Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Volpi, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Volpi, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Connecting the Dots: Approaching a Standardized Nomenclature for Molecular Connectivity Combining Data and Literature

PET-based connectivity computation is a molecular approach that complements fMRI-derived functional connectivity. However, the diversity of methodologies and terms employed in PET connectivity analysis has resulted in ambiguities and confounded interpretations, highlighting the need for a standardized nomenclature. Drawing parallels from other imaging modalities, we propose "molecular connectivity" as an umbrella term to characterize statistical dependencies between PET signals across brain regions at the individual level (within-subject). Like fMRI resting-state functional connectivity, "molecular connectivity" leverages temporal associations in the PET signal to derive brain network associations. Another within-subject approach evaluates regional similarities of tracer kinetics, which are unique in PET imaging, thus referred to as "kinetic connectivity". On the other hand, "molecular covariance" denotes group-level computations of covariance matrices across-subject. Further specification of the terminology can be achieved by including the employed radioligand, such as "metabolic connectivity/covariance" for [18F]FDG as well as "tau/amyloid covariance" for [18F]flutemetamol / [18F]flortaucipir. To augment these distinctions, high-temporal resolution functional [18F]FDG PET scans from 17 healthy participants were analysed with common techniques of molecular connectivity and covariance, allowing for a data-driven support of the above terminology. Our findings demonstrate that temporal band-pass filtering yields structured network organization, whereas other techniques like 3rd order polynomial fitting, spatio-temporal filtering and baseline normalization require further methodological refinement for high-temporal resolution data. Conversely, molecular covariance from across-subject data provided a simple means to estimate brain region interactions through regularized or sparse inverse covariance estimation. A standardized nomenclature in PET-based connectivity research can reduce ambiguity, enhance reproducibility, and facilitate interpretability across radiotracers and imaging modalities. Via a data-driven approach, this work provides a transparent framework for categorizing and comparing PET-derived connectivity and covariance metrics, laying the foundation for future investigations in the field.

neuroscience↗

A new framework for metabolic connectivity mapping using bolus FDG PET and kinetic modelling

PurposeMetabolic connectivity (MC) has been previously proposed as the covariation of static [18F]FDG PET images across participants, which we call across-individual MC (ai-MC). In few cases, MC has also been inferred from dynamic [18F]FDG signals, similarly to fMRI functional connectivity (FC), which we term within-individual MC (wi-MC). The validity and interpretability of both MC approaches is an important open issue. Here we reassess this topic, aiming to 1) develop a novel methodology for wi-MC estimation; 2) compare ai-MC maps obtained using different [18F]FDG parameters (K1, i.e. tracer transport rate, k3, i.e. phosphorylation rate, Ki, i.e. tracer uptake rate, and the standardized uptake value ratio, SUVR); 3) assess the interpretability of ai-MC and wi-MC in comparison to structural and functional connectivity (FC) measures. MethodsWe analyzed dynamic [18F]FDG data from 54 healthy adults using kinetic modelling to quantify the macro- and microparameters describing the tracer behavior (i.e. Ki, K1, k3). We also calculated SUVR. From the across-individual correlation of SUVR, Ki, K1, k3, we obtained four different ai-MC matrices. A new approach based on Euclidean distance was developed to calculate wi-MC from PET time-activity curves. ResultsWe identified Euclidean similarity as the most appropriate metric to calculate wi-MC. ai-MC networks changed with different [18F]FDG parameters (k3 MC vs. SUVR MC, r = 0.44). We found that wi-MC and ai-MC matrices are dissimilar (maximum r = 0.37), and that the match with FC is higher for wi-MC (Dice similarity: 0.47-0.63) than for ai-MC (0.24-0.39). ConclusionOur data demonstrate that individual-level MC from dynamic [18F]FDG data using Euclidean similarity is feasible and yields interpretable matrices that bear similarity to resting-state fMRI FC measures.

bioengineering↗