Biology subjects

Vandekar, S. N.

Publications and source records attributed to Vandekar, S. N..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Analytic Bounds on GAMLSS Model Variability of Normative White Matter Brain Charts

Brain charts, or normative models of quantitative neuroimaging measures, can identify trajectories of brain development and abnormalities in groups and individuals by leveraging large populations. Recent work has extended these brain charts to model microstructural and macrostructural features of white matter. Assessments of variance for these brain charts are necessary to determine whether the models being used for these data are stable. We implement an analytic approach to characterize variability of the parameters in previously released brain charts created using the generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) framework. Additionally, we empirically validate the accuracy of each analytic model through a comparison to a bootstrapping approach from 0.2 to 90 years of age. We find that across all models, the analytic coefficient of variation (COV) remains below 5% for ages greater than 0.25 years, with the maximum empirical observed COV reaching 7% at 0.2 years of age. Further, the empirical assessment shows high agreement with the analytic assessment, with COV estimates averaged across the lifespan for all models having a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.776 and a mean difference of 4 x 10-4. Both methods exhibit volume and surface area as the features with the largest average COV for the majority of tracts. However, the analytic assessment yields axial diffusivity as the feature most frequently having the smallest COV, whereas the corresponding feature for the empirical assessment is average length. These results suggest that the analytic approach overestimates model stability for WM brain charts when the COV is low and that the validation method is suitable for assessing whether GAMLSS models are unstable.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2025

White matter microstructure and macrostructure brain charts across the human lifespan

Normative reference charts are widely used in healthcare, especially for assessing the development of individuals by benchmarking anatomic and physiological features against population trajectories across the lifespan. Recent work has extended this concept to gray matter morphology in the brain, but no such reference framework currently exists for white matter (WM) even though WM constitutes the essential substrate for neuronal communication and large-scale network integration. Here, we present the first comprehensive WM brain charts, which describe how microstructural and macrostructural features of WM evolve across the lifespan, by leveraging over 35,120 diffusion MRI scans from 50 harmonized studies. Using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS), we estimate age- and sex-stratified trajectories for 72 individual white matter pathways, quantifying both tract-specific microstructural and morphometric features. We demonstrate that these WM brain charts enable four important applications: (1) defining normative trajectories of WM maturation and decline across distinct pathways, (2) identifying previously uncharacterized developmental milestones and spatial gradients of tract maturation, (3) detecting individualized deviations from normative patterns with clinical relevance across multiple neurological disorders, and (4) facilitating standardized, cross-study centile scoring of new datasets. By establishing a unified, interpretable reference framework for WM structure, these brain charts provide a foundational metric for research and clinical neuroscience. The accompanying open-access trajectories, centile scoring tools, and harmonization methods facilitate precise mapping of WM development, aging, and pathology across diverse populations. We release the brain charts and provide an out-of-sample alignment process as a Docker image: https://zenodo.org/records/17561821.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Mapping individual differences in intermodal coupling in neurodevelopment

Within-individual coupling between measures of brain structure and function evolves in development and may underlie differential risk for neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite increasing interest in the development of structure-function relationships, rigorous methods to quantify and test individual differences in coupling remain nascent. In this article, we explore and address gaps in approaches for testing and spatially localizing individual differences in intermodal coupling, including a new method, called CEIDR. CEIDR controls false positives in individual differences in intermodal correlations that arise from mean and variance heterogeneity and improves statistical power by adopting adaptive cluster enhancement. Through a comparison across different approaches to testing individual differences in intermodal coupling, we delineate subtle differences in the hypotheses they test, which may ultimately lead researchers to arrive at different results. Finally, we illustrate these differences in two applications to brain development using data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Evaluation of resampling-based inference for topological features of neuroimages

Many recent studies have demonstrated the inflated type 1 error rate of the original Gaussian random field (GRF) methods for inference of neuroimages and identified resampling (permutation and bootstrapping) methods that have better performance. There has been no evaluation of resampling procedures when using robust (sandwich) statistical images with different topological features (TF) used for neuroimaging inference. Here, we consider estimation of distributions TFs of a statistical image and evaluate resampling procedures that can be used when exchangeability is violated. We compare the methods using realistic simulations and study sex differences in life-span age-related changes in gray matter volume in the Nathan Kline Institute Rockland sample. We find that our proposed wild bootstrap and the commonly used permutation procedure perform well in sample sizes above 50 under realistic simulations with heteroskedasticity. The Rademacher wild bootstrap has fewer assumptions than the permutation and performs similarly in samples of 100 or more, so is valid in a broader range of conditions. We also evaluate the GRF-based pTFCE method and show that it has inflated error rates in samples less than 200. Our R package, pbj, is available on Github and allows the user to reproducibly implement various resampling-based group level neuroimage analyses.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Network Enrichment Significance Testing in Brain-Phenotype Association Studies

Functional networks often guide our interpretation of spatial maps of brain-phenotype associations. However, methods for assessing enrichment of associations within networks of interest have varied in terms of both scientific rigor and underlying assumptions. While some approaches have relied on subjective interpretations, others have made unrealistic assumptions about the spatial structure of imaging data, leading to inflated false positive rates. We seek to address this gap in existing methodology by borrowing insight from a method widely used in genomics research for testing enrichment of associations between a set of genes and a phenotype of interest. We propose Network Enrichment Significance Testing (NEST), a flexible framework for testing the specificity of brain-phenotype associations to functional networks or other sub-regions of the brain. We apply NEST to study phenotype associations with structural and functional brain imaging data from a large-scale neurodevelopmental cohort study.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Consensus tissue domain detection in spatial -omics data using MILWRM

Spatially resolved molecular assays provide high dimensional genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and epigenetic information in situ and at various resolutions. Pairing these data across modalities with histological features enables powerful studies of tissue pathology in the context of an intact microenvironment and tissue structure. Increasing dimensions across molecular analytes and samples require new data science approaches to functionally annotate spatially resolved molecular data. A specific challenge is data-driven cross-sample domain detection that allows for analysis within and between consensus tissue compartments across high volumes of multiplex datasets stemming from tissue atlasing efforts. Here, we present MILWRM - multiplex image labeling with regional morphology - a Python package for rapid, multi-scale tissue domain detection and annotation. We demonstrate MILWRMs utility in identifying histologically distinct compartments in human colonic polyps and mouse brain slices through spatially-informed clustering in two different spatial data modalities. Additionally, we used tissue domains detected in human colonic polyps to elucidate molecular distinction between polyp subtypes. We also explored the ability of MILWRM to identify anatomical regions of mouse brain and their respective distinct molecular profiles.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Spatially-enhanced clusterwise inference for testing and localizing intermodal correspondence

With the increasing availability of neuroimaging data from multiple modalities--each providing a different lens through which to study brain structure or function--new techniques for comparing, integrating, and interpreting information within and across modalities have emerged. Recent developments include hypothesis tests of associations between neuroimaging modalities, which can be used to determine the statistical significance of intermodal associations either throughout the entire brain or within anatomical subregions or functional networks. While these methods provide a crucial foundation for inference on intermodal relationships, they cannot be used to answer questions about where in the brain these associations are most pronounced. In this paper, we introduce a new method, called CLEAN-R, that can be used both to test intermodal correspondence throughout the brain and also to localize this correspondence. Our method involves first adjusting for the underlying spatial autocorrelation structure within each modality before aggregating information within small clusters to construct a map of enhanced test statistics. Using structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging data from a subsample of children and adolescents from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, we conduct simulations and data analyses where we illustrate the high statistical power and nominal type I error levels of our method. By constructing an interpretable map of group-level correspondence using spatially-enhanced test statistics, our method offers insights beyond those provided by earlier methods.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

A simple permutation-based test of intermodal correspondence

Many key findings in neuroimaging studies involve similarities between brain maps, but statistical methods used to measure these findings have varied. Current state-of-the-art methods involve comparing observed group-level brain maps (after averaging intensities at each image location across multiple subjects) against spatial null models of these group-level maps. However, these methods typically make strong and potentially unrealistic statistical assumptions, such as covariance stationarity. To address these issues, in this paper we propose using subject-level data and a classical permutation testing framework to test and assess similarities between brain maps. Our method is comparable to traditional permutation tests in that it involves randomly permuting subjects to generate a null distribution of intermodal correspondence statistics, which we compare to an observed statistic to estimate a p-value. We apply and compare our method in simulated and real neuroimaging data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. We show that our method performs well for detecting relationships between modalities known to be strongly related (cortical thickness and sulcal depth), and it is conservative when an association would not be expected (cortical thickness and activation on the n-back working memory task). Notably, our method is the most flexible and reliable for localizing intermodal relationships within subregions of the brain and allows for generalizable statistical inference.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Normative Brain Size Variation and the Remodeling of Brain Shape in Humans

Evolutionary and developmental increases in primate brain size have been accompanied by systematic shifts in the proportionality of different primate brain systems. However, it remains unknown if and how brain patterning varies across the more than 2-fold inter-individual variation in brain size that occurs amongst typically-developing humans. Using in vivo neuroimaging data from 2 independent cohorts totaling nearly 3000 individuals, we find that larger-brained humans show preferential areal expansion within specific fronto-parietal cortical networks (default mode, dorsal attentional) and related subcortical regions, at the expense of primary sensory/motor systems. This targeted areal expansion recapitulates cortical remodeling across evolution, manifests by early childhood and is linked to molecular signatures of heightened metabolic cost. Our results define a new organizing principle in human brain patterning which governs the highly-coordinated remodeling of human brain shape as a function of naturally-occurring variations in brain size.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryA hodologically and metabolically expensive brain network is preferentially expanded in larger-brained humans.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

The correspondence problem: which brain maps are significantly similar?

A critical issue in many neuroimaging studies is the comparison between brain maps. How should we test the hypothesis that two or more brain maps are partially convergent or overlap to a significant extent? This \"correspondence problem\" affects, for example, the interpretation of comparisons between task-based patterns of functional activation, resting-state networks or modules, and neuroanatomical landmarks. In published work, this problem has been addressed with remarkable variability in terms of methodological approaches and statistical rigor. In this paper, we address the correspondence problem using a spatial permutation framework to generate null models of overlap, by applying random rotations to spherical representations of the cortical surface. We use this approach to derive clusters of cognitive functions that are significantly similar in terms of their functional neuroatomical substrates. In addition, using publicly available data, we formally demonstrate the correspondence between maps of task-based functional activity, resting-state fMRI networks and gyral-based anatomical landmarks. We provide open-access code to implement the methods presented for two commonly-used tools for surface based cortical analysis. This spatial permutation approach constitutes a useful advance over widely-used methods for the comparison of cortical maps, and thereby opens up new possibilities for the integration of diverse neuroimaging data.

neuroscience↗