Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Villafanez, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Villafanez, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Rad51 determines pathway usage in post-replication repair

Stalled replication forks can be processed by several distinct mechanisms collectively called post-replication repair which includes homologous recombination, fork regression, and translesion DNA synthesis. However, the regulation of the usage between these pathways is not fully understood. The Rad51 protein plays a pivotal role in maintaining genomic stability through its roles in HR and in protecting stalled replication forks from degradation. We report the isolation of separation-of-function mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 that retain their recombination function but display a defect in fork protection leading to a shift in post-replication repair pathway usage from HR to alternate pathways including mutagenic translesion synthesis. Rad51-E135D and Rad51-K305N show normal in vivo and in vitro recombination despite changes in their DNA binding profiles, in particular to dsDNA, with a resulting effect on their ATPase activities. The mutants lead to a defect in Rad51 recruitment to stalled forks in vivo as well as a defect in the protection of dsDNA from degradation by Dna2-Sgs1 and Exo1 in vitro. A high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Rad51-ssDNA filament at 2.4 [A] resolution provides a structural basis for a mechanistic understanding of the mutant phenotypes. Together, the evidence suggests a model in which Rad51 binding to duplex DNA is critical to control pathway usage at stalled replication forks.

molecular biology↗

Eukaryotic stress induced mutagenesis is limited by a local control of Translesion Synthesis

The DNA Damage Response (DDR) preserves the genetic integrity of the cell by sensing and repairing damages after a genotoxic stress. Translesion Synthesis (TLS), an error-prone DNA damage tolerance pathway, is controlled by PCNA ubiquitination. In this report, we raise the question whether TLS is controlled locally, or globally. Using a recently developed method that allows to follow the bypass of a single lesion inserted into the yeast genome, we show that: i) TLS is controlled locally at each individual lesion by PCNA ubiquitination, ii) a single lesion is enough to induce PCNA ubiquitination, and iii) PCNA ubiquitination is an imperative requirement for TLS to occur. More importantly, we show that global PCNA ubiquitination that follows a genotoxic stress does not increase TLS at individual lesions. We conclude that unlike the SOS response in bacteria, the eukaryotic DDR does not promote TLS and mutagenesis.

molecular biology↗