Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tria, F. D. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Tria, F. D. K..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Gene duplications trace mitochondria to the onset of eukaryote complexity

The last eukaryote common ancestor (LECA) lived 1.6 billion years ago1,2. It possessed nuclei, sex, an endomembrane system, mitochondria, and all key traits that make eukaryotic cells more complex than their prokaryotic ancestors2-6. The closest known relatives of the host lineage that acquired the mitochondrion are, however, small obligately symbiotic archaea that lack any semblance of eukaryotic cell complexity7. Although the steep evolutionary grade separating prokaryotes from eukaryotes increasingly implicates mitochondrial symbiosis at eukaryote origin4,7, the timing and evolutionary significance of mitochondrial origin remains debated. Gradualist theories contend that eukaryotes arose from archaea by slow accumulation of eukaryotic traits8-10 with mitochondria arriving late11, while symbiotic theories have it that mitochondria initiated the onset of eukaryote complexity in a non-nucleated archaeal host7 by gene transfers from the organelle4,12-14. The evolutionary process leading to LECA should be recorded in its gene duplications. Among 163,545 duplications in 24,571 gene trees spanning 150 sequenced eukaryotic genomes we identified 713 gene duplication events that occurred in LECA. LECAs bacterially derived genes were duplicated more frequently than archaeal derived or eukaryote specific genes, reflecting the serial copying15,16 of genes from the mitochondrial endosymbiont to the archaeal hosts chromosomes prior to the onset of eukaryote genome complexity. Bacterial derived genes for mitochondrial functions, lipid synthesis, biosynthesis, as well as core carbon and energy metabolism in LECA were duplicated more often than archaeal derived genes and even more often than eukaryote-specific inventions for endomembrane, cytoskeletal or cell cycle functions. Gene duplications record the sequence of events at LECAs origin and indicate that recurrent gene transfer from a resident mitochondrial endosymbiont preceded the onset of eukaryotic cellular complexity.

evolutionary biology↗

Phylogenomic Testing of Root Hypotheses Without a Species Tree

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe determination of the last common ancestor (LCA) of a group of species plays a vital role in evolutionary theory. Traditionally, an LCA is inferred by the rooting of a fully resolved species tree. From a theoretical perspective, however, inference of the LCA amounts to the reconstruction of just one branch - the root branch - of the true species tree, and should therefore be a much easier task than the full resolution of the species tree. Discarding the reliance on a hypothesised species tree and its rooting leads us to re-evaluate what phylogenetic signal is directly relevant to LCA inference, and to recast the task as that of sampling the total evidence from all gene families at the genomic scope. Here we reformulate LCA and root inference in the framework of statistical hypothesis testing and outline an analytical procedure to formally test competing a-priori LCA hypotheses and to infer confidence sets for the earliest speciation events in the history of a group of species. Applying our methods to two demonstrative datasets we show that our inference of the opisthokonta LCA is well in agreement with the common knowledge. Inference of the proteobacteria LCA shows that it is most closely related to modern Epsilonproteobacteria, raising the possibility that it may have been characterized by a chemolithoautotrophic and anaerobic life-style. Our inference is based on data comprising between 43% (opisthokonta) and 86% (proteobacteria) of all gene families. Approaching LCA inference within a statistical framework renders the phylogenomic inference powerful and robust.

evolutionary biology↗

Anomalous phylogenetic behavior of ribosomal proteins in metagenome assembled genomes

Metagenomic studies have claimed the existence of novel lineages with unprecedented properties never before observed in prokaryotes. Such lineages include Asgard archaea1-3, which are purported to represent archaea with eukaryotic cell complexity, and the Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR), a novel domain level taxon erected solely on the basis of metagenomic data4. However, it has escaped the attention of most biologists that these metagenomic sequences are not assembled into genomes by sequence overlap, as for cultured archaea and bacteria. Instead, short contigs are sorted into computer files by a process called binning in which they receive taxonomic assignment on the basis of sequence properties like GC content, dinucleotide frequencies, and stoichiometric co-occurrence across samples. Consequently, they are not genome sequences as we know them, reflecting the gene content of real organisms. Rather they are metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs). Debates that Asgard data are contaminated with individual eukaryotic sequences5-7 are overshadowed by the more pressing issue that no evidence exists to indicate that any sequences in binned Asgard MAGs actually stem from the same chromosome, as opposed to simply stemming from the same environment. Here we show that Asgard and CPR MAGs fail spectacularly to meet the most basic phylogenetic criterion8 fulfilled by genome sequences of all cultured prokaryotes investigated to date: the ribosomal proteins of Asgard and CPR MAGs do not share common evolutionary histories. Their phylogenetic behavior is anomalous to a degree never observed with genomes of real organisms. CPR and Asgard MAGs are binning artefacts, assembled from environments where up to 90% of the DNA is from dead cells9-12. Asgard and CPR MAGs are unnatural constructs, genome-like patchworks of genes that have been stitched together into computer files by binning.

evolutionary biology↗