Biology subjects

Townsend, E. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Townsend, E. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Comparison of Chemotherapy Effects on Mechanical Sensitivity and Food-Maintained Operant Responding in Male and Female Rats

ObjectiveChemotherapies of varying classes often cause neuropathy and debilitating chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP) sufficient to limit treatment and reduce quality of life for many patients battling cancer. There are currently no effective preventative or alleviative treatments for CINP. Preclinical models have been developed to test candidate CINP treatments; however, studies using these models rarely provide direct comparisons of effects of different chemotherapies or assess the degree to which chemotherapies produce clinically relevant signs of pain-depressed behavior.\n\nMethodsMale and female Sprague-Dawley rats received four injections of vehicle, paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, vincristine, or bortezomib on alternate days. Mechanical hypersensitivity, body weight, and food-maintained operant responding were evaluated before, during, and for up to 42 days after initiation of treatment. Morphine potency and effectiveness to reverse chemotherapy-induced effects were also evaluated.\n\nResultsAll four chemotherapies produced dose-dependent and sustained mechanical hypersensitivity in all rats. Vincristine and oxaliplatin produced transient weight loss and decreases in food-maintained operant responding in all rats, whereas paclitaxel and bortezomib produced lesser or no effect. At four weeks after treatment, operant responding was depressed only in paclitaxel-treated males. Morphine reversed mechanical hypersensitivity in all rats but failed to reverse paclitaxel-induced depression of operant responding in males.\n\nConclusionsChemotherapy treatments sufficient to produce sustained mechanical hypersensitivity failed to produce sustained or morphine-reversible behavioral depression in rats. Insofar as pain-related behavioral depression is a cardinal sign of CINP in humans, these results challenge the presumption that these chemotherapy-dosing regimens are sufficient to model clinically relevant CINP in rats.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

bioRxiv2019

Lorcaserin maintenance fails to attenuate heroin vs food choice in rhesus monkeys

BackgroundThe current opioid crisis has reinvigorated preclinical research in the evaluation of non-opioid candidate treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). Emerging evidence suggests 5-HT2C receptor agonists may attenuate the abuse-related effects of opioids. This study evaluated effectiveness of 7-day treatment with the clinically available 5-HT2C agonist lorcaserin on heroin-vs.-food choice in rhesus monkeys. Lorcaserin effects were compared to effects produced by saline substitution and by 7-day treatment with the opioid antagonist naltrexone.\n\nMethodsAdult male (1) and female (6) rhesus monkeys were trained to respond under a concurrent schedule of food delivery (1g pellets, fixed-ratio 100 schedule) and intravenous heroin injections (0-0.032 mg/kg/injection, fixed-ratio 10 schedule) during daily 2h sessions. Heroin choice dose-effect functions were determined daily before and following 7-day saline substitution or 7-day continuous treatment with naltrexone (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h, IV) or lorcaserin (0.032-0.32 mg/kg/h, IV).\n\nResultsUnder baseline conditions, increasing heroin doses maintained a dose-dependent increase in heroin choice. Both saline substitution and 7-day naltrexone treatment significantly attenuated heroin choice and produced a reciprocal increase in food choice. Continuous lorcaserin treatment significantly increased heroin choice.\n\nConclusionsIn contrast to saline substitution and naltrexone, lorcaserin treatment was ineffective to reduce heroin-vs.-food choice. These preclinical results do not support the therapeutic potential of lorcaserin as a candidate OUD treatment.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Effectiveness and selectivity of a heroin conjugate vaccine to attenuate heroin, 6-acetylmorphine, and morphine antinociception in rats: Comparison with naltrexone

BackgroundOne emerging strategy to address the opioid crisis includes opioid-targeted immunopharmacotherapies. This study compared effectiveness of a heroin-tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugate vaccine to antagonize heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), morphine, and fentanyl antinociception in rats.\n\nMethodsAdult male and female Sprague Dawley rats received three doses of active or control vaccine at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Vaccine pharmacological selectivity was assessed by comparing opioid dose-effect curves in 50{degrees}C warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure before and after active or control heroin-TT vaccine. Route of administration [subcutaneous (SC) vs. intravenous [IV)] was also examined as a determinant of vaccine effectiveness. Continuous naltrexone treatment (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) effects on heroin, 6-AM, and morphine antinociceptive potency was also determined as a benchmark for minimal vaccine effectiveness.\n\nResultsThe heroin-TT vaccine decreased potency of SC heroin (5-fold), IV heroin (3-fold), and IV 6-AM (3-fold) for several weeks without affecting IV morphine or SC and IV fentanyl potency. The control vaccine did not alter potency of any opioid. Naltrexone dose-dependently decreased antinociceptive potency of SC heroin, and treatment with 0.01 mg/kg/h naltrexone produced similar, approximate 8-fold decreases in potencies of SC and IV heroin, IV 6-AM, and IV morphine. The combination of naltrexone and active vaccine was more effective than naltrexone alone to antagonize SC heroin but not IV heroin.\n\nConclusionsThe heroin-TT vaccine formulation examined is less effective, but more selective, than chronic naltrexone to attenuate heroin antinociception in rats. Furthermore, these results provide an empirical framework for future preclinical opioid vaccine research to benchmark effectiveness against naltrexone.

pharmacology and toxicology↗