Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Truong, D. Q.

Publications and source records attributed to Truong, D. Q..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Model-based assessment of race, sex, and electrode montage in ECT

Objective: This computational modeling study quantified the influence of sex and race-related cranial anatomy on predicted brain-wide current flow during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) across conventional (bifrontal (BF), bitemporal/bilateral (BL), right unilateral (RUL)) and experimental (focal electrically administered seizure therapy (FEAST) and frontomedial (FM)) electrode montages. The objective was to determine whether race-associated variability meaningfully contributes to differences in ECT stimulation metrics across montages. Methods: Finite element head models of Chinese, Black, and Caucasian subjects were developed using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and analyzed using the Realistic vOlumetric- Approach-based Stimulator for Transcranial electric stimulation (ROAST) pipeline (N = 150 total; n = 50 per cohort, comprising 25 M and 25 F, age range: 20-30 years). Five ECT montages were simulated under a constant-current condition (900mA). Stimulation strength (Ebrain/Eth) was quantified as 90th percentile of brain-wide E-field magnitude (Ebrain) relative to neuronal activation threshold (Eth = 0.25 V/cm) quantified stimulation strength. Overall focality was evaluated as a percentage of brain volume stimulated above the neural activation threshold (Ebrain [≥] Eth), while laterality was quantified as the median right-to-left hemispheric E-field magnitude ratio. The effects of race, sex, and montage on stimulation strength, focality, and hemispheric laterality were statistically analyzed. Results: Substantial race- and sex-related differences observed in cranial anatomy resulted in systematic variation in predicted ECT-induced E-field intensity. Brain-wide E-field magnitude varied by both race and montage, with the largest fields generally observed in Caucasian head models and during BL stimulation. Montage exerted the strongest effect on stimulation strength (Ebrain/Eth) with BL and FEAST producing the highest stimulation strengths, followed by RUL and FM, while BF produced the lowest. Caucasian subjects generally predicted higher stimulation strengths than Black and Chinese subjects, whereas females predicted modestly higher stimulation strengths than males. Laterality was primarily determined by montage, with FEAST producing the greatest hemispheric asymmetry, followed by RUL. Chinese subjects demonstrated higher laterality ratios than both Black and Caucasian subjects. BL, RUL, and FEAST stimulated substantially larger brain volumes above neural activation threshold (less focal stimulation) than BF. Lower focality was observed in Caucasian subjects relative to Black and Chinese subjects, and in females relative to males. Conclusions: Electrode montage was the primary determinant of predicted ECT stimulation strength, focality, and laterality. Race-related anatomical differences and, to a lesser extent, sex-related differences systematically altered stimulation patterns, supporting consideration of individualized anatomy in ECT dosing and treatment optimization.

neuroscience↗

Assessing suitability of ultra-low-field MRI for TES electric field models

ObjectiveRecent ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI systems provide an option for more accessible and cost-effective imaging to widely used higher field (HF, usually 3T) systems. However, it remains uncertain whether ULF scans can be used for reliable TES current-flow modeling as opposed to using 3T MRI. MethodsWe used raw anatomical scans of 23 healthy adults from 64 mT and 3T systems. We enhanced the 64 mT scans using SynthSR. Using our established current-flow modeling pipeline we determined the electric fields (EF) for the ULF and 3T scans induced by the classic M1-SO electrode montage. We quantified the differences in EF at three regions of interest (ROI): left motor cortex (LMC), anterior commissure (AC), and left hippocampus (LHC). ResultsAt the cortical ROI (LMC), the individual mean EF based on a 3T scan was found to be 27% higher than the corresponding ULF scan. The average mean relative error was found to be 40%. At AC, the individual mean EF based on a 3T scan continued to be elevated by about 13% in magnitude with respect to the corresponding ULF scan with a mean error range of 31-34%. At LHC, comparison of the induced individual mean EF magnitudes indicated no clear bias between 3T-based and ULF-based models. The average mean relative error at this level dropped to [~]20%. DiscussionThe substantial decrease in cortical EF when using an ULF scan is predominantly explained by the overestimation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) noted by prior morphological comparison studies. Scaling up EF magnitude to match predicted cortical values to a 3T scan may be considered depending on the modeling question being addressed. While preliminary, our results suggest an "equalizing" effect between ULF and 3T predictions with increasing depth within the brain.

bioengineering↗

Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter?

BackgroundGalvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) uses at least one electrode placed on the mastoid process with one or multiple placed over other head areas to stimulate the vestibular system. The exact electrode size used is not given much importance in the literature and has not been reported in several studies. In a previous study, we compared the clinical effects of using different electrode sizes (3 cm2 and 35 cm2) with placebo but with the same injected current, on postural control. We observed significant improvement using the smaller size electrode but not with the bigger size electrode. The goal of this study was to simulate the current flow patterns with the intent to shed light and potentially explain the experimental outcome. MethodsWe used an ultra-high-resolution structural dataset and developed a model to simulate the application of different electrode sizes. We considered current flow in the brain and in the vestibular labyrinth. ResultsOur simulation results verified the focality increase using smaller electrodes that we postulated as the main reason for our clinical effect. The use of smaller size electrodes in combination with the montage employed also result in higher induced electric field (E-field) in the brain. ConclusionsElectrode size and related current density is a critical parameter to characterize any GVS administration as the choice impacts the induced E-field. It is evident that the higher induced E-field likely contributed to the clinical outcome reported in our prior study.

bioengineering↗

Computational Finite Element Method (FEM) forward modeling workflow for transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) current flow on MRI-derived head: Simpleware and COMSOL Multiphysics tutorial

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) dose designs are often based on computational Finite Element Method (FEM) forward modeling studies. These FEM models educate researchers about the resulting current flow (intensity and pattern) and so the resulting neurophysiological and behavioral changes based on tDCS dose (mA), resistivity of head tissues (e.g. skin, skull, CSF, brain), and head anatomy. Moreover, model support optimization of montage to target specific brain regions. Computational models are thus an ancillary tool used to inform the design, set-up and programming of tDCS devices, and investigate the role of parameters such as electrode assembly, current directionality, and polarity of tDCS in optimizing therapeutic interventions. Computational FEM modeling pipeline of tDCS initiates with segmentation of an exemplary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of a template head into multiple tissue compartments to develop a higher resolution (< 1 mm) MRI derived FEM model using Simpleware ScanIP. Next, electrode assembly (anode and cathode of variant dimension) is positioned over the brain target and meshed at different mesh densities. Finally, a volumetric mesh of the head with electrodes is imported in COMSOL and a quasistatic approximation (stead-state solution method) is implemented with boundary conditions such as inward normal current density (anode), ground (cathode), and electrically insulating remaining boundaries. A successfully solved FEM model is used to visualize the model prediction via different plots (streamlines, volume plot, arrow plot).

neuroscience↗