Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Turegano-Lopez, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Turegano-Lopez, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Volume Electron Microscopy of Cortical Organoids: Methods for Region Identification, Connectome Reconstruction, and Organelle Segmentation

Volume electron microscopy (vEM) has become a powerful tool for 3D ultrastructural analysis of neural circuits, yet its application to human brain organoids remains limited, particularly for connectomic studies. Here, we established a comprehensive and scalable workflow for applying vEM to human cortical organoids, integrating correlative light and electron microscopy, large-area SEM mosaic imaging, focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) validation. By systematically comparing two embedding protocols in use, we demonstrated that the DeFelipe and Fairen (1993)/Cano-Astorga et al. (2024) method provides optimal compatibility with toluidine blue-stained semithin sectioning and enables reliable synapse segmentation and neurite tracing. In contrast, the Deerinck et al. (2010) protocol offers enhanced membrane contrast but limits postsynaptic density visualization. Using FIB-SEM imaging of peripheral, neuropil-like regions of cortical organoids, we achieved accurate 3D reconstruction of synapses, neurites and intracellular organelles, enabling quantitative assessment of synaptic apposition surfaces, neurite trajectories, and organelle distribution across defined cellular compartments. Together, our results demonstrate for the first time the feasibility of micro-connectomic reconstruction in human cortical organoids at nanometer resolution. This methodological framework expands the applicability of vEM to organoid systems and provides a robust foundation for future studies of human brain development, disease modeling, and therapeutic evaluation at the synaptic and subcellular level.

neuroscience↗

Nanoconnectivity: a quantitative approach to examine the structural complexity of the brain

Unraveling the highly complex connectivity at the synaptic level is critical for the understanding of brain function. However, investigating the structure of the brain is time consuming and technically demanding. We have developed and applied a tracing method that allows us to obtain a simplified or skeletonized version of all nerve fibers present within a given brain sample, without the need for full 3D reconstructions. Every tracing or "skeleton" is linked to its corresponding synaptic contacts, so the result is an intricate meshwork of axons and dendrites interconnected by a cloud of synaptic junctions. The tissue sample is obtained by volume electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) and tracing is performed by dedicated software. In addition, the software provides the length of each skeleton as well as the number and positions of its corresponding synapses. With this approach, we have identified clear as well as subtle quantitative differences between three brain regions (the stratum radiatum of the hippocampus and layers 1 and 3 of the somatosensory cortex). For example, we have found that axons and dendrites are densely packed in the neuropil of these three regions, reaching close to 8 kilometers of nerve fibers per cubic mm in layer 1. In all cases, the predominant fibers were excitatory axons, followed by spiny dendrites, inhibitory axons and smooth dendrites. Other examples include the fact that the excitatory axons in the stratum radiatum establish many more synapses per micron than the axons of the other regions, or the lack of correlation between the number of synapses established on the spines of a given dendrite and the number of synapses established on the dendritic shaft. Using this methodology, we obtain a set of quantitative parameters including the number and proportions of excitatory and inhibitory synapses; the numbers of dendrites and axons; the proportion of excitatory and inhibitory axons; the linear densities of synapses established on dendritic spines and dendritic shafts; the linear densities of synapses established by excitatory and inhibitory axons; and the lengths of the different types of dendrites and axons. Taken together, these data characterize each region, allowing us to compare them on a quantitative basis and to identify subtle traits and differences that would have escaped a qualitative analysis. With this strategy, we can achieve a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of the brain, and we are better equipped to explore how they change during both normal and pathological conditions.

neuroscience↗