Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Twomey, C. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Twomey, C. R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Both Prey and Predator Features Determine Predation Risk and Survival of Schooling Prey

Predation is one of the main evolutionary drivers of social grouping. While it is well appreciated that predation risk is likely not shared equally among individuals within groups, its detailed quantification has remained difficult due to the speed of attacks and the highly-dynamic nature of collective prey response. Here, using high-resolution tracking of solitary predators (Northern pike) hunting schooling fish (golden shiners), we not only provide detailed insights into predator decision-making but show which key spatial and kinematic features of predator and prey influence individuals risk to be targeted and survive attacks. Pike tended to stealthily approach the largest groups, and were often already inside the school when launching their attack, making prey in this frontal "strike zone" the most vulnerable to be targeted. From the preys perspective, those fish in central locations, but relatively far from, and less aligned with, neighbours, were most likely to be targeted. While the majority of attacks (70%) were successful, targeted individuals that did manage to avoid capture exhibited a higher maximum acceleration response just before the attack and were further away from the pike s head. Our results highlight the crucial interplay between predators attack strategy and response of prey in determining predation risk in mobile animal groups.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Collective detection based on visual information in animal groups

The spatio-temporal distribution of individuals within a group (i.e its internal structure) plays a defining role in how individuals interact with their environment, make decisions, and transmit information via social interactions. Group-living organisms across taxa, including many species of fish, birds, ungulates, and insects, use vision as the predominant modality to coordinate their collective behavior. Despite this importance, there have been few quantitative studies examining visual detection capabilities of individuals within groups. We investigate key principles underlying individual, and collective, visual detection of stimuli (which could include cryptic predators, potential food items, etc.) and how this relates to the internal structure of groups. While the individual and collective detection principles are generally applicable, we employ a model experimental system of schooling golden shiner fish (Notemigonus crysoleucas) to relate theory directly to empirical data, using computational reconstruction of the visual fields of all individuals to do so. Our integrative approach allows us to reveal how the external visual information available to each group member depends on the number of individuals in the group, the position within the group, and the location of the external visually-detectable stimulus. We find that in small groups, individuals have detection capability in nearly all directions, while in large groups, occlusion by neighbors causes detection capability to vary with position within the group. We then formulate a simple, and generally applicable, model that captures how visual detection properties emerge due to geometric scaling of the space occupied by the group and occlusion caused by neighbors. We employ these insights to discuss principles that extend beyond our specific system, such as how collective detection depends on individual body shape, and the size and structure of the group.

animal behavior and cognition↗

What we talk about when we talk about color

Names for colors vary widely across languages, but color categories are remarkably consistent (Berlin & Kay, 1969). Shared mechanisms of color perception help explain consistent partitions of visible light into discrete color vocabularies (Regier et al., 2007). But the mappings from colors to words are not identical across languages, which may reflect communicative needs - how often speakers must refer to objects of different color (Gibson et al., 2017). Here we quantify the communicative needs of colors in 130 different languages by means of a novel inference algorithm. We find that communicative needs are not uniform: some regions of color space exhibit 30-fold greater demand for communication than other regions. The regions of greatest demand correlate with the colors of salient objects, including ripe fruits in primate diets. Our analysis also reveals a hidden diversity in the communicative needs of colors across different languages, which is partly explained by differences in geographic location and the local biogeography of linguistic communities. Accounting for language-specific, non-uniform communicative needs improves predictions for how a language maps colors to words, and how these mappings vary across languages. Our account closes an important gap in the compression theory of color naming, while opening new directions to study cross-cultural variation in the need to communicate different colors and its impact on the cultural evolution of color categories.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Searching for structure in collective systems

Collective systems such as fish schools, bird flocks, and neural networks are comprised of many mutually-influencing individuals, often without long-term leaders, well-defined hierarchies, or persistent relationships. The remarkably organized group-level behaviors readily observable in these systems contrast with the ad hoc, often difficult to observe, and complex interactions among their constituents. While these complex individual-level dynamics are ultimately the drivers of group-level coordination, they do not necessarily offer the most parsimonious description of a groups macroscopic properties. Rather, the factors underlying group organization may be better described at some intermediate, mesoscopic scale. We introduce a novel method from information-theoretic first principles to find a compressed description of a system based on the actions and mutual dependencies of its constituents, thus revealing the natural structure of the collective. We emphasize that this method is computationally tractable and requires neither pairwise nor Gaussian assumptions about individual interactions.

animal behavior and cognition↗