Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Van Geertruyden, J.-P.

Publications and source records attributed to Van Geertruyden, J.-P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Assessing Ebola Virus Circulation in the Tshuapa Province (Democratic Republic of the Congo): A One Health Investigation of Wildlife and Human Interactions

The wildlife reservoir and spillover mechanisms of the Ebola virus remain elusive despite extensive research efforts in endemic areas. This study employed a One Health approach to examine the virus circulation in wildlife and the associated human exposure risks in the Tshuapa province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In 2021, we collected 1015 samples from 888 animals, predominantly small mammals, and 380 inhabitants of Inkanamongo village, the site of an Ebola virus disease outbreak in 2014. These samples were screened for evidence of current (RNA) or past (IgG antibodies) Ebola virus infections. We also conducted interviews with 167 individuals in the surrounding districts to assess their interactions with wildlife. While no Ebola virus RNA was detected in the wildlife samples, anti-orthoebolavirus IgG antibodies were found in 13 bats and 38 rodents. Among the human participants, 120 individuals had IgG antibodies against at least one orthoebolavirus antigen, with 12 showing seropositivity for two antigens of the same orthoebolavirus, despite not having a prior Ebola disease diagnosis. Furthermore, over 50% of respondents reported frequent visits to the forest to hunt a variety of wild animals, particularly ungulates and rodents, which could account for occasional viral spillovers. The absence of active Ebola virus circulation in wildlife may reflect seasonal patterns in reservoir ecology, like those observed in bats. Similarly, seasonal human activities, like hunting and foraging, may result in periodic exposure risks. These findings highlight the importance of continuous, multidisciplinary surveillance to monitor changes in seasonal spillover risks.

molecular biology↗

Prevalence and genotype-specific distribution of Human papillomavirus in Burundi according to HIV status and urban or rural residence and its implications for control

BackgroundHuman papillomaviruses are the most important causative agents for invasive cervical cancer development. HPV type-specific vaccination and HPV cervical cancer screening methods are being widely recommended to control the disease but the epidemiology of the circulating HPV types may vary locally. The circulating HPV-strains have never been assessed in Burundi. This study determined the prevalence and genotype-specific distribution of HPV in four different strata in Burundi: HIV-infected or non-infected and women living in rural or urban areas. Implications for HPV diagnosis and vaccine implementation was discussed.\n\nMethodsFour cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Burundi (2013 in a rural area and 2016 in urban area) among rural and urban HIV-infected and uninfected women. Cytology and HPV genotyping was performed to screen women for cervical cancer lesions. Risk factors for HPV infection and cervical cancer lesions were determined using logistic regression model.\n\nResultsHPV prevalence was very high in urban area with significant differences between HIV-positive and negative women (p<0.0001). In fact, 45.7% of HIV-positive participants were infected with any HPV type and all were infected with at least one HR/pHR-HPV type. Among the HIV-negative participants, 13.4% were HPV-infected, of whom, only 4 women (2.7%) were infected with HR/pHR-HPV types. In rural, HPV infection did not significantly differ between HIV-positive and negative women (30.0% and 31.3% respectively; p=0.80).\n\nIn urban, multiple infections with HR/pHR-HPV types were detected in 13.9% and 2.7% among HIV-positive and negative women respectively (p<0.0001), whereas in rural, multiple infections with HR/pHR-HPV types were detected in 4.7% and 3.3% of HIV positive and negative women respectively (p=0.56).\n\nThe most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types in HIV-positive urban women were HPV 52, 51 and 56. In the HIV-negative urban women, the most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types were HPV 66, 67 and 18. In HIV-positive rural women, the most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types were HPV 66, 16 and 18. In the HIV-negative rural women, the most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types were HPV 16, 66 and 18. Independent risk factors associated with cervical lesions were HPV and HIV infections.\n\nConclusionsThere is a high burden of HR/pHR-HPV infections, in particular among HIV-infected urban women. The study points out the need to introduce a comprehensive cervical cancer control program adapted to the context. This study shows that the nonavalent vaccine covers most of the HR/pHR-HPV infections in rural and urban areas among HIV-infected and uninfected women.

epidemiology↗