Biology subjects

Veltman, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Veltman, D..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Image-Based Meta- and Mega-Analysis (IBMMA): A Unified Framework for Large-Scale, Multi-Site, Neuroimaging Data Analysis

The increasing scale and complexity of neuroimaging datasets aggregated from multiple study sites present substantial analytic challenges, as existing statistical analysis tools struggle to handle missing voxel-data, suffer from limited computational speed and inefficient memory allocation, and are restricted in the types of statistical designs they are able to model. We introduce Image-Based Meta- & Mega-Analysis (IBMMA), a novel software package implemented in R and Python that provides a unified framework for analyzing diverse neuroimaging features, efficiently handles large-scale datasets through parallel processing, offers flexible statistical modeling options, and properly manages missing voxel-data commonly encountered in multi-site studies. IBMMA produced stronger effect sizes and revealed findings in brain regions that traditional software overlooked due to missing voxel-data resulting in gaps in brain coverage. IBMMA has the potential to accelerate discoveries in neuroscience and enhance the clinical utility of neuroimaging findings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive-compulsive disorder differ according to medication status.

IntroAlthough it has been suggested that the hippocampus and amygdala (HA) are involved in the neurobiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), volumetric findings have been inconsistent. Furthermore, the HA consist of heterogenous anatomic units with specific functions and cytoarchitecture, and little work has been undertaken on the volumetry of these subfields in OCD. MethodsT1-weighted images from 381 patients with OCD and 338 healthy controls (HCs) from the OCD Brain Imaging Consortium were segmented to produce twelve hippocampal subfields and nine amygdala subfields using FreeSurfer 6.0. We assessed between-group differences in subfield volume using a mixed-effects model adjusted for age, quadratic effects of age, sex, site, and whole HA volume. Given evidence of confounding effects of clinical characteristics on brain volumes in OCD, we also performed subgroup analyses to examine subfield volume in relation to comorbid anxiety and depression, medication status, and symptom severity. ResultsPatients with OCD and HCs did not significantly differ in HA subfield volume. However, medicated patients with OCD had significantly smaller hippocampal dentate gyrus (pFDR=0.042, d=-0.26) and molecular layer (pFDR=0.042, d=-0.29) and larger lateral (pFDR=0.049, d=0.23) and basal (pFDR=0.049, d=0.25) amygdala subfields than HCs. Unmedicated patients had significantly smaller hippocampal CA1 (pFDR=0.016, d=-0.28) than HCs. No association was detected between any subfield volume and OCD severity. ConclusionDifferences in HA subfields between OCD and HCs are dependent on medication status, in line with previous work on other brain volumetric alterations in OCD. This emphasizes the importance of considering psychotropic medication in neuroimaging studies of OCD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

A Large-Scale ENIGMA Multisite Replication Study of Brain Age in Depression

BackgroundSeveral studies have evaluated whether depressed persons have older appearing brains than their nondepressed peers. However, the estimated neuroimaging-derived "brain age gap" has varied from study to study, likely driven by differences in training and testing sample (size), age range, and used modality/features. To validate our previously developed ENIGMA brain age model and the identified brain age gap, we aim to replicate the presence and effect size estimate previously found in the largest study in depression to date (N=2,126 controls & N=2,675 cases; +1.08 years [SE 0.22], Cohens d=0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.20), in independent cohorts that were not part of the original study. MethodsA previously trained brain age model (www.photon-ai.com/enigma_brainage) based on 77 FreeSurfer brain regions of interest was used to obtain unbiased brain age predictions in 751 controls and 766 persons with depression (18-75 years) from 13 new cohorts collected from 20 different scanners. ResultsOur ENIGMA MDD brain age model generalized reasonably well to controls from the new cohorts (predicted age vs. age: r = 0.73, R2=0.47, MAE=7.50 years), although the performance varied from cohort to cohort. In these new cohorts, on average, depressed persons showed a significantly higher brain age gap of +1 year (SE 0.35) (Cohens d{square}={square}{square}.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.25) compared with controls, highly similar to our previous finding. ConclusionsThis study further validates our previously developed ENIGMA brain age algorithm. Importantly, we replicated the brain age gap in depression with a comparable effect size. Thus, two large-scale independent mega-analyses across in total 32 cohorts and >3,400 patients and >2,800 controls worldwide show reliable but subtle effects of brain aging in adult depression.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: attempted replication of Drysdale et.al. 2017

BackgroundPsychiatric disorders are highly heterogeneous, defined based on symptoms with little connection to potential underlying biological mechanisms. A possible approach to dissect biological heterogeneity is to look for biologically meaningful subtypes. A recent study Drysdale et al. (2017) showed promising results along this line by simultaneously using resting state fMRI and clinical data and identified four distinct subtypes of depression with different clinical profiles and abnormal resting state fMRI connectivity. These subtypes were predictive of treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy.\n\nObjectiveHere, we attempted to replicate the procedure followed in the Drysdale et al. study and their findings in an independent dataset of a clinically more heterogeneous sample of 187 participants with depression and anxiety. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) Using the same procedure, can we find a statistically significant and reliable relationship between brain connectivity and clinical symptoms? 2) Is the observed relationship similar to the one found in the original study? 3) Can we identify distinct and reliable subtypes? 4) Do they have similar clinical profiles as the subtypes identified in the original study?\n\nMethodsWe followed the original procedure as closely as possible, including a canonical correlation analysis to find a low dimensional representation of clinically relevant resting state fMRI features, followed by hierarchical clustering to identify subtypes. We extended the original procedure using additional statistical tests, to test the statistical significance of the relationship between resting state fMRI and clinical data, and the existence of distinct subtypes. Furthermore, we examined the stability of the whole procedure using resampling.\n\nResults and ConclusionWe were not able to replicate the findings of the original study. Relationships between brain connectivity and clinical symptoms were not statistically significant and we also did not find clearly distinct subtypes of depression. We argue, that based on our rigorous approach and in-depth review of the original results, that the evidence for the existence of the distinct resting state connectivity based subtypes of depression is weak and should be interpreted with caution.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Deep Learning for Quality Control of Subcortical Brain 3D Shape Models

We present several deep learning models for assessing the morphometric fidelity of deep grey matter region models extracted from brain MRI. We test three different convolutional neural net architectures (VGGNet, ResNet and Inception) over 2D maps of geometric features. Further, we present a novel geometry feature augmentation technique based on parametric spherical mapping. Finally, we present an approach for model decision visualization, allowing human raters to see the areas of subcortical shapes most likely to be deemed of failing quality by the machine. Our training data is comprised of 5200 subjects from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia MRI cohorts, and our test dataset contains 1500 subjects from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder cohorts. Our final models reduce human rater time by 46-70%. ResNet outperforms VGGNet and Inception for all of our predictive tasks.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Machine Learning for Large-Scale Quality Control of 3D Shape Models in Neuroimaging

As very large studies of complex neuroimaging phenotypes become more common, human quality assessment of MRI-derived data remains one of the last major bottlenecks. Few attempts have so far been made to address this issue with machine learning. In this work, we optimize predictive models of quality for meshes representing deep brain structure shapes. We use standard vertex-wise and global shape features computed homologously across 19 cohorts and over 7500 human-rated subjects, training kernelized Support Vector Machine and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees classifiers to detect meshes of failing quality. Our models generalize across datasets and diseases, reducing human workload by 30-70%, or equivalently hundreds of human rater hours for datasets of comparable size, with recall rates approaching inter-rater reliability.

neuroscience↗