Sunrise and sunset times are the main factors that determine the flowering time of photoperiod-sensitive sorghum
Crop photoperiodism models assume that flowering time is primarily controlled by daylength, yet many field observations contradict this view. We previously proposed an alternative framework integrating daily changes in sunrise and sunset times (dSR and dSS). Variety trials in Madagascar and in Argentina supported this concept: mid-late sorghum varieties from the northern hemisphere flowered late or very late when sown in November and December, consistent with the higher dSR/dSS values of the southern hemisphere summer. One Malian variety, sown monthly over six years in West Africa, exhibited high interannual variability in flowering time when sown between November and February. This revealed that up to four photoperiodic responses -- two quantitative and two qualitative, occurring at different times of the year -- may coexist within a single late photoperiod sensitive variety. All responses use only dSR and dSS cues. The qualitative responses are triggered by an internal phasic coincidence, which is set by a linear relationship between dSR and dSS at the onset of plant photoperiod sensitivity, and between dSR+dSS at panicle initiation. The research model fitted data from 28 varieties grown in Mali well. It also accurately fitted the duration to PI observed in three varieties sown at tropical and temperate latitudes. HighlightThe seasonal photoperiodic adaptation of flowering time in sorghum plants may rely on several signal transduction pathways regulated by sunrise and sunset times rather than day length.