Biology subjects

Trummer, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Trummer, N..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Detection of Candidate Circular RNAs to Monitor Anti-Hormonal Response in the Mammary Gland

Anti-hormonal therapies such as selective estrogen receptor modulators like tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors like letrozole represent a cornerstone for breast cancer prevention and therapy of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Therapeutic monitoring can include blood tests and imaging; however, genetically-based approaches are not yet in practice. Ideally, a test would be able to detect a positive molecular response across different estrogen pathway-suppressive approaches. Circular RNAs are a species of non-coding RNAs detectable in plasma that have been proposed as non-invasive therapeutic biomarkers. To determine whether a set of specific circular RNAs is altered across estrogen-suppressive pathway approaches, we analyzed mammary gland-specific total RNA sequencing data from two individual genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of estrogen pathway-induced breast cancer, with or without exposure to tamoxifen or letrozole. The nf-core/circrna pipeline was used to identify circRNAs that were differentially expressed in response to either tamoxifen or letrozole. We then screened for circRNAs that were differentially regulated by both anti-hormonals. Four up-regulated and 31 down-regulated circRNAs with host genes known to be expressed in human breast epithelial cells were identified as showing reproducible differential regulation in response to anti-hormonal treatment.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2026

Common Pitfalls in CircRNA Detection and Quantification

1Circular RNAs have garnered considerable interest, as they have been implicated in numerous biological processes and diseases. Through their stability, they are often considered promising biomarker candidates or therapeutic targets. Due to the lack of a poly(A) tail, circRNAs are best detected in total RNA-seq data after depleting ribosomal RNA. However, we observe that the application of circRNA detection in the vastly more ubiquitous poly(A)-enriched RNA-seq data still occurs. In this study, we systematically compare the detection of circRNAs in two matched poly(A) and ribosomal RNA-depleted data sets. Our results indicate that the comparably few circRNAs detected in poly(A) data are likely false positives. In addition, we demonstrate that the quality of sample processing, as measured by the fraction of ribosomal reads, significantly affects the sensitivity of circRNA detection, leading to a bias in downstream analysis. Our findings establish best practices for circRNA research: total RNA sequencing with effective rRNA depletion is the preferred approach for accurate circRNA profiling, whereas poly(A)-enriched data are unsuitable for comprehensive detection. Employing multiple circRNA detection tools and prioritizing back-splice junctions identified by several algorithms enhances confidence in the selection of candidates. These recommendations, validated across diverse datasets and tissue types, provide generalizable principles for robust circRNA analysis. Key PointsO_LIRibosomal RNA contamination substantially impairs the accuracy of circRNA detection. This technical confounding factor has thus far received limited attention in the field. C_LIO_LITool agreement for circRNA calls is moderate in total RNA-seq but essentially absent in poly(A)-enriched RNA-seq data, underscoring the importance of using multiple tools for circRNA detection. C_LIO_LIBack-splice junctions detected in poly(A)-enriched RNA-seq data are predominantly tool-specific artifacts rather than genuine circRNAs, challenging the validity of circRNA identification in poly(A)-enriched datasets. C_LI

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Blood transcriptomics analysis offers insights into variant-specific immune response to SARS-CoV-2

Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of blood is typically used for gene expression analysis in biomedical research but is still rarely used in clinical practice. In this study, we argue that RNA-seq should be considered a routine diagnostic tool, as it offers not only insights into aberrant gene expression and splicing but also delivers additional readouts on immune cell type composition as well as B-cell and T-cell receptor (BCR/TCR) repertoires. We demonstrate that RNA-seq offers vital insights into a patients immune status via integrative analysis of RNA-seq data from patients infected with various SARS-CoV-2 variants (in total 240 samples with up to 200 million reads sequencing depth). We compare the results of computational cell-type deconvolution methods (e.g., MCP-counter, xCell, EPIC, quanTIseq) to complete blood count data, the current gold standard in clinical practice. We observe varying levels of lymphocyte depletion and significant differences in neutrophil levels between SARS-CoV-2 variants. Additionally, we identify B and T cell receptor (BCR/TCR) sequences using the tools MiXCR and TRUST4 to show that - combined with sequence alignments and pBLAST - they could be used to classify a patients disease. Finally, we investigated the sequencing depth required for such analyses and concluded that 10 million reads per sample is sufficient. In conclusion, our study reveals that computational cell-type deconvolution and BCR/TCR methods using bulk RNA-seq analyses can supplement missing CBC data and offer insights into immune responses, disease severity, and pathogen-specific immunity, all achievable with a sequencing depth of 10 million reads per sample. Key PointsO_LIComputational deconvolution of transcriptomes can estimate immune cell abundances in SARS-CoV-2 patients, supplementing missing CBC data. C_LIO_LI10 million RNA sequencing reads per sample suffice for analyzing immune responses and disease severity, including BCR/TCR identification. C_LI

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

circRNA-sponging: a pipeline for extensive analysis of circRNA expression and their role in miRNA sponging

MotivationCircular RNAs (circRNAs) are long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) often associated with diseases and considered potential biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment. Among other functions, circRNAs have been shown to act as microRNA (miRNA) sponges, preventing the role of miRNAs that repress their targets. However, there is no pipeline to systematically assess the sponging potential of circRNAs. ResultsWe developed circRNA-sponging, a nextflow pipeline that (1) identifies circRNAs via backsplicing junctions detected in RNA-seq data, (2) quantifies their expression values in relation to their linear counterparts spliced from the same gene, (3) performs differential expression analysis, (4) identifies and quantifies miRNA expression from miRNA-sequencing (miRNA-seq) data, (5) predicts miRNA binding sites on circRNAs, (6) systematically investigates potential circRNA-miRNA sponging events, (7) creates a network of competing endogenous RNAs, and (8) identifies potential circRNA biomarkers. We showed the functionality of the circRNA-sponging pipeline using RNA sequencing data from brain tissues, where we identified two distinct types of circRNAs characterized by a specific ratio of the number of the binding site to the length of the transcript. The circRNA-sponging pipeline is the first end-to-end pipeline to identify circRNAs and their sponging systematically with raw total RNA-seq and miRNA-seq files, allowing us to better indicate the functional impact of circRNAs as a routine aspect in transcriptomic research. Availabilityhttps://github.com/biomedbigdata/circRNA-sponging Contactmarkus.daniel.hoffmann@tum.de; markus.list@tum.de Supplementary MaterialSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatic Advances online.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

TF-Prioritizer: a java pipeline to prioritize condition-specific transcription factors

BackgroundEukaryotic gene expression is controlled by cis-regulatory elements (CREs), including promoters and enhancers, which are bound by transcription factors (TFs). Differential expression of TFs and their binding affinity at putative CREs determine tissue- and developmental-specific transcriptional activity. Consolidating genomic data sets can offer further insights into the accessibility of CREs, TF activity, and, thus, gene regulation. However, the integration and analysis of multi-modal data sets are hampered by considerable technical challenges. While methods for highlighting differential TF activity from combined chromatin state data (e.g., ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, or DNase-seq) and RNA-seq data exist, they do not offer convenient usability, have limited support for large-scale data processing, and provide only minimal functionality for visually interpreting results. ResultsWe developed TF-Prioritizer, an automated pipeline that prioritizes condition-specific TFs from multi-modal data and generates an interactive web report. We demonstrated its potential by identifying known TFs along with their target genes, as well as previously unreported TFs active in lactating mouse mammary glands. Additionally, we studied a variety of ENCODE data sets for cell lines K562 and MCF-7, including twelve histone modification ChIP-seq as well as ATAC-seq and DNase-seq datasets, where we observe and discuss assay-specific differences. ConclusionTF-Prioritizer accepts ATAC-seq, DNase-seq, or ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data as input and identifies TFs with differential activity, thus offering an understanding of genome-wide gene regulation, potential pathogenesis, and therapeutic targets in biomedical research.

bioinformatics↗