Biology subjects

Vieira, P. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Vieira, P. G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Brain stimulation preferentially influences long-range projections in primates

Advances in brain stimulation have made it possible to target smaller and smaller regions for electromagnetic stimulation, in the hopes of producing increasingly focal neural effects. However, the brain is extensively interconnected, and the neurons comprising those connections may themselves be particularly susceptible to neurostimulation. Here, we test this hypothesis by identifying long-range projections in single-unit recordings from non-human primates receiving transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). We find that putative long-range projections are more strongly affected by stimulation than other cells. Specifically, they are both more entrained on average and account for occurrences of extremely strong entrainment. Since stimulation appears to target the edges, rather than nodes, of neural networks, it may be necessary to rethink how neurostimulation strategies are designed.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Temporal interference stimulation disrupts spike timing in the primate brain

Electrical stimulation can regulate brain activity, producing clear clinical benefits, but focal and effective neuromodulation often requires surgically implanted electrodes. Recent studies argue that temporal interference (TI) stimulation may provide similar outcomes non-invasively. During TI, scalp electrodes generate multiple electrical fields in the brain, modulating neural activity only where they overlap. Despite considerable enthusiasm for this approach, little empirical evidence demonstrates its effectiveness, especially under conditions suitable for human use. Here, using single-neuron recordings in non-human primates, we show that TI reliably alters the timing of spiking activity. However, we find that the strategies which improve the focality of TI -- high frequencies, multiple electrodes, and amplitude-modulated waveforms -- also limit its effectiveness. Combined, they make TI 80% weaker than other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. Although this is too weak to cause widespread neuronal entrainment, it may be ideally suited for disrupting pathological synchronization, a hallmark of many neurological disorders.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

tACS competes with ongoing oscillations for control of spike-timing in the primate brain.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is commonly used to enhance brain rhythms, in the hopes of improving behavioral performance. Unfortunately, these interventions often yield highly variable results. Here, we identify a key source of this variability by recording from single neurons in alert non-human primates. We find that, rather than enhancing rhythmic activity, tACS appears to compete with the brains endogenous oscillations for control of spike timing. Specifically, when the strength of stimulation is weak relative to endogenous oscillations, tACS actually decreases the rhythmicity of spiking. However, when stimulation is comparatively stronger, tACS imposes its own rhythm on spiking activity. Thus the effect of tACS depends categorically on the strength of neural entrainment to endogenous oscillations, which varies greatly across behavioral states and brain regions. Without carefully considering these factors, attempts to impose external rhythms on specific brain regions may often yield precisely the opposite of the intended effect.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

tACS entrains neural activity while somatosensory input is blocked

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates brain activity by passing electrical current through electrodes that are attached to the scalp. Because it is safe and non-invasive, it holds great promise as a tool for basic research and clinical treatment. However, little is known about how tACS ultimately influences neural activity. One hypothesis is that tACS affects neural responses directly, by producing electrical fields that interact with the brains endogenous electrical activity. Since the shape and location of these electric fields can be controlled, stimulation could be targeted at brain regions associated with particular behaviors or symptoms. However, an alternative hypothesis is that tACS affects neural activity indirectly, via peripheral sensory afferents. In particular, it has often been hypothesized that tACS acts on nerve fibers in the skin, which in turn provide rhythmic input to central neurons. In this case, there would be little possibility of targeted brain stimulation, as the regions modulated by tACS would depend entirely on the somatosensory pathways originating in the skin around the stimulating electrodes. Here, we directly test these competing hypotheses by recording single-unit activity in the hippocampus and visual cortex of monkeys receiving tACS. We find that tACS entrains neuronal activity in both regions, so that cells fire synchronously with the stimulation. Blocking somatosensory input with a topical anesthetic does not significantly alter these neural entrainment effects. These data are therefore consistent with the direct stimulation hypothesis and suggest that peripheral somatosensory stimulation is not required for tACS to entrain neurons.

neuroscience↗