses, visible via contractions of the corrugator or zygomatic muscles, in all sleep stages in both groups (except slow-wave sleep for healthy volunteers). Stimuli presented during states with high (vs. low) values of neural markers indexing rich cognitive states more often yielded responses. Our findings suggest that transient windows of reactivity to external stimuli exist in all sleep stages, even in healthy individuals. Such windows of reactivity could be used to probe sleep-related mental and cognitive processes in real-time across all sleep stages.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

LATER but FORTIOR: diffusion modelling of inhibition of return

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of response times (RTs) for stimuli repeated at previously inspected locations, as compared with novel ones. However, the exact processing stage(s) at which IOR occurs, and its nature across different response modalities, remain debated. We tested predictions on these issues originating from the FORTIOR model (fronto-parietal organization of response times in IOR; Seidel Malkinson & Bartolomeo, 2018), and from evidence accumulation models. We reanalysed RT data from a target-target IOR paradigm (Bourgeois et al.,2013a, 2013b) by using a LATER-like evidence accumulation model (Carpenter & Williams, 1995), to test the predictions of FORTIOR, and specifically whether IOR could occur at sensory/attentional stages of processing, or at stages of decision and action selection. We considered the following conditions: manual or saccadic response modality, before or after TMS perturbation over four cortical regions. Results showed that the Gaussian noise parameter best explained both manual and saccadic IOR, suggesting that in both response modalities IOR may result from slower accumulation of evidence for repeated locations. Additionally, across stimulated regions, TMS affected only manual RTs, lowering them equally in the conditions with repeated targets (Return) and non-repeated targets (Non-return). Accordingly, the modelling results show that TMS stimulation did not significantly alter the pattern between model parameters, with the Gaussian noise parameter remaining the parameter best explaining the Return - Non-return RT difference. Moreover, TMS over the right intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) perturbed IOR by shortening the Return RT. When directly testing this effect by modelling the TMS impact in the Return condition, the Bayesian information criterion of the Gaussian noise parameter was the smallest, but this effect did not reach significance. These results support the hypothesis that target-target IOR is a predominantly sensory/attentional phenomenon, and may be modulated by activity in fronto-parietal networks.

neuroscience↗