Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Vaidya, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Vaidya, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Shared and distinct neural signatures of inhibitory control deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism

BackgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) share deficits in inhibitory control, yet direct comparisons of their neurobiological underpinnings remain sparse and are often confounded by comorbidity. We examined shared and distinct abnormalities in brain activation and circuit connectivity associated with inhibitory control in non-comorbid ADHD and ASD. MethodsBrain activity and hyperdirect pathway connectivity during inhibitory control were examined in children with non-comorbid ADHD (age: 11.1{+/-}0.24y) and children with non-comorbid ASD (age: 11.1{+/-}0.39y), compared with typically developing (TD) children (age: 10.9{+/-}0.09y), and benchmarked against healthy adults (age: 24.1{+/-}1.26y), using fMRI stop-signal task data. ResultsBoth ADHD and ASD groups showed reduced activation in salience and frontoparietal network regions alongside increased activation in default mode network (DMN) regions, consistent with triple-network dysfunction. These activation deficits were more pronounced in ASD, whose activation profile also diverged most from adults. At the circuit level, only ASD showed abnormal hyperdirect connectivity, involving insula-STN and preSMA-STN pathways and further reflected in a composite insula/IFG-STN connectivity measure, indicating broader cortical-STN disruption. Importantly, across all children, reduced salience/frontoparietal relative to DMN engagement correlated with greater parent-reported inhibitory control deficits, and in ASD, individual differences in insula/IFG-STN connectivity showed the same association, highlighting the behavioral relevance of both network- and circuit-level abnormalities. ConclusionsADHD and ASD share network-level but differ in circuit-level abnormalities underlying inhibitory control deficits. Together, these insights advance the neurobiology of inhibitory control in ADHD and ASD and provide potential targets for neuroscience-informed interventions addressing both shared and disorder-specific mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

Complex interspecific interactions influence the interactions between pest control and pollination in coffee agroecosystems.

Ecosystem services mediated by biodiversity are essential for the well-being of human beings. While there is ample research on individual ecosystem services (such as pollination, nutrient cycling), there is now growing recognition to examine the interactions between multiple ecosystem services and their contribution to productivity in order to manage agroecosystems sustainably. In this study, we examined the interactions between pollination and pest control in coffee agroecosystems in Chiapas, Mexico. We tested how management of shade trees, particularly of nitrogen-fixing shade trees, at the farm scale mediated the outcome of the interactions between two ES. We found that there was no trade-off between pest control and pollination services despite the deterrence of pollinators by the dominant and aggressive ant species, Azteca sericeasur, which also controls the coffee berry borer, a major pest of Coffea arabica. We found additive effects of pest-control and pollination on early fruit set and fruit weight of coffee plants. Proximity to nitrogen-fixing shade trees had indirect effects on pest-control via the reduction of Azteca sericeasur activity on the coffee bushes. These findings highlight that ecosystem services are a result of complex interspecific interactions and that biodiversity-friendly management practices can promote favorable outcomes of these interactions on coffee yield.

ecology↗