Biology subjects

Valkanas, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Valkanas, E..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

The landscape of gene loss and missense variation across the mammalian tree informs on gene essentiality

BackgroundThe degree of gene and sequence preservation across species provides valuable insights into the relative necessity of genes from the perspective of natural selection. Here, we developed novel interspecies metrics across 462 mammalian species, GISMO (Gene identity score of mammalian orthologs) and GISMO-mis (GISMO-missense), to quantify gene loss traversing millions of years of evolution. GISMO is a measure of gene loss across mammals weighed by evolutionary distance relative to humans, whereas GISMO-mis quantifies the ratio of missense to synonymous variants across mammalian species for a given gene. RationaleDespite large sample sizes, current human constraint metrics are still not well calibrated for short genes. Traversing over 100 million years of evolution across hundreds of mammals can identify the most essential genes and improve gene-disease association. Beyond human genetics, these metrics provide measures of gene constraint to further enable mammalian genetics research. ResultsOur analyses showed that both metrics are strongly correlated with measures of human gene constraint for loss-of-function, missense, and copy number dosage derived from upwards of a million human samples, which highlight the power of interspecies constraint. Importantly, neither GISMO nor GISMO-mis are strongly correlated with coding sequence length. Therefore both metrics can identify novel constrained genes that were too small for existing human constraint metrics to capture. We also found that GISMO scores capture rare variant association signals across a range of phenotypes associated with decreased fecundity, such as schizophrenia, autism, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Moreover, common variant heritability of disease traits are highly enriched in the most constrained deciles of both metrics, further underscoring the biological relevance of these metrics in identifying functionally important genes. We further showed that both scores have the lowest duplication and deletion rate in the most constrained deciles for copy number variants in the UK Biobank, suggesting that it may be an important metric for dosage sensitivity. We additionally demonstrate that GISMO can improve prioritization of recessive disorder genes and captures homozygous selection. ConclusionsOverall, we demonstrate that the most constrained genes for gene loss and missense variation capture the largest fraction of heritability, GISMO can help prioritize recessive disorder genes, and identify the most conserved genes across the mammalian tree. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=168 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/594531v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (79K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11c3e46org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13c6e70org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@76a6c7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bf8d86_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

Systematic evaluation of genome sequencing as a first-tier diagnostic test for prenatal and pediatric disorders

Current clinical guidelines recommend three genetic tests for the assessment of fetal structural anomalies: karyotype to detect microscopically-visible balanced and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements, chromosomal microarray (CMA) to detect sub-microscopic copy number variants (CNVs), and exome sequencing (ES) to identify individual nucleotide changes in coding sequence. Advances in genome sequencing (GS) analysis suggest that it is poised to displace the sequential application of all three conventional tests to become a single diagnostic approach for the assessment of fetal structural anomalies. However, systematic benchmarking is required to assure that GS can capture the full mutational spectrum associated with fetal structural anomalies and to accurately quantify the added diagnostic yield of GS. We applied a novel GS analytic framework that included the discovery, filtration, and interpretation of nine classes of genomic variation to 7,195 individuals. We assessed the sensitivity of GS to detect diagnostic variants (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) from three standard-of-care tests using 1,612 autism spectrum disorder quartet families (ASD; n=6,448) with matched GS, ES, and CMA data, and validated these findings in 46 fetuses with a clinically reportable variant originally identified by karyotype, CMA, or ES. We then assessed the added diagnostic yield of GS in 249 trios (n=747) comprising a fetus with a structural anomaly detected by ultrasound and two unaffected parents that were pre-screened with a combination of all three standard-of-care tests. Across both cohorts, our GS analytic framework identified 98.2% of all diagnostic variants detected by standard-of-care tests, including 100% of those originally detected by CMA (n=88) and ES (n=61), as well as 78.6% (n=11/14) of the chromosomal rearrangements identified by karyotype. The diagnostic yield from GS was 7.8% across all 1,612 ASD probands, almost two-fold more than CMA (4.4%) and three-fold more than ES (3.0%). We also demonstrated that the yield of ES can approach that of GS when CNVs are captured with high sensitivity from exome data (7.4% vs. 7.8%, respectively). In 249 pre-screened fetuses with structural anomalies, GS provided an additional diagnostic yield of 0.4% beyond the combination of all three tests (karyotype, CMA, and ES). Applying our benchmarking results to existing data indicates that GS can achieve an overall diagnostic yield of 46.1% in unselected fetuses with fetal structural anomalies, providing an estimated 17.2% increase in diagnostic yield over karyotype, 14.1% over CMA, and 36.1% over ES when sequence variants are assessed, and 4.1% when CNVs are also identified from exome data. In this study we demonstrate that GS is sensitive to the detection of almost all pathogenic variation captured by karyotype, CMA, and ES, provides a superior diagnostic yield than any individual test by a wide margin, and contributes a modest increase in diagnostic yield beyond the combination of all three tests. We also outline several strategies to aid the interpretation of GS variants that are cryptic to conventional technologies, which we anticipate will be increasingly encountered as comprehensive variant identification from GS is performed. Taken together, these data suggest GS warrants consideration as a first-tier diagnostic approach for fetal structural anomalies.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

An open resource of structural variation for medical and population genetics

Structural variants (SVs) rearrange large segments of the genome and can have profound consequences for evolution and human diseases. As national biobanks, disease association studies, and clinical genetic testing grow increasingly reliant on genome sequencing, population references such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) have become integral for interpreting genetic variation. To date, no large-scale reference maps of SVs exist from high-coverage sequencing comparable to those available for point mutations in protein-coding genes. Here, we constructed a reference atlas of SVs across 14,891 genomes from diverse global populations (54% non-European) as a component of gnomAD. We discovered a rich landscape of 433,371 distinct SVs, including 5,295 multi-breakpoint complex SVs across 11 mutational subclasses, and examples of localized chromosome shattering, as in chromothripsis. The average individual harbored 7,439 SVs, which accounted for 25-29% of all rare protein-truncating events per genome. We found strong correlations between constraint against damaging point mutations and rare SVs that both disrupt and duplicate protein-coding sequence, suggesting intolerance to reciprocal dosage alterations for a subset of tightly regulated genes. We also uncovered modest selection against noncoding SVs in cis-regulatory elements, although selection against protein-truncating SVs was stronger than any effect on noncoding SVs. Finally, we benchmarked carrier rates for medically relevant SVs, finding very large ([≥]1Mb) rare SVs in 3.8% of genomes (~1:26 individuals) and clinically reportable incidental SVs in 0.18% of genomes (~1:556 individuals). These data have been integrated directly into the gnomAD browser (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) and will have broad utility for population genetics, disease association, and diagnostic screening.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Contribution of structural and intronic mutations to RPGRIP1-mediated inherited retinal dystrophies.

PurposeWith the advent of gene therapies for inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), genetic diagnostics will have an increasing role in clinical decision-making. Yet the genetic cause of disease cannot be identified using exon-based sequencing for a significant portion of patients. We hypothesized that non-coding mutations contribute significantly to the genetic causality of IRDs and evaluated patients with single coding mutations in RPGRIP1 to test this hypothesis.\n\nMethodsIRD families underwent targeted panel sequencing. Unsolved cases were explored by whole exome and genome sequencing looking for additional mutations. Candidate mutations were then validated by Sanger sequencing, quantitative PCR, and in vitro splicing assays in two cell lines analyzed through amplicon sequencing.\n\nResultsAmong 1722 families, three had biallelic loss of function mutations in RPGRIP1 while seven had a single disruptive coding mutation. Whole exome and genome sequencing revealed potential non-coding mutations in these seven families. In six, the non-coding mutations were shown to lead to loss of function in vitro.\n\nConclusionNon-coding mutations were identified in 6 of 7 families with single coding mutations in RPGRIP1. The results suggest that non-coding mutations contribute significantly to the genetic causality of IRDs and RPGRIP1-mediated IRDs are more common than previously thought.

genomics↗