Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Umarova, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Umarova, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Benchmarking Stroke Outcome Prediction through Comprehensive Data Analysis - NeuralCup 2023

Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with variable recovery trajectories posing substantial challenges in anticipating post-event care and rehabilitation planning. To address these challenges, we established the NeuralCup consortium to benchmark predictive models of stroke outcome through a collaborative, data-driven approach. This study presents findings from 15 international teams who used a comprehensive dataset including clinical and imaging data, to identify and compare predictors of motor, cognitive, and emotional outcomes one year post-stroke. Our analyses integrated traditional statistical approaches and novel machine learning algorithms to uncover optimal recipes for predicting each domain. The differences in these optimal recipes reflect distinct brain mechanisms in response to different tasks. Key predictors across all domains included infarct characteristics, T1-weighted MRI sequences, and demographic factors. Additionally, integrating FLAIR imaging and white matter tract analysis significantly improved the prediction of cognitive and motor outcomes, respectively. These findings support a multifaceted approach to stroke outcome prediction, underscoring the potential of collaborative data science to develop personalized care strategies that enhance recovery and quality of life for stroke survivors. To encourage further model development and validation, we provide access to the training dataset at http://neuralcup.bcblab.com

neuroscience↗

Control without cause: How covariate control biases our insights into brain architecture and pathology

Inferential analysis of normal or pathological brain imaging data - as in brain mapping or the identification of neurological imaging markers - is often controlled for secondary variables. However, a rationale for covariate control is rarely given and formal criteria to identify appropriate covariates in such complex data are lacking. We investigated the impact and adequacy of covariate control in large-scale imaging data using the example of stroke lesion-deficit mapping. In 183 stroke patients, we evaluated control for age, sex, hypertension, or lesion volume when mapping real or simulated deficits. We found that the impact of covariate control varies and can be strong, but it does not necessarily improve the precision of results. Instead, it systematically shifts results towards the inversed associations between imaging features and the covariate. This effect of covariate control can bias results and, as shown in another experiment, can even create effects out of nothing. The widespread use of covariate control in the statistical analysis of clinical brain imaging data - and, likely, other biological high-dimensional data as well - may not generally improve statistical results, but it may just change them. Therefore, covariate control constitutes a problematic degree of freedom in the analysis of brain imaging data and may often not be justified at all.

neuroscience↗