Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Van Rijn, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Van Rijn, H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Implicit Learning of Temporal Behavior in Complex Dynamic Environments

Humans can automatically detect and learn to exploit repeated aspects (regularities) of the environment. Timing research suggests that such learning is not only used to anticipate what will happen, but also when. However, in timing experiments, the intervals to be timed are presented in isolation from other stimuli and explicitly cued, contrasting with naturalistic environments in which intervals are embedded in a constant stream of events and individuals are hardly aware of them. It is unclear whether laboratory findings from timing research translate to a more ecologically valid, implicit environment. Here we show in a game-like experiment, specifically designed to measure naturalistic behavior, that participants implicitly use regular intervals to anticipate future events, even when these intervals are constantly interrupted by irregular yet behaviorally relevant events. This finding extends previous research by showing that individuals not only detect such regularities but can also use this knowledge to decide when to act in a complex environment. Furthermore, this finding demonstrates that this type of learning can occur independently from the ordinal sequence of motor actions, which contrasts this work with earlier motor learning studies. Taken together, our results demonstrate that regularities in the time between events are implicitly monitored and used to predict and act on what happens when, thereby showing that laboratory findings from timing research can generalize to naturalistic environments. Additionally, with the development of our game-like experiment we demonstrate an approach to test cognitive theories in less controlled, ecologically more valid environments.

neuroscience↗

Precision timing with alpha-beta oscillatory coupling: stopwatch or motor control?

Precise timing is crucial for many behaviors ranging from street crossing, conversational speech, to athletic performance. The precision of motor timing has been suggested to result from the strength of phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) between the phase of alpha oscillations (, 8-12 Hz) and the power of beta activity ({beta}, 14-30 Hz), herein referred to as -{beta} PAC. The amplitude of {beta} oscillations has been proposed to code for temporally relevant information, and the locking of {beta} power to the phase of oscillations to maintain timing precision. Motor timing precision has at least two sources of variability: variability of timekeeping mechanism and variability of motor control. There is ambiguity to with of these two factors -{beta} PAC could be ascribed to. Whether -{beta} PAC indexes precision of internal timekeeping mechanisms like a stopwatch, or -{beta} PAC indexes motor control precision is unclear. To disentangle these two hypotheses, we tested how oscillatory coupling at different stages of time reproduction related to temporal precision. Human participants perceived, and subsequently reproduced, a time interval while magnetoencephalography was recorded. The data show a robust -{beta} PAC during both the encoding and the reproduction of a temporal interval, a pattern which could not be predicted for by the motor control account. Specifically, we found that timing precision resulted from the tradeoff between the strength of -{beta} PAC during the encoding and during the reproduction of intervals. We interpret these results as supporting evidence for the hypothesis that -{beta} PAC codes for precision of temporal representations in the human brain.\n\nHighlights- Encoding and reproducing temporal intervals implicate -{beta} PAC.\n- -{beta} PAC does not represent solely motor control.\n- -{beta} PAC maintains the precision of temporal representations.

neuroscience↗