Biology subjects

Tsishyn, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Tsishyn, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Residue conservation and solvent accessibility are (almost) all you need for predicting mutational effects in proteins

MotivationPredicting how mutations impact protein biophysical properties remains a significant challenge in computational biology. In recent years, numerous predictors, primarily deep learning models, have been developed to address this problem; however, issues such as their lack of interpretability and limited accuracy persist. ResultsWe showed that a simple evolutionary score, based on the log-odd ratio (LOR) of wild-type and mutated residue frequencies in evolutionary related proteins, when scaled by the residues relative solvent accessibility (RSA), performs on par with or slightly outperforms most of the benchmarked predictors, many of which are considerably more complex. The evaluation is performed on mutations from the ProteinGym deep mutational scanning dataset collection, which measures various properties such as stability, activity or fitness. This raises further questions about what these complex models actually learn and highlights their limitations in addressing prediction of mutational landscape. AvailabilityThe RSALOR model is available as a user-friendly Python package that can be installed from the PyPI repository. The code is freely available at https://github.com/3BioCompBio/RSALOR. Contactmatsvei.tsishyn@ulb.be, fabrizio.pucci@ulb.be

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

Exploring evolution to enhance mutational stability prediction

Determining the impact of mutations on the thermodynamic stability of proteins is essential for a wide range of applications such as rational protein design and genetic variant interpretation. Since protein stability is a major driver of evolution, evolutionary data are often used to guide stability predictions. Many state-of-the-art stability predictors extract evolutionary information from multiple sequence alignments (MSA) of proteins homologous to a query protein, and leverage it to predict the effects of mutations on protein stability. To evaluate the power and the limitations of such methods, we used the massive amount of stability data recently obtained by deep mutational scanning to study how best to construct MSAs and optimally extract evolutionary information from them. We tested different evolutionary models and found that, unexpectedly, independent-site models achieve similar accuracy to more complex epistatic models. A detailed analysis of the latter models suggests that their inference often results in noisy couplings, which do not appear to add predictive power over the independent-site contribution, at least in the context of stability prediction. Interestingly, by combining any of the evolutionary features with a simple structural feature, the relative solvent accessibility of the mutated residue, we achieved similar prediction accuracy to supervised, machine learning-based, protein stability change predictors. Our results provide new insights into the relationship between protein evolution and stability, and show how evolutionary information can be exploited to improve the performance of mutational stability prediction.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Quantification of biases in predictions of protein-protein binding affinity changes upon mutations

Understanding the impact of mutations on protein-protein binding affinity is a key objective for a wide range of biotechnological applications and for shedding light on disease-causing mutations, which are often located at protein-protein interfaces. Over the past decade, many computational methods using physics-based and/or machine learning approaches have been developed to predict how protein binding affinity changes upon mutations. They all claim to achieve astonishing accuracy on both training and test sets, with performances on standard benchmarks such as SKEMPI 2.0 that seem overly optimistic. Here we benchmarked eight well-known and well-used predictors and identified their biases and dataset dependencies, using not only SKEMPI 2.0 as a test set but also deep mutagenesis data on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in complex with the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. We showed that, even though most of the tested methods reach a significant degree of robustness and accuracy, they suffer from limited generalizability properties and struggle to predict unseen mutations. Interestingly, the generalizability problems are more severe for pure machine learning approaches while physics-based methods are less affected by this issue. Moreover, undesirable prediction biases towards specific mutation properties, the most marked being towards destabilizing mutations, are also observed and should be carefully considered by method developers. We conclude from our analyses that there is room for improvement in the prediction models and suggest ways to check, assess and improve their generalizability and robustness.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

FiTMuSiC: Leveraging structural and (co)evolutionary data for protein fitness prediction

Systematically predicting the effects of mutations on protein fitness is essential for the understanding of genetic diseases. Indeed, predictions complement experimental efforts in analyzing how variants lead to dysfunctional proteins that in turn can cause diseases. Here we present our new fitness predictor, FiTMuSiC, which leverages structural, evolutionary and coevolutionary information. We show that FiTMuSiC predicts fitness with high accuracy despite the simplicity of its underlying model: it was one of the top predictors on the hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) target of the sixth round of the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation challenge (CAGI6). To further demonstrate FiTMuSiCs robustness, we compared its predictions with in vitro activity data on HMBS, variant fitness data on human glucokinase (GCK), and variant deleteriousness data on HMBS and GCK. These analyses further confirm FiTMuSiCs qualities and accuracy, which compare favorably with those of other predictors. Additionally, FiTMuSiC returns two scores that separately describe the functional and structural effects of the variant, thus providing mechanistic insight into why the variant leads to fitness loss or gain. We also provide an easy-to-use webserver at http://babylone.ulb.ac.be/FiTMuSiC/, which is freely available for academic use and does not require any bioinformatics expertise, which simplifies the accessibility of our tool for the entire scientific community.

bioinformatics↗