Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Voorhies, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Voorhies, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A robust and adaptive framework for interaction testing in quantitative traits between multiple genetic loci and exposure variables

The identification and understanding of gene-environment interactions can provide insights into the pathways and mechanisms underlying complex diseases. However, testing for gene-environment interaction remains a challenge since statistical power is often limited, the specification of environmental effects is nontrivial, and such misspecifications can lead to false positive findings. To address the lack of statistical power, recent methods aim to identify interactions on an aggregated level using, for example, polygenic risk scores. While this strategy increases power to detect interactions, identifying contributing key genes and pathways is difficult based on these global results. Here, we propose RITSS (Robust Interaction Testing using Sample Splitting), a gene-environment interaction testing framework for quantitative traits that is based on sample splitting and robust test statistics. RITSS can incorporate multiple genetic variants and/or multiple environmental factors. Using sample splitting, a screening step enables the selection and combination of potential interactions into scores with improved interpretability, based on the users unrestricted choices for statistical/machine learning approaches. In the testing step, the application of robust test statistics minimizes the susceptibility of the results to main effect misspecifications. Using extensive simulation studies, we demonstrate that RITSS controls the type 1 error rate in a wide range of scenarios. In an application to lung function phenotypes and human height in the UK Biobank, RITSS identified genome-wide significant interactions with subcomponents of genetic risk scores. While the contributing single variant interactions are moderate, our analysis results indicate interesting interaction patterns that result in strong aggregated signals that provide further insights into gene-environment interaction mechanisms.

bioinformatics↗

The influence of unmeasured confounding on the MR Steiger approach

The Mendelian Randomization (MR) Steiger approach is used to determine the direction of a possible causal effect between two phenotypes [1]. For two phenotypes, denoted phenotype 1 and 2, the MR Steiger approach is composed of two parts: (1) MR is performed for a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that serve as instrumental variables for phenotype 1 and (2) the difference of two correlations, the correlation between the SNPs and phenotype 1 and the correlation between the SNPs and phenotype 2, is calculated. These two parts are then used to determine the direction of a possible causal effect between the two phenotypes. The original MR Steiger paper [1] shows that unmeasured confounding of the two phenotypes affects the validity of the MR Steiger approach, but does not elucidate as to how this occurs. In particular, it was argued that if the magnitude of the observational variance explained between the two phenotypes is above 0.2, the MR Steiger method may return the incorrect causal direction due to unmeasured confounding. This may initially seem surprising since unmeasured confounding does not induce spurious associations between the SNP and phenotype 2, as we demonstrate using directed acyclic graphs. In this note, we show that this is because unmeasured confounding may rescale the magnitude of a non-zero association, and thereby distort the comparison of the correlation between the SNP and phenotype 2 and the correlation between the SNP and phenotype 1. We will end with a number of cautionary remarks on the MR Steiger method, which are partly motivated by this and mentioned in the original MR Steiger paper [1].

genetics↗