Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Wander, S. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Wander, S. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Weak supervision of H&E slides reveals systems-level biology and functional states that govern therapeutic resistance

Precision oncology lacks scalable methods to identify the mechanisms that mediate therapeutic resistance for individual patients. Resistance often arises from focal cellular niches that are obscured by bulk profiling and costly to resolve with multi-omics. Here, we show that deep learning (DL), applied to routine histology, can localize focal tissue regions enriched for therapeutically relevant biology. Using 3111 breast cancer H&E slides with matched bulk transcriptomics, we trained weakly-supervised DL models to infer activities of immune, metabolic, and tumor-intrinsic phenotypes implicated in therapeutic resistance (AUROC>0.80; PCC>0.64). Accurate inference of these phenotypes should identify tissue regions enriched for the corresponding biological signal. Therefore, we validated phenotype inference and spatial localization with complementary analyses. Tissue-matched multiplexed immunofluorescence showed concordance between inferred immune states and corresponding cell fractions (p=0.006-0.106). Across multi-institutional cohorts, model-derived phenotypes recovered expected relationships with therapeutic outcomes (p<0.045). Finally, in a blinded evaluation, pathologists confirmed that model-derived high-attention regions were enriched for phenotype-specific morphology (p<2.408*10-5). Because evaluated phenotypes represent diverse mechanisms of resistance across therapeutic modalities, these findings provide a foundation for resistance-directed localization using therapeutic outcomes as supervision. By directing deep profiling toward model-prioritized regions, this framework could enable scalable nomination of candidate mediators of resistance for subsequent functional validation across real-world patient populations. One sentence summaryWeakly supervised deep learning localizes focal tissue regions enriched for therapeutically relevant biology in routine histology, thus offering a scalable strategy to study therapeutic resistance across large patient populations.

biophysics↗

The genomic landscape of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer

Clinical resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ breast cancer have not been clearly defined. Whole exome sequencing of 59 tumors with CDK4/6i exposure revealed multiple candidate resistance mechanisms including RB1 loss, activating alterations in AKT1, RAS, AURKA, CCNE2, ERBB2, and FGFR2, and loss of ER expression. In vitro experiments confirmed that these alterations conferred CDK4/6i resistance. Cancer cells cultured to resistance with CDK4/6i also acquired RB1, KRAS, AURKA, or CCNE2 alterations, which conferred sensitivity to AURKA, ERK, or CHEK1 inhibition. Besides inactivation of RB1, which accounts for [~]5% of resistance, seven of these mechanisms have not been previously identified as clinical mediators of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients. Three of these--RAS activation, AKT activation, and AURKA activation--have not to our knowledge been previously demonstrated preclinically. Together, these eight mechanisms were present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled and may define therapeutic opportunities in patients. SignificanceWe identified eight distinct mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled. Most of these have a therapeutic strategy to overcome or prevent resistance in these tumors. Taken together, these findings have critical implications related to the potential utility of precision-based approaches to overcome resistance in many patients with HR+ MBC.

cancer biology↗

Acquired FGFR and FGF alterations confer resistance to estrogen receptor (ER) targeted therapy in ER+ metastatic breast cancer

Beyond acquired mutations in the estrogen receptor (ER), mechanisms of resistance to ER-directed therapies in ER+ breast cancer have not been clearly defined. We conducted a genome-scale functional screen spanning 10,135 genes to investigate genes whose overexpression confer resistance to selective estrogen receptor degraders. Pathway analysis of candidate resistance genes demonstrated that the FGFR, ERBB, insulin receptor, and MAPK pathways represented key modalities of resistance. In parallel, we performed whole exome sequencing in paired pre-treatment and post-resistance biopsies from 60 patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer who had developed resistance to ER-targeted therapy. The FGFR pathway was altered via FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGF3 amplifications or FGFR2 mutations in 24 (40%) of the post-resistance biopsies. In 12 of the 24 post-resistance tumors exhibiting FGFR/FGF alterations, these alterations were not detected in the corresponding pre-treatment tumors, suggesting that they were acquired or enriched under the selective pressure of ER-directed therapy. In vitro experiments in ER+ breast cancer cells confirmed that FGFR/FGF alterations led to fulvestrant resistance as well as cross-resistance to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. RNA sequencing of resistant cell lines treated with different drug combinations demonstrated that FGFR/FGF induced resistance through ER reprogramming and activation of the MAPK pathway. The resistance phenotypes were reversed by FGFR inhibitors, a MEK inhibitor, and/or a SHP2 inhibitor, suggesting potential treatment strategies. The detection of targetable, clonally acquired genetic alterations in the FGFR pathway in metastatic tumor biopsies highlights the value of serial tumor testing to dissect mechanisms of resistance in human breast cancer and its potential application in directing clinical management.

cancer biology↗