Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Vannuscorps, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Vannuscorps, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Body movement perception is shaped by both generic and actor-specific models of human bodies

Body movement perception is shaped by knowledge of the human body biomechanics. Apparent motion elicited by rapidly alternating pictures follows the shortest path between two body postures only if it is biomechanically plausible. And although we tend to perceive the location of a moving body part as slightly shifted forward along its trajectory, this perceptual extrapolation is absent (or reduced) if the movement would have been unlikely to continue along the same trajectory because of the body biomechanical constraints. The received view is that perception is shaped by a model of the observers own body. Here, we report three lines of evidence suggesting otherwise. First, we report the typical influence of knowledge of the upper limb biomechanics on apparent movement perception and perceptual extrapolation in two individuals born completely without (upper and lower) limbs (Experiments 1 and 2). Second, we report that we failed to find evidence that observers own biomechanics influence perceptual extrapolation of body movements (Experiment 3). Third, we show that participants perception is influenced by their knowledge of actor-specific biomechanics (Experiments 4- 8). We conclude that body movement perception is shaped by visually acquired models of both generic and actor-specific body biomechanics. Public significance statementAlthough information about others body movements reaches our visual system with a considerable delay, we can interact with them in real-time. Although we often blink, we perceive uninterrupted body movements. To solve the problems posed by informational lag and intermittence, the visual system appears to rely on knowledge of the human body biomechanics to extrapolate the most likely future (or unseen) position of observed limb movements. For the last 20 years, the received view has been that perceptual "filling-in" and extrapolation of others body movements are underpinned by a model of the observers own body, acquired through motor experience and proprioceptive feedback. Here, we report three lines of evidence indicating that body movement perception is rather shaped by visually acquired models of both generic and actor-specific body biomechanics. These findings provide new insight into how the human visual system extrapolates future body positions.

neuroscience↗

Large-scale organization of the hand action observation network in individuals born without hands

The human high-level visual cortex comprises regions specialized for the processing of distinct types of stimuli, such as objects, animals, and human actions. How does this specialization emerge? Here, we investigated the role of sensorimotor experience in shaping the organization of the action observation network as a window on this question. Observed body movements are frequently coupled with corresponding motor codes, e.g. during monitoring ones own movements and imitation, resulting in bidirectionally connected circuits between areas involved in body movements observation (e.g., of the hand) and the motor codes involved in their execution. If the organization of the action observation network is shaped by this sensorimotor coupling, then, it should not form for body movements that do not belong to individuals motor repertoire. To test this prediction, we used fMRI to investigate the spatial arrangement and functional properties of the hand and foot action observation circuits in individuals born without upper limbs. Multivoxel pattern decoding, pattern similarity, and univariate analyses revealed an intact hand action observation network in the individuals born without upper limbs. This suggests that the organization of the action observation network does not require effector-specific visuomotor coupling.

neuroscience↗

Limitations of compensatory plasticity: the organization of the primary sensorimotor cortex in foot-using bilateral upper limb dysplasics

What forces direct brain organization and its plasticity? When a brain region is deprived of its input would this region reorganize based on compensation for the disability and experience, or would strong limitations of brain structure limit its plasticity? People born without hands activate their sensorimotor hand region while moving body parts used to compensate for this ability (e.g. their feet). This has been taken to suggest a neural organization based on functions, such as performing manual-like dexterous actions, rather than on body parts. Here we test the selectivity for functionally-compensatory body parts in the sensorimotor cortex of people born without hands. Despite clear compensatory foot use, the sensorimotor hand area in the dysplasic subjects showed preference for body parts whose cortical territory is close to the hand area, but which are not compensatorily used as effectors. This suggests that function-based organization, originally proposed for congenital blindness and deafness, does not apply to cases of the primary sensorimotor cortex deprivation in dysplasia. This is consistent with the idea that experience-independent functional specialization occurs at relatively high levels of representation. Indeed, increased and selective foot movement preference in the dysplasics was found in the association cortex, in the inferior parietal lobule. Furthermore, it stresses the roles of neuroanatomical constraints such as topographical proximity and connectivity in determining the functional development of brain regions. These findings reveal limitations to brain plasticity and to the role of experience in shaping the functional organization of the brain.\n\nSignificance StatementWhat determines the role of brain regions, and their plasticity when typical inputs or experience is not provided? To what extent can extreme compensatory use affect brain organization? We tested the functional reorganization of the primary sensorimotor cortex hand area in people born without hands, who use their feet for every-day tasks. We found that it is preferentially activated by close-by body-parts which cannot serve as effectors, and not by the feet. In contrast, foot-selective compensatory plasticity was found in the association cortex, in an area involved in tool use. This shows limitations of compensatory plasticity and experience in modifying brain organization of early topographical cortex, as compared to association cortices where function-based organization is the driving factor.\n\nClassificationBiological Sciences\\Neuroscience

neuroscience↗