Wang, L.-W. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2023

A Weakly Supervised U-Net Model for Precise Whole Brain Immunolabeled Cell Detection

Cell segmentations low precision due to the intensity differences hinders widespread use of whole brain microscopy imaging. Previous studies used ResNet or CNN to account for this problem, but are unapplicable to immunolabeled signals across samples. Here we present a semiauto ground truth generation and weakly-supervised U-Net-based Deep-learning precise segmentation pipeline for whole brain immunopositive c-FOS signals, which reveals the distinct neural activity maps with different social motivations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

A versatile method to archive and delipidate brain tissues for ensuing multiplexed immunolabeling and organ-level imaging

Tissue clearing and labeling techniques have revolutionized brain-wide imaging and analysis, yet their application to clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks remains challenging. We introduce HIF-Clear, a novel method for efficiently clearing and labeling centimeter-thick FFPE specimens using elevated temperature and concentrated detergents. HIF-Clear with multi-round immunolabeling reveals neuron circuitry regulating multiple neurotransmitter systems in a whole FFPE mouse brain, and is able to be used as the evaluation of disease treatment efficiency. HIF-Clear also supports expansion microscopy and can be performed on a non-sectioned 15-year-old FFPE specimen, as well as a 3-month formalin-fixed mouse brain. Thus, HIF-Clear represents a feasible approach for researching archived FFPE specimens for future neuroscientific and 3D neuropathological analyses.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2022

Knowledge Mapping of Alternative Splicing of Cancer From 2012 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis

BackgroundAs a processing method of RNA precursors, alternative splicing plays a critical role in normal cell physiological activities. Aberrant alternative splicing events are associated with cancer development and are promising targets for cancer treatment. However, no detailed and unbiased study describes the current state of alternative splicing of cancer research. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of alternative splicing of cancer research in the last decade to measure and recognize the current state and trends. MethodsWeb of Science Core Collection was used to acquire the articles. Utilizing three bibliometric tools (CiteSpace, VOSviewer, R-bibliometrix), we were able to measure and recognize the influence and collaboration data of individual articles, journals, and co-citations. Analysis of co-occurrence and bursts information helped us identify the trending research areas related to alternative splicing of cancer. ResultsFrom 2012 to 2021, the total number of papers on alternative splicing of cancer published in 766 academic journals was 3,507, authored by 20,406 researchers in 405 institutions from 80 countries/regions. Research involving alternative splicing of cancer genes was primarily conducted in the United States and China, with the United States retaining the prime status; simultaneously, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fudan University and National Cancer Institute were the institutions with strong research capabilities. Scorilas Andreas is the scholar with the most publications, while the most co-citations were generated by Wang, Eric T. Plos One published the most papers on alternative splicing of cancer, while J biol chem was the most co-cited academic journal in this field. Furthermore, these publications covered a wide range of areas, but were still primarily focused on the fields of molecular, biology, and immunology. The results of keyword co-occurrence analysis can be divided into three types: molecular (P53, CD44, Androgen receptor, SRSF3, ESRP1), pathological process (apoptosis, EMT, metastasis, angiogenesis, proliferation), and disease (breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer). ConclusionResearch on alternative splicing of cancer has been a hot topic over the past decade, increasing in intensity each year. Current alternative splicing of cancer studies focused on hallmarks of alternative splicing in cancer, and alternative splicing signatures including diagnostic and therapeutic targets. Among them, the current trends are splicing factors regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and other hallmarks, aberrant splicing events in tumors, and further mechanisms. These might give researchers interested in this field a forward-looking perspective and inform further research.

cancer biology↗