Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Velosa, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Velosa, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

NMDA receptor ablation in medial prefrontal cortex disrupts value updating and reward history integration

Schizophrenia, a serious mental illness, is associated with evidence of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction and characterized by cognitive impairments that reflect impaired value updating and feedback-driven control; however the cellular and circuit-level mechanisms underlying these disruptions remain unclear. Here we test how NMDA receptor (NMDAR) signaling in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) contributes to adaptive decision-making by combining targeted genetic ablation in mice and systemic pharmacology. Using a CRISPR-Cas9 approach to eliminate the obligate GluN1 subunit, we induced spatially confined NMDAR hypofunction in mPFC and compared its effects to systemic pharmacological blockade with the NMDAR antagonist MK-801 during performance of a touchscreen-based restless bandit task. Prefrontal NMDAR ablation impaired value discrimination, weakened the use of negative feedback, and reduced mutual information between recent outcomes and current choices, indicating disrupted reward-history integration. Reinforcement-learning models incorporating a choice-kernel term best captured behavior and revealed that NMDAR ablation selectively dampened learning and choice-history parameters governing flexible updating. Systemic MK-801 produced broad impairments in control animals, reducing accuracy, mutual information, and outcome sensitivity, yet exerted only modest additional effects after NMDAR ablation, suggesting that prefrontal NMDAR loss occluded much of the pharmacological disruption. Simulations using fitted RLCK parameters reproduced these patterns, showing convergent flattening of choice dynamics under MK-801 and persistent deficits in GluN1 ablated animals. Together, these findings demonstrate that prefrontal NMDAR signaling is necessary for effective value updating and feedback-driven learning, and that its loss recapitulates core features of systemic NMDAR hypofunction. This work establishes a mechanistic bridge between localized cortical glutamatergic dysfunction and the reinforcement-learning disturbances characteristic of schizophrenia.

neuroscience↗

16p11.2 duplication shows early male-biased impacts on reward learning, but NMDA receptor antagonism reduces optimal choice selection in both wildtypes and 16p11.2 duplication

Rationale16p11.2 duplication is associated with numerous neuropsychiatric conditions at a genome-wide level, including psychosis. Mice modeling 16p11.2 duplication may provide important insights into cognitive risk factors, in particular in reward-guided decision making. NMDAR function has also been implicated in psychosis phenotypes, but whether these phenotypes differ by genetic risk factor is unknown. ObjectivesWe aimed to: 1) identify sex and genotype differences in early operant training and two-arm spatial restless bandit task performance; 2) examine the effects of an NMDAR antagonist on task performance and strategy across genotypes. Methods16p11.2 duplication and wildtype mice completed a series of training schedules of escalating difficulty followed by bandit tasks. MK-801 and saline were administered in alternating sessions prior to later bandit task performance. ResultsLarge sex differences in early operant training revealed some male-biased impacts of 16p11.2 duplication, contingent on training schedule difficulty. Once on the two-arm spatial restless bandit task, 16p11.2 duplication was no longer a strong contributor to decision making. However, MK-801 decreased the tendency to stay with a rewarded choice, lowered the probability of selecting the highest rewarded option, and decreased the influence of prior outcomes on choice. ConclusionsThe male-biased vulnerability in early operant training suggests that strategies for learning early schemas or in novel environments may be impacted by 16p11.2 duplication in males. In contrast, NMDAR are influential in the ability to flexibly switch between choices, and disrupting this function significantly impairs decision making in all animals.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Right-sided brain lesions predominate among patients with lesional mania: evidence from a systematic review and pooled lesion analysis

BackgroundDespite claims that lesional mania is associated with right-hemisphere lesions, supporting evidence is scarce, and association with specific brain areas has not been demonstrated.\n\nAimsTo test whether focal brain lesions in lesional mania are more often right-than left-sided, and if lesions converge on areas relevant to mood regulation.\n\nMethodsWe performed a systematic literature search (PROSPERO registration CRD42016053675) on PubMed and Web-Of-Science, using terms that reflected diagnoses and structures of interest, and lesional mechanisms. Two researchers reviewed the articles separately according to PRISMA Guidelines, to select reports of adult-onset hypomania, mania or mixed state following a focal brain lesion. When available, eligible lesion images were manually traced onto the corresponding slices of MNI space, and lesion topography analyzed using standard brain atlases. Pooled-analyses of individual patient data were performed.\n\nResultsData from 207 lesional mania patients was extracted from 110 reports. Among patients with focal lesions (N=197) more patients had lesions involving the right (84.3%) than the left (34.5%) hemisphere. Among 54 lesion images that were available, right-sided predominance of lesions was confirmed, and found to be was conserved across multiple brain regions, including the temporal lobe, fusiform gyrus and thalamus. These, in addition to several frontal lobe areas, were also identified as preferential lesion sites in comparisons with control lesions.\n\nConclusionsPooled-analyses, based on the most comprehensive dataset of lesional mania available to date, confirm a preferential association with right-hemisphere lesions, while suggesting that several brain areas/circuits, relevant to mood regulation, are most frequently affected.

neuroscience↗