Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Walker, H. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Walker, H. C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Method for Electrical Stimulus Artifact Removal Exploiting Neural Refractoriness: Validation by Contrasting Cathodic and Anodic Stimulation

ObjectiveTo present a novel method for removing stimulus transient that exploits the absolute refractory period of electrically excitable neural tissues. BackgroundElectrical stimulation often generates significant signal artifacts that can obscure important physiological signals. Removal of the artifact and understanding latent information from these signals could provide objective measures of circuit engagement, potentially driving advancements in neuromodulation research and therapies. MethodsWe conducted intracranial physiology studies on five consecutive patients with Parkinsons disease who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery as part of their routine care. Monopolar stimuli (either cathodic or anodic) were delivered in pairs through the DBS electrode across a range of inter-stimulus intervals. Recordings from adjacent unused electrode contacts used broadband sampling and precise synchronization to generate a robust template for the stimulus transient during the absolute refractory period. These templates of stimulus transient were then subtracted from recordings at different intervals to extract and analyze the residual neural potentials. ResultsAfter artifact removal, the residual signals exhibited absolute and relative refractory periods with timing indicative of neural activity. Cathodic and anodic DBS pulses generated distinct patterns of local tissue activation, showing phase independence from the prior stimulus. The earliest detectable neural responses occurred at short peak latencies (ranging from 0.19 to 0.38 ms post-stimulus) and were completely or partially obscured by the stimulus artifact prior to removal. Cathodic stimuli produced stronger local tissue responses than anodic stimuli, aligning with clinical observations of lower activation thresholds for cathodic stimulation. However, cathodic and anodic pulses induced artifact patterns that were equivalent but opposite. InterpretationThe proposed artifact removal technique enhances prior approaches by allowing direct measurement of local tissue responses without requirements for stimulus polarity reversal, template scaling, or specialized filters. This approach could be integrated into future neuromodulation systems to visualize stimulus-evoked neural potentials that would otherwise be obscured by stimulus artifacts.

bioengineering↗

Differential Contribution of Sensorimotor Cortex and Subthalamic Nucleus to Unimanual and Bimanual Hand Movements

Why does unilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation improve motor function bilaterally? To address this clinical observation, we collected parallel neural recordings from sensorimotor cortex and the subthalamic nucleus during repetitive ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral hand movements in patients with Parkinsons disease undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. We used a cross-validated electrode-wise encoding model to map EMG data to the neural signals. Electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus encoded movement in a comparable manner for both hands during unimanual and bimanual movements, whereas sensorimotor cortex electrodes displayed a strong contralateral bias. To examine representational overlap in encoding across the two hands, we trained the model with data from one condition (contralateral hand) and used the trained weights to predict neural activity for movements produced with the other hand (ipsilateral hand). Overall, between-hand generalization was poor and this limitation was evident in both SMC and STN. A similar method was used to probe representational overlap across different task contexts (unimanual vs. bimanual). Task context was more important for the STN compared to the SMC indicating that neural activity in the STN showed greater divergence between the unimanual and bimanual conditions. These results indicate that whereas SMC activity is strongly lateralized and relatively context-free, STN integrates contextual information with the ongoing behavior. Significance StatementUnilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves both contralateral and ipsilateral motor symptoms of Parkinsons disease. To explore mechanisms for bilateral improvement, parallel neural recordings from the sensorimotor cortex (SMC) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) were recorded in patients with Parkinsons disease undergoing DBS. Neural activity and muscle activity from the hands were collected while patients performed unimanual and bimanual repetitive hand movements. Activity in SMC primarily encoded contralateral movements and was relatively context-free. In contrast, STN encoded movements in a comparable manner for both hands and was sensitive to the behavioral context.

neuroscience↗