Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Trinh, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Trinh, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cochlear tuning characteristics arise from temporal prediction of natural sounds

The cochlea decomposes incoming sound waveforms into different frequency components along the length of its basilar membrane. The receptor hair cells at the apical end of this resonant membrane are tuned to the lowest sound frequencies, with the preferred sound frequency of hair cell tuning increasing near-exponentially along the length of the membrane towards its basal end. This frequency composition of the sound is then transmitted to the brain by the auditory nerve fibers that innervate the inner hair cells. Hair cells respond to a sound impulse with a temporally asymmetric envelope and the sharpness of their tuning changes as the frequency to which they are most sensitive varies with their position along the basilar membrane. We ask if there is a normative explanation for why the cochlea decomposes sounds in this manner. Inspired by findings in the retina, we propose that cochlear tuning properties may be optimized for temporal prediction. This principle states that the sensory features represented by neurons are optimized to predict immediate future input from recent past input. We show that an artificial neural network optimized for temporal prediction of the immediate future of raw waveforms of natural sounds from their recent past produces tuning properties that resemble those observed in the auditory nerve. Specifically, the model captures the temporally asymmetric impulse responses, the tonotopic distribution and variation in tuning sharpness along the cochlea, and the frequency glide polarity of the impulse responses. These characteristics are not captured by a similar model optimized for compression of the sound waveform, rather than prediction. Given its success in accounting for the tuning properties at various processing levels in the auditory and visual systems, this finding for the cochlea provides further evidence that temporal prediction may be a general principle of sensory processing.

neuroscience↗

Natural sound characteristics explain perceptual categorization

As we interact with our surroundings, we encounter the same or similar objects from different perspectives and are compelled to generalize. For example, we recognize dog barks as a distinct class of sound, despite the variety of individual barks. While we have some understanding of how generalization is done along a single stimulus dimension, such as frequency or color, natural stimuli are identifiable by a combination of dimensions. To understand perception, measuring the interaction across stimulus dimensions is essential. For example, when identifying a sound, does our brain focus on a specific dimension or a combination, such as its frequency and duration? Furthermore, does the relative relevance of each dimension reflect its contribution to the natural sensory environment? Using a 2- dimension discrimination task for mice we tested untrained generalization across several pairs of auditory dimensions in a naturalistic and automatized behavioral paradigm. We uncovered a perceptual hierarchy over the tested dimensions that was dominated by the sounds spectral composition. This hierarchy could reflect the relevance of the different dimensions in natural stimuli and their potentially associated differential shaping of neuronal tuning. Mice could learn to pay more attention to dimensions low in the hierarchy, but this learning was more rigid and did not generalize as flexibly. Stimuli are thus not perceived as a whole but as a combination of their features, each of which weights differently on the dentification of the stimulus according to an established hierarchy.

neuroscience↗