Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tourell, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Tourell, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Guidelines for QSM phantom production and evaluation ofcandidate phantom materials

PurposeTo measure magnetic susceptibility ({chi}) with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) and evaluate its repeatability using four phantom doping materials relevant to QSM applications. MethodsA cylindrical phantom was constructed containing vials of agarose gel doped with two paramagnetic materials (ferritin, USPIO) and two diamagnetic materials (CaCl2, CaCO3) at five concentrations each. Single orientation QSM measurements (MEDI+0) were carried out on the phantom at 3T and 7T. We measured molar susceptibility ({chi}mol) from QSM and evaluated the test-retest repeatability of {chi} using the standard error of the measurement (SEM). We evaluated material lifespan by conducting a t-test of {chi}mol at various timepoints. Results{chi}mol (ppm{middle dot}L{middle dot}mmol-1) were measured as 1.67 {+/-} 0.24 and 0.74 {+/-} 0.09 (USPIO: 3T and 7T, respectively), 10-2x(8.13 {+/-} 1.35; 8.13 {+/-} 1.19) (Ferritin: 3T; 7T), 10-4x(-2.68 {+/-} 0.24; -2.71 {+/-} 0.37) (CaCl2: 3T; 7T), and 10-5x(-9.52 {+/-} 1.44; -9.53 {+/-} 1.18) (CaCO3: 3T; 7T). The USPIO SEM (1.5 {+/-} 2.0; 5.1 {+/-} 2.0 ppb at 3T; 7T) was greater than the ferritin SEM (1.2 {+/-} 1.0; 2.2 {+/-} 1.3 ppb at 3T; 7T). The CaCl2 SEM (7.5 {+/-} 5.5; 1.2 {+/-} 0.6 ppb at 3T; 7T) was greater than the CaCO3 SEM (1.2 {+/-} 0.6; 0.9 {+/-} 0.7 ppb at 3T; 7T). We observed no significant changes in molar susceptibility for ferritin and CaCO3 over the measured timeframes (24 months and 15 months, respectively). ConclusionWe recommend using ferritin and CaCO3 in the construction of susceptibility phantoms, removing later echo times for CaCO3 QSM reconstructions.

biophysics↗

QSMxT: Robust Masking and Artefact Reduction for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

PurposeQuantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is a post-processing technique applied to gradient-echo phase data. QSM algorithms require a signal mask to delineate regions with reliable phase signal for subsequent susceptibility estimation. Existing masking techniques used in QSM have limitations that introduce artefacts, exclude anatomical detail, and rely on parameter tuning and anatomical priors that narrow their application. Here, a robust masking and reconstruction procedure is presented to overcome these limitations and enable automated QSM processing for a wide range of use-cases implemented in an open-source software framework: QSMxT. MethodsA robust masking technique that automatically separates reliable from less reliable phase regions was developed and combined with a two-pass reconstruction procedure that operates on the separated sources before combination, extracting more information while reducing the influence of artefacts. ResultCompared with standard masking and reconstruction procedures, the two-pass inversion reduces streaking artefacts caused by unreliable phase and high dynamic ranges of susceptibility sources. QSMxT is robust across a range of datasets at 3 T in healthy volunteers and phantoms, at 7 T in tumour patients, and in the QSM challenge 2.0 simulated brain dataset, with significant artefact and error reductions, greater anatomical detail, and minimal parameter tuning. ConclusionQSMxT generates masks for QSM that separate reliable from less reliable phase regions, enables a more accurate QSM reconstruction that mitigates artefacts, operates without anatomical priors, and requires minimal parameter tuning. QSMxT makes QSM processing more accessible, reliable and reproducible.

neuroscience↗