Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Valente, B. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Valente, B. D..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Genomic prediction with whole-genome sequence data in intensely selected pig lines

BackgroundEarly simulations indicated that whole-genome sequence data (WGS) could improve genomic prediction accuracy and its persistence across generations and breeds. However, empirical results have been ambiguous so far. Large data sets that capture most of the genome diversity in a population must be assembled so that allele substitution effects are estimated with high accuracy. The objectives of this study were to use a large pig dataset to assess the benefits of using WGS for genomic prediction compared to using commercial marker arrays, to identify scenarios in which WGS provides the largest advantage, and to identify potential pitfalls for its effective implementation. MethodsWe sequenced 6,931 individuals from seven commercial pig lines with different numerical size. Genotypes of 32.8 million variants were imputed for 396,100 individuals (17,224 to 104,661 per line). We used BayesR to perform genomic prediction for eight complex traits. Genomic predictions were performed using either data from a marker array or variants preselected from WGS based on association tests. ResultsThe prediction accuracy with each set of preselected WGS variants was not robust across traits and lines and the improvements in prediction accuracy that we achieved so far with WGS compared to marker arrays were generally small. The most favourable results for WGS were obtained when the largest training sets were available and used to preselect variants with statistically significant associations to the trait for augmenting the established marker array. With this method and training sets of around 80k individuals, average improvements of genomic prediction accuracy of 0.025 were observed in within-line scenarios. ConclusionsOur results showed that WGS has a small potential to improve genomic prediction accuracy compared to marker arrays in intensely selected pig lines in some settings. Thus, although we expect that more robust improvements could be attained with a combination of larger training sets and optimised pipelines, the use of WGS in the current implementations of genomic prediction should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis against the cost of generating WGS at a large scale.

genomics↗

Rare and population-specific functional variation across pig lines

BackgroundIt is expected that functional, mainly missense and loss-of-function (LOF), and regulatory variants are responsible for phenotypic differences among breeds, genetic lines, and varieties of livestock and crop species that have undergone diverse selection histories. However, there is still limited knowledge about the existing missense and LOF variation in livestock commercial populations, in particular regarding population-specific variation and how it can affect applications such as across-breed genomic prediction. MethodsWe re-sequenced the whole genome of 7,848 individuals from nine commercial pig breeding lines (average sequencing coverage: 4.1x) and imputed whole-genome genotypes for 440,610 pedigree-related individuals. The called variants were categorized according to predicted functional annotation (from LOF to intergenic) and prevalence level (number of lines in which the variant segregated; from private to widespread). Variants in each category were examined in terms of distribution along the genome, minor allele frequency, Wrights fixation index (FST), individual load, and association to production traits. ResultsOf the 46 million called variants, 28% were private (called in only one line) and 21% were widespread (called in all nine lines). Genomic regions with low recombination rate were enriched with private variants. Low-prevalence variants (called in one or a few lines only) were enriched for lower allele frequencies, lower FST, and putatively functional and regulatory roles (including loss-of-function and deleterious missense variants). Only a small subset of low-prevalence variants was found at intermediate allele frequencies and had large estimated effects on production traits. Individuals on average carried less private deleterious missense alleles than expected compared to other predicted consequence types. A small subset of low-prevalence variants with intermediate allele frequencies and higher FST were detected as significantly associated to the production traits and explained small fractions of phenotypic variance (up to 3.2%). These associations were tagged by other more widespread variants, including intergenic variants. ConclusionsMost low-prevalence variants are kept at very low allele frequency and only a small subset contributed detectable fractions of phenotypic variance. Not accounting for low-prevalence variants is therefore unlikely to hinder across-breed analyses, in particular for genomic prediction of breeding values using reference populations of a different genetic background.

genomics↗

Including phenotypic causal networks in genome-wide association studies using mixed effects structural equation models

BackgroundPhenotypic networks describing putative causal relationships among multiple phenotypes can be used to infer single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In GWAS with multiple phenotypes, reconstructing underlying causal structures among traits and SNPs using a single statistical framework is essential for understanding the entirety of genotype-phenotype maps. A structural equation model (SEM) can be used for such purposes.\n\nMethodsWe applied SEM to GWAS (SEM-GWAS) in chickens, taking into account putative causal relationships among body weight (BW), breast meat (BM), hen-house production (HHP), and SNPs. We assessed the performance of SEM-GWAS by comparing the model results with those obtained from traditional multi-trait association analyses (MTM-GWAS).\n\nResultsThree different putative causal path diagrams were inferred from highest posterior density (HPD) intervals of 0.75, 0.85, and 0.95 using the inductive causation algorithm. A positive path coefficient was estimated for BM[->]BW, and negative values were obtained for BM[->]HHP and BW[->]HHP in all implemented scenarios. Further, the application of SEM-GWAS enabled the decomposition of SNP effects into direct, indirect, and total effects, identifying whether a SNP effect is acting directly or indirectly on a given trait. In contrast, MTM-GWAS only captured overall genetic effects on traits, which is equivalent to combining the direct and indirect SNP effects from SEMGWAS.\n\nConclusionsAlthough MTM-GWAS and SEM-GWAS use the same probabilistic models, we provide evidence that SEM-GWAS captures complex relationships and delivers a more comprehensive understanding of SNP effects compared to MTM-GWAS. Our results showed that SEM-GWAS provides important insight regarding the mechanism by which identified SNPs control traits by partitioning them into direct, indirect, and total SNP effects.

genetics↗