Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Wasmuth, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Wasmuth, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A nematode retrotransposon in the common shrew: horizontal transfer between parasite and host

Reports of horizontal transposon and gene transfers involving metazoan species has increased with the sequencing of their genomes. Horizontal transfer could be facilitated by the intimate relationship between a parasite and its hosts. To date, two studies have identified horizontal transfer of RTEs, a class of retrotransposable elements, involving parasites: ticks might act as vector for BovB between ruminants and squamates, and AviRTE was transferred between birds and parasitic nematodes. We wanted to know if parasitic nematodes are involved in other cases of horizontal transfer of RTEs. We searched 33 mSammalian RTEs in 81 nematode assemblies, and 10 nematode RTEs in 98 mammalian assemblies. We identified RTE1o Sar from Sorex araneus, the common shrew, in parasitic nematodes and show that it originates from nematodes. To exclude contamination of the S. araneus assembly, we developed an approach that uses long reads and paired-end reads. With phylogenetic analysis and copy age estimation, we show that RTE1_Sar was horizontally transferred from nematodes to S. araneus. We confirm horizontal transfer of RTEs in host-parasite interactions, and we present a new method to distinguish between contamination and horizontal transfer.

genomics

One species, two genomes: A critical assessment of inter isolate variation and identification of assembly incongruence in Haemonchus contortus

BackgroundNumerous quality issues may compromise genomic datas representation of its underlying organism. In this study, we compared two genomes published by different research groups for the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus, corresponding to divergent isolates. We analyzed differences between the genomes, attempting to ascertain which were attributable to legitimate biological differences, and which to technical error in one or both genomes.\n\nResultsWe found discrepancies between the H. contortus genomes in both assembly and annotation. The genomes differed in representation of genes that are highly conserved across eukaryotes, with clear evidence of misassembly underlying conserved genes missing from one genome or the other. Only 45% of genes in one genome were orthologous to genes in the other genome, with one genome exhibiting almost as much orthology to C. elegans as its counterpart H. contortus strain. The two genomes differed substantially in probable causes underlying this unexpectedly low orthology. One genome included many more inparalogues than the other, and more frequently assembled inparalogues together on the same portions of contiguous sequence. It also exhibited cases of better-conserved gene position relative to C. elegans.\n\nConclusionThe discrepancies between the two genomes far exceeded those expected as a consequence of biological differences between the two H. contortus isolates. This implies substantial quality issues in one or both genomes, suggesting that researchers must exercise caution when using genomic data for newly sequenced species.

genomics