Biology subjects

Vega Thurber, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Vega Thurber, R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Inconsistent patterns of microbial diversity and composition between highly similar sequencing protocols: a case study with reef-building corals

16S rRNA gene profiling (amplicon sequencing) is a popular technique for understanding host-associated and environmental microbial communities. Most protocols for sequencing amplicon libraries follow a standardized pipeline that can differ slightly depending on laboratory facility and user. Given that the same variable region of the 16S gene is targeted, it is generally accepted that sequencing output from differing protocols are comparable and this assumption underlies our ability to identify universal patterns in microbial dynamics through meta-analyses. However, discrepant results from a combined 16S rRNA dataset prepared by two labs whose protocols differed only in DNA polymerase and sequencing platform led us to scrutinize the outputs and challenge the idea of confidently combining them for standard microbiome analysis. Using technical replicates of reef-building coral samples from two species, Montipora aequituberculata and Porites lobata, we evaluated the consistency of alpha and beta diversity metrics between data resulting from these highly similar protocols. While we found minimal variation in alpha diversity between platform, significant differences were revealed with most beta diversity metrics, dependent on host species. These inconsistencies persisted following removal of low abundance taxa and when comparing across higher taxonomic levels, suggesting that bacterial community differences associated with sequencing protocol are likely to be context dependent and difficult to correct without extensive validation work. The results of this study encourage caution in the statistical comparison and interpretation of studies that combine rRNA sequence data from distinct protocols and point to a need for further work identifying mechanistic causes of these observed differences. ImportanceAmplicon sequencing remains a popular technique for characterizing organism and environmental microbiomes. The publication of sequence data from microbiome studies on open-access repositories provides an opportunity to identify universal patterns in microbial dynamics. To this end, it has been widely accepted that sequencing output from differing protocols are comparable and can be combined for analysis, so long as the same gene region is targeted. While most protocols for amplicon sequencing follow standardized pipelines, they can differ slightly between laboratory facility and user. In this study, we compared technical replicates of coral samples to evaluate the efficacy of combining organism-associated microbial datasets derived from two differing protocols. We found inconsistencies in the differences between bacterial communities, which persisted following data manipulations intended to increase comparability. These results suggest caution must be taken in the statistical comparison and interpretation of studies that combine data derived from distinct protocols.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2021

Evaluation of the effects of library preparation procedure and sample characteristics on the accuracy of metagenomic profiles

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing has transformed our understanding of microbial community ecology. However, preparing metagenomic libraries for high-throughput DNA sequencing remains a costly, labor-intensive, and time-consuming procedure, which in turn limits the utility of metagenomes. Several library preparation procedures have recently been developed to offset these costs, but it is unclear how these newer procedures compare to current standards in the field. In particular, it is not clear if all such procedures perform equally well across different types of microbial communities, or if features of the biological samples being processed (e.g., DNA amount) impact the accuracy of the approach. To address these questions, we assessed how five different shotgun DNA sequence library preparation methods, including the commonly used Nextera(R) Flex kit, perform when applied to metagenomic DNA. We measured each methods ability to produce metagenomic data that accurately represents the underlying taxonomic and genetic diversity of the community. We performed these analyses across a range of microbial community types (e.g., soil, coral-associated, mouse-gut-associated) and input DNA amounts. We find that the type of community and amount of input DNA influence each methods performance, indicating that careful consideration may be needed when selecting between methods, especially for low complexity communities. However, cost-effective preparation methods we assessed are generally comparable to the current gold standard Nextera(R) DNA Flex kit for high-complexity communities. Overall, the results from this analysis will help expand and even facilitate access to metagenomic approaches in future studies. IMPORTANCEMetagenomic library preparation methods and sequencing technologies continue to advance rapidly, allowing researchers to characterize microbial communities in previously underexplored environmental samples and systems. However, widely-accepted standardized library preparation methods can be cost-prohibitive. Newly available approaches may be less expensive, but their efficacy in comparison to standardized methods remains unknown. In this study, we compared five different metagenomic library preparation methods. We evaluated each method across a range of microbial communities varying in complexity and quantity of input DNA. Our findings demonstrate the importance of considering sample properties, including community type, composition, and DNA amount, when choosing the most appropriate metagenomic library preparation method.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2021

The coral symbiont Candidatus Aquarickettsia is variably abundant in threatened Caribbean acroporids and transmitted horizontally.

The aquatic symbiont "Candidatus Aquarickettsia rohweri" infects a diversity of non-bilaterian metazoan phyla. In the threatened coral Acropora cervicornis, Aquarickettsia proliferates in response to increased nutrient exposure, resulting in suppressed growth and increased disease susceptibility and mortality. This study evaluated the extent, as well as the ecology and evolution of Aquarickettsia infecting the Caribbean corals: Ac. cervicornis and Ac. palmata and their hybrid ( Ac. prolifera). The bacterial parasite Aquarickettsia was found in all acroporids, with host and sampling location impacting infection magnitude. Phylogenomic and genome-wide single nucleotide variant analysis found Aquarickettsia clustering by region, not by coral taxon. Fixation analysis suggested within coral colonies, Aquarickettsia are genetically isolated to the extent that reinfection is unlikely. Relative to other Rickettsiales, Aquarickettsia is undergoing positive selection, with Florida populations experiencing greater positive selection relative to the other Caribbean locations. This may be due to Aquarickettsia response to increased nutrient stress in Florida, as indicated by greater in situ replication rates in these corals. Aquarickettsia did not significantly codiversify with either coral animal nor algal symbiont, and qPCR analysis of gametes and juveniles from susceptible coral genotypes indicated absence in early life stages. Thus, despite being an obligate parasite, Aquarickettsia must be horizontally transmitted via coral mucocytes, an unidentified secondary host, or a yet unexplored environmentally mediated mechanism. Importantly, the prevalence of Aquarickettsia in Ac. cervicornis and high abundance in Florida populations suggests that disease mitigation efforts in the US and Caribbean should focus on preventing early infection via horizontal transmission.

microbiology↗