Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Vance, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Vance, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A neuronal signature for monogamous reunion

Pair bond formation depends vitally on neuromodulatory signaling within the nucleus accumbens, but the neuronal dynamics underlying this behavior remain unclear. Using in vivo Ca2+ imaging in monogamous prairie voles, we found that pair bonding does not elicit differences in overall nucleus accumbens Ca2+ activity. Instead, we identified distinct neuronal ensembles in this region recruited during approach to either a partner or novel vole. The partner-approach neuronal ensemble increased in size following bond formation and differences in the size of approach ensembles for partner and novel voles predicts bond strength. In contrast, neurons comprising departure ensembles do not change over time and are not correlated with bond strength indicating that ensemble plasticity is specific to partner approach. Further, the neurons comprising partner and novel approach ensembles are non-overlapping while departure ensembles are more overlapping than chance, which may reflect another key feature of approach ensembles. We posit that the features of the partner approach ensemble and its expansion upon bond formation make it a potential key substrate underlying bond formation and maturation.\n\nHighlightsO_LIWe performed in vivo Ca2+ in the nucleus accumbens of pair bonded prairie voles\nC_LIO_LIOverall nucleus accumbens activity did not differ during partner versus stranger interaction\nC_LIO_LIDistinct approach neurons exist for the partner and for the stranger\nC_LIO_LIPartner-approach ensemble increases as partner preference emerges\nC_LIO_LIWe identify a putative neuronal substrate underlying bond formation and maturation\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

Failure to detect synergy between variants in transferrin and hemochromatosis and Alzheimer’s disease in large cohort

Alzheimers disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and, despite decades of effort, there is no effective treatment. In the last decade, many association studies have identified genetic markers that are associated with AD status. Two of these studies suggest that an epistatic interaction between variants rs1049296 in the Transferrin (TF) gene and rs1800562 in the Homeostatic Iron Regulator (HFE) gene, commonly known as \"the hemochromatosis gene\", is in genetic association with AD. TF and HFE are involved in the transport and regulation of iron in the brain, and disrupting these processes exacerbates AD pathology through increased neurodegeneration and oxidative stress. However, by using a significantly larger dataset from the Alzheimers Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), we fail to detect an association between TF rs1049296 or HFE rs1800562 with AD risk (TF rs1049296 p=0.38 and HFE rs1800562 p=0.40). In addition, logistic regression with an interaction term and a Synergy Factor Analysis (SFA) both failed to detect epistasis between TF rs1049296 and HFE rs1800562 (SF=0.94; p=0.48) in AD cases. Each of these analyses had sufficient statistical power (Power>0.99), suggesting that previously-reported associations may be the result of more complex epistatic interactions, genetic heterogeneity, or were false-positive associations due to limited sample sizes.

genetics↗