Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Upton, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Upton, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A prioritization strategy for protecting Conservation Imperatives Sites

To prevent species extinctions, targeted action must focus on areas of threatened biodiversity facing intense human pressures. This objective is even more important in the run-up to 2030, the target date to conserve 30% of lands and waters globally. Conservation Imperatives (unprotected terrestrial sites that harbour rare, range-restricted, and threatened species) are critical to preventing imminent species losses. To prioritize among the 16,825 Conservation Imperatives Sites spanning 1.64 million km2, we ranked each site using a prioritization framework based on four criteria: number of threatened species per site; irreplaceability of the site; the proportion of an ecoregions remaining habitat contained in the site; and conversion pressure. Our approach prioritizes 1,667 sites representing 501,426 km2, or 0.37% of Earths terrestrial surface, most in need of urgent protection, with 87.34% of these sites occurring in 20 countries and in 250 ecoregions. This prioritization directly addresses the concern that protected areas must be targeted to protect endangered species, habitats and populations: 33.46% of the prioritized Conservation Imperatives Sites scored higher in irreplaceability than 90% of existing protected areas. Additionally, 51.53% are within 2.5 km2 of an existing protected area, making extending protection or restoring connectivity more feasible. Targeting conservation actions, especially in this small set of countries and ecoregions identified here, would contribute "high quality" areas for biodiversity as part of reaching the 30% coverage target by 2030.

ecology↗

Poor protection of amphibian evolutionary history reveals opportunities for global protected areas

As habitat loss is a major driver of amphibian population declines, protected areas (PAs) can play a crucial role in amphibian conservation. Documenting how well the global PA network captures the evolutionary history of amphibians can inform conservation prioritisation and action. We conducted a phylogenetic gap analysis to assess the extent to which amphibian phylogenetic diversity (PD) is unprotected by the PA network and compared this to other terrestrial vertebrate groups. 78% of amphibian species and 64% of global amphibian PD remains unprotected, which is higher than corresponding figures for squamates, mammals and birds. Amongst amphibians, salamanders were the least well protected, with 78% of PD unprotected, compared with 64% for caecilians and 63% for frogs. We identify areas that offer the greatest opportunity to capture unprotected amphibian evolutionary history. We could capture an additional 29.4% of amphibian PD, representing 40 billion years of evolutionary history, by protecting an additional 1.9% of global amphibian distributions (1.74% of global land area) and increasing the restrictions in 0.6% of amphibian distributions to match the management objectives of PAs in IUCN categories I or II. Importantly, we found that the spatial distribution of unprotected PD was correlated across all groups, indicating that expanding the PA network to conserve amphibian PD can secure imperilled vertebrate diversity more generally.

evolutionary biology↗