Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tura, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Tura, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Protein profiling of WERI RB1 and etoposide resistant WERI ETOR reveals new insights into topoisomerase inhibitor resistance in retinoblastoma

Chemotherapy resistance is one of the reasons for eye loss in patients with retinoblastoma (RB). RB chemotherapy resistance has been studied in different cell culture models such as WERI RB1. In addition, chemotherapy resistant RB subclones like the etoposide resistant WERI ETOR cell line have been established to improve the understanding of chemotherapy resistance in RB. The objective of this study was to characterize cell line models of an etoposide sensitive WERI RB1 and its etoposide resistant subclone WERI ETOR by proteomic analysis. Subsequently, quantitative proteomic data served for correlation analysis with known drug perturbation profiles. Methodically, WERI RB1 and WERI ETOR were cultured and prepared for quantitative mass spectrometry (MS). This was carried out in a data-independent acquisition (DIA) mode (Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra, SWATH-MS). The raw SWATH files were processed using neural networks in a library free mode along with machine learning algorithms. Pathway enrichment was performed using the REACTOME pathway resource and correlated to the Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collections for functional annotation. Furthermore, a drug connectivity analysis using the L1000 database was used to correlate the mechanism-of-action (MOA) for different anticancer reagents to WERI RB1/WERI ETOR signatures. A total of 4,756 proteins were identified across all samples, showing a distinct clustering between the groups. Of these proteins, 64 were significantly altered (q < 0.05 & log2FC |>2|, 22% higher in WERI ETOR). Pathway analysis revealed an enriched metabolic pathway for "retinoid metabolism and transport" in WERI ETOR and for "sphingolipid de novo biosynthesis" in WERI RB1. In addition, this study revealed similar protein signatures of topoisomerase inhibitors in WERI ETOR as well as ATPase inhibitors, acetylcholine receptor antagonists and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors in WERI RB1. In this study, WERI RB1 and WERI ETOR were analyzed as a cell line model for chemotherapy resistance in RB using data-independent MS. The global proteome identified activation of "sphingolipid de novo biosynthesis" in WERI RB1 and revealed future potential treatment options for etoposide resistance in RB.

cancer biology↗

Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium

Abstract/SummaryO_ST_ABSBackground and aimsC_ST_ABSUnderstanding the aetiology, clinical presentation and prognosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and optimizing its treatment might be facilitated by biomarkers that help predict a persons susceptibility to the risk factors that cause diabetes or its complications, or response to treatment. The IMI DIRECT (Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification) Study is a European Union (EU) Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) project that seeks to test these hypotheses in two recently established epidemiological cohorts. Here, we describe the characteristics of these cohorts at baseline and at the first main follow-up examination (18-months).\n\nMaterials and methodsFrom a sampling-frame of 24,682 European-ancestry adults in whom detailed health information was available, participants at varying risk of glycaemic deterioration were identified using a risk prediction algorithm and enrolled into a prospective cohort study (n=2127) undertaken at four study centres across Europe (Cohort 1: prediabetes). We also recruited people from clinical registries with recently diagnosed T2D (n=789) into a second cohort study (Cohort 2: diabetes). The two cohorts were studied in parallel with matched protocols. Endogenous insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity were modelled from frequently sampled 75g oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) in Cohort 1 and with mixed-meal tolerance tests (MMTT) in Cohort 2. Additional metabolic biochemistry was determined using blood samples taken when fasted and during the tolerance tests. Body composition was assessed using MRI and lifestyle measures through self-report and objective methods.\n\nResultsUsing ADA-2011 glycaemic categories, 33% (n=693) of Cohort 1 (prediabetes) had normal glucose regulation (NGR), and 67% (n=1419) had impaired glucose regulation (IGR). 76% of the cohort was male, age=62(6.2) years; BMI=27.9(4.0) kg/m2; fasting glucose=5.7(0.6) mmol/l; 2-hr glucose=5.9(1.6) mmol/l [mean(SD)]. At follow-up, 18.6(1.4) months after baseline, fasting glucose=5.8(0.6) mmol/l; 2-hr OGTT glucose=6.1(1.7) mmol/l [mean(SD)]. In Cohort 2 (diabetes): 65% (n=508) were lifestyle treated (LS) and 35% (n=271) were lifestyle + metformin treated (LS+MET). 58% of the cohort was male, age=62(8.1) years; BMI=30.5(5.0) kg/m2; fasting glucose=7.2(1.4)mmol/l; 2-hr glucose=8.6(2.8) mmol/l [mean(SD)]. At follow-up, 18.2(0.6) months after baseline, fasting glucose=7.8(1.8) mmol/l; 2-hr MMTT glucose=9.5(3.3) mmol/l [mean(SD)].\n\nConclusionThe epidemiological IMI DIRECT cohorts are the most intensely characterised prospective studies of glycaemic deterioration to date. Data from these cohorts help illustrate the heterogeneous characteristics of people at risk of or with T2D, highlighting the rationale for biomarker stratification of the disease - the primary objective of the IMI DIRECT consortium.\n\nAbbreviations

epidemiology↗