Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tooker, J. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Tooker, J. F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Soybean aphids exploit abscisic acid signaling to suppress jasmonate defense responses

SummaryO_LISoybean aphids (Aphis glycines) can induce susceptibility on soybean (Glycine max) during colonization. However, the mechanism for this process is not known. Based on previous transcriptome analyses, we hypothesized that aphids block effective jasmonate (JA) defenses by inducing an antagonistic abscisic acid (ABA) signal. C_LIO_LITo test this hypothesis, we used a combination of gene expression analyses, measurements of hormone levels, and aphid bioassays on plants with reduced expression of ABA-related genes. C_LIO_LIAphid feeding attenuated JA responses in soybean plants and facilitated the growth of a chewing herbivore. Aphid-treated plants had increased levels of cis-JA but not biologically active JA-isoleucine, and aphid feeding induced expression of genes associated with JA-Ile catabolism. In parallel, aphid-feeding induced higher levels of ABA. ABA treatment and knockdown lines impaired in ABA biosynthesis (aba2-RNAi) or signaling (scof-1-RNAi), showed that ABA suppressed wound-induced JA responses. Aphid populations were significantly reduced on ABA-deficient plants and aphid-regulated attenuation of JA signaling was abolished in these lines. Remarkably, plants defective in ABA signaling had increased JA signaling in the absence of stressors. C_LIO_LIOur results indicate that, in soybean, the ABA pathway is necessary to control basal levels of JA and soybean aphids exploit this ABA-JA antagonism to suppress plant defenses. C_LI

plant biology↗

Seasonal bee communities vary in their responses local and landscape scales: implication for land managers

ContextThere is great interest in land management practices for pollinators; however, a quantitative comparison of landscape and local effects on bee communities is necessary to determine if adding small habitat patches can increase bee abundance or species richness. The value of increasing floral abundance at a site is undoubtedly influenced by the phenology and magnitude of floral resources in the landscape, but due to the complexity of measuring landscape-scale resources, these factors have been understudied. ObjectivesTo address this knowledge gap, we quantified the relative importance of local versus landscape scale resources for bee communities, identified the most important metrics of local and landscape quality, and evaluated how these relationships vary with season. MethodsWe studied season-specific relationships between local and landscape quality and wild-bee communities at 33 sites in the Finger Lakes region of New York, USA. We paired site surveys of wild bees, plants, and soil characteristics with a multi-dimensional assessment of landscape composition, configuration, insecticide toxic load, and a spatio-temporal evaluation of floral resources at local and landscape scales. ResultsWe found that the most relevant spatial scale varied by season. Spring bees depended on landscape resources, but summer bees responded more to local quality, implying that site-level management is most likely to be successful in supporting summer bees. Semi-natural habitats, including forests, wetlands, and other aquatic habitats, were particularly important for spring bees. ConclusionsBy considering spatial and temporal variation in resources, we developed season-specific recommendations to improve habitat quality for wild bees and offset manifold stressors threatening these essential pollinators.

ecology↗