Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Vokes, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Vokes, N..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

YAP1 status defines two intrinsic subtypes of LCNEC with distinct molecular features and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy that, like the more common small cell lung cancer (SCLC), is associated with an absence of druggable oncogenic driver mutations, a clinically aggressive disease course, and dismal prognosis. In contrast to SCLC, however, there is little evidence to guide optimal treatment strategies which are, instead, often adapted from SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) approaches. While there have been some efforts to describe the molecular landscape of LCNEC, to date there are few links between distinct biologic phenotypes of LCNEC and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Here, we demonstrate that the presence or absence of the transcription factor YAP1 distinguishes two roughly equal subsets of LCNEC. The YAP1-high subset is mesenchymal and inflamed and characterized, alongside TP53 mutations, by co-occurring alterations in CDKN2A/B and SMARCA4. Therapeutically, the YAP1-high subset demonstrates vulnerability to MEK and AXL targeting strategies, including a novel preclinical AXL CAR-T cell, as well as predicted vulnerability to SMARCA2 degraders and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Meanwhile, the YAP1-low subset is epithelial and immune-cold and more commonly features TP53 and RB1 co-mutations, similar to those observed in pure SCLC. Notably, the YAP1-low subset is also characterized by expression of SCLC subtype-defining transcription factors -especially ASCL1 and NEUROD1 - and, as expected given its transcriptional similarities to SCLC, exhibits putative vulnerabilities reminiscent of SCLC, including Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and CD56 targeting, as with novel preclinical DLL3 and CD56 CAR T-cells, and DNA damage repair (DDR) inhibition. These findings highlight the potential for YAP1 to guide the first personalized treatment strategies for LCNEC.

cancer biology↗

Clinical interpretation of integrative molecular profiles to guide precision cancer medicine

Individual tumor molecular profiling is routinely used to detect single gene-variant ("first-order") genomic alterations that may inform therapeutic actions -- for instance, a tumor with a BRAF p.V600E variant might be considered for RAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Interactions between such first-order events (e.g., somatic-germline) and global molecular features (e.g. mutational signatures) are increasingly associated with clinical outcomes, but these "second order" alterations are not yet generally accounted for in clinical interpretation algorithms and knowledge bases. Here, we introduce the Molecular Oncology Almanac (MOAlmanac), a clinical interpretation algorithm paired with a novel underlying knowledge base to enable integrative interpretation of genomic and transcriptional cancer data for point-of-care treatment decision-making and translational hypothesis generation. We compared MOAlmanac to first-order interpretation methodology in multiple retrospective patient cohorts and observed that the inclusion of preclinical and inferential evidence as well as second-order molecular features increased the number of nominated clinical hypotheses. MOAlmanac also performed matchmaking between patient molecular profiles and cancer cell lines to further expand individualized clinical actionability. When applied to a prospective precision oncology trial cohort, MOAlmanac nominated a median of two therapies per patient and identified therapeutic strategies administered in 46% of patient profiles. Overall, we present a novel computational method to perform integrative clinical interpretation of individualized molecular profiles. MOAlmanc increases clinical actionability over conventional approaches by considering second-order molecular features and additional evidence sources, and is available as an open-source framework.

cancer biology↗

Integrative Molecular Characterization of Sarcomatoid and Rhabdoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Reveals Determinants of Poor Prognosis and Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid (S/R) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are highly aggressive tumors with limited molecular and clinical characterization. Emerging evidence suggests immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are particularly effective for these tumors1-3, although the biological basis for this property is largely unknown. Here, we evaluate multiple clinical trial and real-world cohorts of S/R RCC to characterize their molecular features, clinical outcomes, and immunologic characteristics. We find that S/R RCC tumors harbor distinctive molecular features that may account for their aggressive behavior, including BAP1 mutations, CDKN2A deletions, and increased expression of MYC transcriptional programs. We show that these tumors are highly responsive to ICI and that they exhibit an immune-inflamed phenotype characterized by immune activation, increased cytotoxic immune infiltration, upregulation of antigen presentation machinery genes, and PD-L1 expression. Our findings shed light on the molecular drivers of aggressivity and responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors of S/R RCC tumors.

cancer biology↗